Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11: response to critics. 41(1):98-104, USA, 2013. Bernet, William Baker, Amy J L United States J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):98-104.abstract bibtex There has been considerable interest among forensic practitioners in the proposals that parental alienation be included in the next editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases (DSM) and The International Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, there has also been a great deal of misunderstanding about the proposals, and misinformation has been expressed in professional meetings, on websites, and in journal articles. In this article we address four common misunderstandings regarding parental alienation: that there is a lack of research to support it as a diagnosis; that adopting parental alienation as a diagnosis will lead to serious adverse consequences; that the advocates of parental alienation are driven by self-serving or malevolent motives; and that Richard Gardner should be criticized for self-publishing his description of parental alienation syndrome.
@article{Bernet2013pad5,
title = {Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11: response to critics},
xau = {Bernet, W. | Baker, A. J.},
year = {2013},
address = {USA},
xet = {2013/03/19},
issn = {1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)},
keywords = {Child Reactive Disorders and Child, Preschool and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Humans and International Classification of Diseases and Mental Disorders/diagnosis and Object Attachment and Parent-Child Relations and Qualitative Research},
xla = {English},
note = {Bernet, William Baker, Amy J L United States J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):98-104.},
number = {1},
xu2 = {Critics | Qualitative Research},
booktitle = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law},
volume = {41},
abstract = {There has been considerable interest among forensic practitioners in the proposals that parental alienation be included in the next editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases (DSM) and The International Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, there has also been a great deal of misunderstanding about the proposals, and misinformation has been expressed in professional meetings, on websites, and in journal articles. In this article we address four common misunderstandings regarding parental alienation: that there is a lack of research to support it as a diagnosis; that adopting parental alienation as a diagnosis will lead to serious adverse consequences; that the advocates of parental alienation are driven by self-serving or malevolent motives; and that Richard Gardner should be criticized for self-publishing his description of parental alienation syndrome.},
pages = {98-104}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"wgnJZ5gKHGgqZ7EYz","bibbaseid":"anonymous-parentalalienationdsm5andicd11responsetocritics-2013","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11: response to critics","xau":"Bernet, W. | Baker, A. J.","year":"2013","address":"USA","xet":"2013/03/19","issn":"1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)","keywords":"Child Reactive Disorders and Child, Preschool and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Humans and International Classification of Diseases and Mental Disorders/diagnosis and Object Attachment and Parent-Child Relations and Qualitative Research","xla":"English","note":"Bernet, William Baker, Amy J L United States J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):98-104.","number":"1","xu2":"Critics | Qualitative Research","booktitle":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":"41","abstract":"There has been considerable interest among forensic practitioners in the proposals that parental alienation be included in the next editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases (DSM) and The International Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, there has also been a great deal of misunderstanding about the proposals, and misinformation has been expressed in professional meetings, on websites, and in journal articles. In this article we address four common misunderstandings regarding parental alienation: that there is a lack of research to support it as a diagnosis; that adopting parental alienation as a diagnosis will lead to serious adverse consequences; that the advocates of parental alienation are driven by self-serving or malevolent motives; and that Richard Gardner should be criticized for self-publishing his description of parental alienation syndrome.","pages":"98-104","bibtex":"@article{Bernet2013pad5,\n title = {Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11: response to critics},\n xau = {Bernet, W. | Baker, A. J.},\n year = {2013},\n address = {USA},\n xet = {2013/03/19},\n issn = {1943-3662 (Electronic) 1093-6793 (Linking)},\n keywords = {Child Reactive Disorders and Child, Preschool and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Humans and International Classification of Diseases and Mental Disorders/diagnosis and Object Attachment and Parent-Child Relations and Qualitative Research},\n xla = {English},\n note = {Bernet, William Baker, Amy J L United States J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):98-104.},\n number = {1},\n xu2 = {Critics | Qualitative Research},\n booktitle = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law},\n volume = {41},\n abstract = {There has been considerable interest among forensic practitioners in the proposals that parental alienation be included in the next editions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Diseases (DSM) and The International Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, there has also been a great deal of misunderstanding about the proposals, and misinformation has been expressed in professional meetings, on websites, and in journal articles. In this article we address four common misunderstandings regarding parental alienation: that there is a lack of research to support it as a diagnosis; that adopting parental alienation as a diagnosis will lead to serious adverse consequences; that the advocates of parental alienation are driven by self-serving or malevolent motives; and that Richard Gardner should be criticized for self-publishing his description of parental alienation syndrome.},\n pages = {98-104}\n}\n\n","key":"Bernet2013pad5-1","id":"Bernet2013pad5-1","bibbaseid":"anonymous-parentalalienationdsm5andicd11responsetocritics-2013","role":"","urls":{},"keyword":["Child Reactive Disorders and Child","Preschool and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and Humans and International Classification of Diseases and Mental Disorders/diagnosis and Object Attachment and Parent-Child Relations and Qualitative Research"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/v9y3N5nSNJCGbutCQ/PASG_library_converted.bib","dataSources":["DkxHaYY5Deg2ufLDd"],"keywords":["child reactive disorders and child","preschool and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and humans and international classification of diseases and mental disorders/diagnosis and object attachment and parent-child relations and qualitative research"],"search_terms":["parental","alienation","dsm","icd","response","critics"],"title":"Parental alienation, DSM-5, and ICD-11: response to critics","year":2013}