Critical legal studies. July, 2014. Page Version ID: 615682053![Critical legal studies [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper abstract bibtex Critical legal studies was a movement in legal thought in the 1970s and 80s committed to shaping society based on a vision of human personality devoid of the hidden interests and class domination that was argued to be behind existing legal institutions.[1] Adherents of the movement sought to destabilize traditional conceptions of law, and to unravel and challenge existing legal institutions. The more constructive members, such as Roberto Mangabeira Unger, sought to rebuild these institutions as an expression of human coexistence and not just a provisional truce in a brutal struggle,[2] and were seen as the most powerful voices and the only way forward for the movement.[3][4][5] Unger is one of the last standing members of the movement to continue to try to develop it in new directions—namely, to make legal analysis the basis of developing institutional alternatives.[6][7]
@misc{noauthor_critical_2014,
title = {Critical legal studies},
copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License},
url = {http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_legal_studies&oldid=615682053},
abstract = {Critical legal studies was a movement in legal thought in the 1970s and 80s committed to shaping society based on a vision of human personality devoid of the hidden interests and class domination that was argued to be behind existing legal institutions.[1] Adherents of the movement sought to destabilize traditional conceptions of law, and to unravel and challenge existing legal institutions. The more constructive members, such as Roberto Mangabeira Unger, sought to rebuild these institutions as an expression of human coexistence and not just a provisional truce in a brutal struggle,[2] and were seen as the most powerful voices and the only way forward for the movement.[3][4][5] Unger is one of the last standing members of the movement to continue to try to develop it in new directions—namely, to make legal analysis the basis of developing institutional alternatives.[6][7]},
language = {en},
urldate = {2014-07-08},
journal = {Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia},
month = jul,
year = {2014},
note = {Page Version ID: 615682053},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"sbx3ZYP2mAN4pGZFZ","bibbaseid":"anonymous-criticallegalstudies-2014","bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"Critical legal studies","copyright":"Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License","url":"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_legal_studies&oldid=615682053","abstract":"Critical legal studies was a movement in legal thought in the 1970s and 80s committed to shaping society based on a vision of human personality devoid of the hidden interests and class domination that was argued to be behind existing legal institutions.[1] Adherents of the movement sought to destabilize traditional conceptions of law, and to unravel and challenge existing legal institutions. The more constructive members, such as Roberto Mangabeira Unger, sought to rebuild these institutions as an expression of human coexistence and not just a provisional truce in a brutal struggle,[2] and were seen as the most powerful voices and the only way forward for the movement.[3][4][5] Unger is one of the last standing members of the movement to continue to try to develop it in new directions—namely, to make legal analysis the basis of developing institutional alternatives.[6][7]","language":"en","urldate":"2014-07-08","journal":"Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia","month":"July","year":"2014","note":"Page Version ID: 615682053","bibtex":"@misc{noauthor_critical_2014,\n\ttitle = {Critical legal studies},\n\tcopyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License},\n\turl = {http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_legal_studies&oldid=615682053},\n\tabstract = {Critical legal studies was a movement in legal thought in the 1970s and 80s committed to shaping society based on a vision of human personality devoid of the hidden interests and class domination that was argued to be behind existing legal institutions.[1] Adherents of the movement sought to destabilize traditional conceptions of law, and to unravel and challenge existing legal institutions. The more constructive members, such as Roberto Mangabeira Unger, sought to rebuild these institutions as an expression of human coexistence and not just a provisional truce in a brutal struggle,[2] and were seen as the most powerful voices and the only way forward for the movement.[3][4][5] Unger is one of the last standing members of the movement to continue to try to develop it in new directions—namely, to make legal analysis the basis of developing institutional alternatives.[6][7]},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2014-07-08},\n\tjournal = {Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {Page Version ID: 615682053},\n}\n\n","key":"noauthor_critical_2014","id":"noauthor_critical_2014","bibbaseid":"anonymous-criticallegalstudies-2014","role":"","urls":{"Paper":"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critical_legal_studies&oldid=615682053"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/italoalves","dataSources":["obTLNMFqp7B9XuTYb"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["critical","legal","studies"],"title":"Critical legal studies","year":2014}