@article{20163902832944 ,
language = {English},
copyright = {Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2023 Elsevier Inc.},
copyright = {Compendex},
title = {Comparison of wind tunnel and on site measurements for urban wind energy estimation of potential yield},
journal = {Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics},
author = {Al-Quraan, Ayman and Stathopoulos, Ted and Pillay, Pragasen},
volume = {158},
year = {2016},
pages = {1 - 10},
issn = {01676105},
abstract = {<div data-language="eng" data-ev-field="abstract">There is a need to compare wind tunnel results with field measurement wind data in order to examine the validity of wind tunnel data in providing realistic estimates of urban wind energy potential and assess the probable errors involved. The paper refers to and discusses two Montreal building cases with different upstream roughness homogeneity. In the first case, field wind speed measurements are used to calculate the wind energy potential for a building with upstream rather homogeneous suburban type of terrain. In the second case, the building upstream terrain is very rough and highly nonhomogeneous. The calculated wind energy potential based on the field measurements was compared with the estimated value based on respective boundary layer wind tunnel data. In the first case, where the upstream terrain is homogeneous, the difference between the estimation of wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is less than 5%. However, in the second case with the nonhomogeneous upstream terrain conditions, the difference between the estimation of the wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is increased by up to 20%.<br/></div> &copy; 2016},
key = {Wind tunnels},
keywords = {Wind power;Wind speed;Urban growth;Buildings;Wind effects;Landforms;Boundary layers;},
note = {Boundary layer wind tunnel;Energy estimation;Field measurement;On-site measurement;Upstream terrain;Wind measurement;Wind speed estimations;Wind speed measurement;},
URL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.08.011},
}

{"_id":"E5DfYKTzgKahkLqQJ","bibbaseid":"alquraan-stathopoulos-pillay-comparisonofwindtunnelandonsitemeasurementsforurbanwindenergyestimationofpotentialyield-2016","author_short":["Al-Quraan, A.","Stathopoulos, T.","Pillay, P."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","language":"English","copyright":"Compendex","title":"Comparison of wind tunnel and on site measurements for urban wind energy estimation of potential yield","journal":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Al-Quraan"],"firstnames":["Ayman"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Stathopoulos"],"firstnames":["Ted"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pillay"],"firstnames":["Pragasen"],"suffixes":[]}],"volume":"158","year":"2016","pages":"1 - 10","issn":"01676105","abstract":"<div data-language=\"eng\" data-ev-field=\"abstract\">There is a need to compare wind tunnel results with field measurement wind data in order to examine the validity of wind tunnel data in providing realistic estimates of urban wind energy potential and assess the probable errors involved. The paper refers to and discusses two Montreal building cases with different upstream roughness homogeneity. In the first case, field wind speed measurements are used to calculate the wind energy potential for a building with upstream rather homogeneous suburban type of terrain. In the second case, the building upstream terrain is very rough and highly nonhomogeneous. The calculated wind energy potential based on the field measurements was compared with the estimated value based on respective boundary layer wind tunnel data. In the first case, where the upstream terrain is homogeneous, the difference between the estimation of wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is less than 5%. However, in the second case with the nonhomogeneous upstream terrain conditions, the difference between the estimation of the wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is increased by up to 20%.<br/></div> &copy; 2016","key":"20163902832944","keywords":"Wind power;Wind speed;Urban growth;Buildings;Wind effects;Landforms;Boundary layers;","note":"Boundary layer wind tunnel;Energy estimation;Field measurement;On-site measurement;Upstream terrain;Wind measurement;Wind speed estimations;Wind speed measurement;","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.08.011","bibtex":"@article{20163902832944 ,\nlanguage = {English},\ncopyright = {Compilation and indexing terms, Copyright 2023 Elsevier Inc.},\ncopyright = {Compendex},\ntitle = {Comparison of wind tunnel and on site measurements for urban wind energy estimation of potential yield},\njournal = {Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics},\nauthor = {Al-Quraan, Ayman and Stathopoulos, Ted and Pillay, Pragasen},\nvolume = {158},\nyear = {2016},\npages = {1 - 10},\nissn = {01676105},\nabstract = {<div data-language=\"eng\" data-ev-field=\"abstract\">There is a need to compare wind tunnel results with field measurement wind data in order to examine the validity of wind tunnel data in providing realistic estimates of urban wind energy potential and assess the probable errors involved. The paper refers to and discusses two Montreal building cases with different upstream roughness homogeneity. In the first case, field wind speed measurements are used to calculate the wind energy potential for a building with upstream rather homogeneous suburban type of terrain. In the second case, the building upstream terrain is very rough and highly nonhomogeneous. The calculated wind energy potential based on the field measurements was compared with the estimated value based on respective boundary layer wind tunnel data. In the first case, where the upstream terrain is homogeneous, the difference between the estimation of wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is less than 5%. However, in the second case with the nonhomogeneous upstream terrain conditions, the difference between the estimation of the wind energy potential and the calculation using the field measurements is increased by up to 20%.<br/></div> &copy; 2016},\nkey = {Wind tunnels},\nkeywords = {Wind power;Wind speed;Urban growth;Buildings;Wind effects;Landforms;Boundary layers;},\nnote = {Boundary layer wind tunnel;Energy estimation;Field measurement;On-site measurement;Upstream terrain;Wind measurement;Wind speed estimations;Wind speed measurement;},\nURL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.08.011},\n} \n\n\n","author_short":["Al-Quraan, A.","Stathopoulos, T.","Pillay, P."],"id":"20163902832944","bibbaseid":"alquraan-stathopoulos-pillay-comparisonofwindtunnelandonsitemeasurementsforurbanwindenergyestimationofpotentialyield-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2016.08.011"},"keyword":["Wind power;Wind speed;Urban growth;Buildings;Wind effects;Landforms;Boundary layers;"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/m3A3cns49MKmeRzt5","dataSources":["6bQoEjmiPcFP9pfsZ","6Aw5QAtT2yLJ3d2JP","qBPxBjrzghRQ4Wzbf","EnwwBMFxopKkypo2f","8uWbXNBCDiEboMj8h"],"keywords":["wind power;wind speed;urban growth;buildings;wind effects;landforms;boundary layers;"],"search_terms":["comparison","wind","tunnel","site","measurements","urban","wind","energy","estimation","potential","yield","al-quraan","stathopoulos","pillay"],"title":"Comparison of wind tunnel and on site measurements for urban wind energy estimation of potential yield","year":2016}