Tracking extrema in dynamic environments. Angeline, P. J. In Evolutionary Programming VI, volume 1213, of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 335--345, 1997. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Typical applications of evolutionary optimization involve the off-line approximation of extrema of static multi-modal functions. Methods which use a variety of techniques to self-adapt mutation parameters have been shown to be more successful than methods which do not use self-adaptation. For dynamic functions, the interest is not to obtain the extrema but to follow it as closely as possible. This paper compares the on-line extrema tracking performance of an evolutionary program without self-adaptation against an evolutionary program using a self-adaptive Gaussian update rule over a number of dynamics applied to a simple static function. The experiments demonstrate that for some dynamic functions, self-adaptation is effective while for others it is detrimental.
@inproceedings{angeline_tracking_1997,
series = {Lecture {Notes} in {Computer} {Science}},
title = {Tracking extrema in dynamic environments},
volume = {1213},
isbn = {978-3-540-62788-3},
url = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/mq65257r410q114h/},
doi = {10.1007/BFb0014823},
abstract = {Typical applications of evolutionary optimization involve the off-line approximation of extrema of static multi-modal functions. Methods which use a variety of techniques to self-adapt mutation parameters have been shown to be more successful than methods which do not use self-adaptation. For dynamic functions, the interest is not to obtain the extrema but to follow it as closely as possible. This paper compares the on-line extrema tracking performance of an evolutionary program without self-adaptation against an evolutionary program using a self-adaptive Gaussian update rule over a number of dynamics applied to a simple static function. The experiments demonstrate that for some dynamic functions, self-adaptation is effective while for others it is detrimental.},
booktitle = {Evolutionary {Programming} {VI}},
publisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},
author = {Angeline, Peter J.},
year = {1997},
pages = {335--345}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"xGL5SFtwZEHrTcd9u","bibbaseid":"angeline-trackingextremaindynamicenvironments-1997","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-04-11T12:50:02.660Z","title":"Tracking extrema in dynamic environments","author_short":["Angeline, P. J."],"year":1997,"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/1317729/collections/B8J28C3R/items?key=1QwVoCZkST7hnrVlLRsMgoNB&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","series":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science","title":"Tracking extrema in dynamic environments","volume":"1213","isbn":"978-3-540-62788-3","url":"http://www.springerlink.com/content/mq65257r410q114h/","doi":"10.1007/BFb0014823","abstract":"Typical applications of evolutionary optimization involve the off-line approximation of extrema of static multi-modal functions. Methods which use a variety of techniques to self-adapt mutation parameters have been shown to be more successful than methods which do not use self-adaptation. For dynamic functions, the interest is not to obtain the extrema but to follow it as closely as possible. This paper compares the on-line extrema tracking performance of an evolutionary program without self-adaptation against an evolutionary program using a self-adaptive Gaussian update rule over a number of dynamics applied to a simple static function. The experiments demonstrate that for some dynamic functions, self-adaptation is effective while for others it is detrimental.","booktitle":"Evolutionary Programming VI","publisher":"Springer Berlin / Heidelberg","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Angeline"],"firstnames":["Peter","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1997","pages":"335--345","bibtex":"@inproceedings{angeline_tracking_1997,\n\tseries = {Lecture {Notes} in {Computer} {Science}},\n\ttitle = {Tracking extrema in dynamic environments},\n\tvolume = {1213},\n\tisbn = {978-3-540-62788-3},\n\turl = {http://www.springerlink.com/content/mq65257r410q114h/},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/BFb0014823},\n\tabstract = {Typical applications of evolutionary optimization involve the off-line approximation of extrema of static multi-modal functions. Methods which use a variety of techniques to self-adapt mutation parameters have been shown to be more successful than methods which do not use self-adaptation. For dynamic functions, the interest is not to obtain the extrema but to follow it as closely as possible. This paper compares the on-line extrema tracking performance of an evolutionary program without self-adaptation against an evolutionary program using a self-adaptive Gaussian update rule over a number of dynamics applied to a simple static function. The experiments demonstrate that for some dynamic functions, self-adaptation is effective while for others it is detrimental.},\n\tbooktitle = {Evolutionary {Programming} {VI}},\n\tpublisher = {Springer Berlin / Heidelberg},\n\tauthor = {Angeline, Peter J.},\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tpages = {335--345}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Angeline, P. J."],"key":"angeline_tracking_1997","id":"angeline_tracking_1997","bibbaseid":"angeline-trackingextremaindynamicenvironments-1997","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.springerlink.com/content/mq65257r410q114h/"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["tracking","extrema","dynamic","environments","angeline"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["YYcd3qZWdjjLqC7YK"]}