@techreport{13282,
author       = {Amin, A. K. and Hildebrand, M. and van Ossenbruggen, J. R. and Evers, V. and Hardman, L.},
title        = {List, {Group} {Or} {Menu}: {Organizing} {Suggestions} {In} {Autocompletion} {Interfaces}},
type         = {CWI Technical Report},
origin       = {other},
series       = {Information Systems [INS]},
year         = {2009},
month        = {January},
number       = {INS-E0901},
publisher    = {CWI},
issn         = {1386-3681},
institution  = {CWI},
keywords     = {autocompletion },
group        = {INS2},
language     = {en},
project      = {Non-NWO Project 1},
abstract     = {We describe two user studies that investigate organization strategies
of autocompletion in a known-item
 search task: searching for terms taken from
a thesaurus. In Study 1, we explored ways of grouping term suggestions from
two
 different thesauri (TGN and WordNet) and found that different thesauri may
require different organization strategies. Users
 found Group organization more
appropriate to organize location names from TGN, while Alphabetical works better
for WordNet.
 In Study 2, we compared three different organization strategies
(Alphabetical, Group and Composite) for location name search
 tasks. The results
indicate that for TGN autocompletion interfaces help improve the quality
of keywords, Group and Composite
 organization help users search faster, and is
perceived easier to understand and to use than Alphabetical.},
url          = {http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/13282/13282A.pdf},
}

{"_id":{"_str":"5211f22e44b2654d3d0000f9"},"__v":3,"authorIDs":["545cbba26aaec20d23000186","5NMn3nQtSs5PhrZNQ"],"author_short":["Amin, A. K.","Hildebrand, M.","van Ossenbruggen, J. R.","Evers, V.","Hardman, L."],"bibbaseid":"amin-hildebrand-vanossenbruggen-evers-hardman-listgroupormenuorganizingsuggestionsinautocompletioninterfaces-2009","bibdata":{"bibtype":"techreport","type":"CWI Technical Report","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Amin"],"firstnames":["A.","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hildebrand"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van"],"lastnames":["Ossenbruggen"],"firstnames":["J.","R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Evers"],"firstnames":["V."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hardman"],"firstnames":["L."],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"List, Group Or Menu: Organizing Suggestions In Autocompletion Interfaces","origin":"other","series":"Information Systems [INS]","year":"2009","month":"January","number":"INS-E0901","publisher":"CWI","issn":"1386-3681","institution":"CWI","keywords":"autocompletion ","group":"INS2","language":"en","project":"Non-NWO Project 1","abstract":"We describe two user studies that investigate organization strategies of autocompletion in a known-item search task: searching for terms taken from a thesaurus. In Study 1, we explored ways of grouping term suggestions from two different thesauri (TGN and WordNet) and found that different thesauri may require different organization strategies. Users found Group organization more appropriate to organize location names from TGN, while Alphabetical works better for WordNet. In Study 2, we compared three different organization strategies (Alphabetical, Group and Composite) for location name search tasks. The results indicate that for TGN autocompletion interfaces help improve the quality of keywords, Group and Composite organization help users search faster, and is perceived easier to understand and to use than Alphabetical.","url":"http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/13282/13282A.pdf","bibtex":"@techreport{13282,\nauthor = {Amin, A. K. and Hildebrand, M. and van Ossenbruggen, J. R. and Evers, V. and Hardman, L.},\ntitle = {List, {Group} {Or} {Menu}: {Organizing} {Suggestions} {In} {Autocompletion} {Interfaces}},\ntype = {CWI Technical Report},\norigin = {other},\nseries = {Information Systems [INS]},\nyear = {2009},\nmonth = {January},\nnumber = {INS-E0901},\npublisher = {CWI},\nissn = {1386-3681},\ninstitution = {CWI},\nkeywords = {autocompletion },\ngroup = {INS2},\nlanguage = {en},\nproject = {Non-NWO Project 1},\nabstract = {We describe two user studies that investigate organization strategies\r\nof autocompletion in a known-item\n search task: searching for terms taken from\r\na thesaurus. In Study 1, we explored ways of grouping term suggestions from\r\ntwo\n different thesauri (TGN and WordNet) and found that different thesauri may\r\nrequire different organization strategies. Users\n found Group organization more\r\nappropriate to organize location names from TGN, while Alphabetical works better\r\nfor WordNet.\n In Study 2, we compared three different organization strategies\r\n(Alphabetical, Group and Composite) for location name search\n tasks. The results\r\nindicate that for TGN autocompletion interfaces help improve the quality\r\nof keywords, Group and Composite\n organization help users search faster, and is\r\nperceived easier to understand and to use than Alphabetical.},\nurl = {http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/13282/13282A.pdf},\n}\n\r\n\r\n\r\n","author_short":["Amin, A. K.","Hildebrand, M.","van Ossenbruggen, J. R.","Evers, V.","Hardman, L."],"key":"13282","id":"13282","bibbaseid":"amin-hildebrand-vanossenbruggen-evers-hardman-listgroupormenuorganizingsuggestionsinautocompletioninterfaces-2009","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/13282/13282A.pdf"},"keyword":["autocompletion"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"van ossenbruggen, j":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=http://homepages.cwi.nl/~jrvosse/publications/pubs.bib&proxy=1"}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"techreport","biburl":"http://homepages.cwi.nl/~jrvosse/publications/pubs.bib","downloads":0,"keywords":["autocompletion"],"search_terms":["list","group","menu","organizing","suggestions","autocompletion","interfaces","amin","hildebrand","van ossenbruggen","evers","hardman"],"title":"List, Group Or Menu: Organizing Suggestions In Autocompletion Interfaces","title_words":["list","group","menu","organizing","suggestions","autocompletion","interfaces"],"year":2009,"dataSources":["5GYijBLBgdYqK9T7H"]}