@misc{noauthor_antifragility_2021,
	title = {Antifragility},
	copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License},
	url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antifragility&oldid=1013667270},
	abstract = {Antifragility is a property of systems in which they increase in capability to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures. The concept was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his  book, Antifragile, and in technical papers. As Taleb explains in his book, antifragility is fundamentally different from the concepts of resiliency (i.e. the ability to recover from failure) and robustness (that is, the ability to resist failure). The concept has been applied in risk analysis, physics, molecular biology, transportation planning, engineering, Aerospace (NASA), and computer science.Taleb defines it as follows in a letter to Nature responding to an earlier review of his book in that journal:

Simply, antifragility is defined as a convex response to a stressor or source of harm (for some range of variation), leading to a positive sensitivity to increase in volatility (or variability, stress, dispersion of outcomes, or uncertainty, what is grouped under the designation "disorder cluster"). Likewise fragility is defined as a concave sensitivity to stressors, leading to a negative sensitivity to increase in volatility. The relation between fragility, convexity, and sensitivity to disorder is mathematical, obtained by theorem, not derived from empirical data mining or some historical narrative. It is a priori.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-04-09},
	journal = {Wikipedia},
	month = mar,
	year = {2021},
	note = {Page Version ID: 1013667270},
}

{"_id":"AJGBggZF5P87PJKc9","bibbaseid":"anonymous-antifragility-2021","bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"Antifragility","copyright":"Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License","url":"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antifragility&oldid=1013667270","abstract":"Antifragility is a property of systems in which they increase in capability to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures. The concept was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book, Antifragile, and in technical papers. As Taleb explains in his book, antifragility is fundamentally different from the concepts of resiliency (i.e. the ability to recover from failure) and robustness (that is, the ability to resist failure). The concept has been applied in risk analysis, physics, molecular biology, transportation planning, engineering, Aerospace (NASA), and computer science.Taleb defines it as follows in a letter to Nature responding to an earlier review of his book in that journal: Simply, antifragility is defined as a convex response to a stressor or source of harm (for some range of variation), leading to a positive sensitivity to increase in volatility (or variability, stress, dispersion of outcomes, or uncertainty, what is grouped under the designation \"disorder cluster\"). Likewise fragility is defined as a concave sensitivity to stressors, leading to a negative sensitivity to increase in volatility. The relation between fragility, convexity, and sensitivity to disorder is mathematical, obtained by theorem, not derived from empirical data mining or some historical narrative. It is a priori.","language":"en","urldate":"2021-04-09","journal":"Wikipedia","month":"March","year":"2021","note":"Page Version ID: 1013667270","bibtex":"@misc{noauthor_antifragility_2021,\n\ttitle = {Antifragility},\n\tcopyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License},\n\turl = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antifragility&oldid=1013667270},\n\tabstract = {Antifragility is a property of systems in which they increase in capability to thrive as a result of stressors, shocks, volatility, noise, mistakes, faults, attacks, or failures. The concept was developed by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book, Antifragile, and in technical papers. As Taleb explains in his book, antifragility is fundamentally different from the concepts of resiliency (i.e. the ability to recover from failure) and robustness (that is, the ability to resist failure). The concept has been applied in risk analysis, physics, molecular biology, transportation planning, engineering, Aerospace (NASA), and computer science.Taleb defines it as follows in a letter to Nature responding to an earlier review of his book in that journal:\n\nSimply, antifragility is defined as a convex response to a stressor or source of harm (for some range of variation), leading to a positive sensitivity to increase in volatility (or variability, stress, dispersion of outcomes, or uncertainty, what is grouped under the designation \"disorder cluster\"). Likewise fragility is defined as a concave sensitivity to stressors, leading to a negative sensitivity to increase in volatility. The relation between fragility, convexity, and sensitivity to disorder is mathematical, obtained by theorem, not derived from empirical data mining or some historical narrative. It is a priori.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-04-09},\n\tjournal = {Wikipedia},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tnote = {Page Version ID: 1013667270},\n}\n\n\n\n","key":"noauthor_antifragility_2021-1-1","id":"noauthor_antifragility_2021-1-1","bibbaseid":"anonymous-antifragility-2021","role":"","urls":{"Paper":"https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antifragility&oldid=1013667270"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/saracatanese","dataSources":["eTsH756eicg6vxuG3","CiGrRHTnX8v9GrWL8","WNyGqEWcwDk8KcxPF","ThttW7PALwAj8Kk5v","Atqd7ACcYiuJWgFM5","Lyhwm7bZpWEXiXz3C","2xNJt8F9ycSxncQKj","nkPnqKJ3edHvru7xy","oE7RvY24f5uMojc2o","oifZ6kNaBgC8TKSa7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["antifragility"],"title":"Antifragility","year":2021}