Accumulation of new knowledge and advances in fishery management: two complementary processes?. Apostolaki, P., Pilling, G. M., Armstrong, M. J., Metcalfe, J. D., & Forster, R. In Payne, A, Cotter, J, & Potter, T, editors, ADVANCES IN FISHERIES SCIENCE: 50 YEARS ON FROM BEVERTON AND HOLT, pages 229-254. BLACKWELL SCIENCE PUBL, OSNEY MEAD, OXFORD OX2 0EL, ENGLAND, 2008.
doi  abstract   bibtex   
The past few decades have marked a dramatic change in our ability to collect, analyse and use information about fish stocks, the natural systems of which they are part, and the external conditions that affect them. It is often claimed that this knowledge would contribute to the sustainable use of marine resources if taken into account in the development of fisheries management plans. However, the incorporation of new knowledge in such processes has been slow compared with the rate at which new knowledge is accumulated. Here, we discuss some of the factors that can impede the uptake of new knowledge at both the level of preparing official scientific advice or when this advice is used to adopt fishery management measures. We also suggest ways to improve utilization and uptake of new knowledge and reference cases in which such uptake has been facilitated.
@incollection{ ISI:000288205300012,
Author = {Apostolaki, Panayiota and Pilling, Graham M. and Armstrong, Michael J.
   and Metcalfe, Julian D. and Forster, Rodney},
Editor = {{Payne, A and Cotter, J and Potter, T}},
Title = {{Accumulation of new knowledge and advances in fishery management: two
   complementary processes?}},
Booktitle = {{ADVANCES IN FISHERIES SCIENCE: 50 YEARS ON FROM BEVERTON AND HOLT}},
Year = {{2008}},
Pages = {{229-254}},
Abstract = {{The past few decades have marked a dramatic change in our ability to
   collect, analyse and use information about fish stocks, the natural
   systems of which they are part, and the external conditions that affect
   them. It is often claimed that this knowledge would contribute to the
   sustainable use of marine resources if taken into account in the
   development of fisheries management plans. However, the incorporation of
   new knowledge in such processes has been slow compared with the rate at
   which new knowledge is accumulated. Here, we discuss some of the factors
   that can impede the uptake of new knowledge at both the level of
   preparing official scientific advice or when this advice is used to
   adopt fishery management measures. We also suggest ways to improve
   utilization and uptake of new knowledge and reference cases in which
   such uptake has been facilitated.}},
Publisher = {{BLACKWELL SCIENCE PUBL}},
Address = {{OSNEY MEAD, OXFORD OX2 0EL, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article; Book Chapter}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Apostolaki, P (Reprint Author), Ctr Environm Fisheries \& Aquaculture Sci, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.
   Apostolaki, Panayiota; Pilling, Graham M.; Armstrong, Michael J.; Metcalfe, Julian D.; Forster, Rodney, Ctr Environm Fisheries \& Aquaculture Sci, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.}},
DOI = {{10.1002/9781444302653.ch10}},
ISBN = {{978-1-4051-7083-3}},
Keywords = {{assimilation of new knowledge; communication; fisheries management; peer
   review; scientific advice; stakeholders; stock assessment; technological
   advances; uncertainty}},
Keywords-Plus = {{ATLANTIC BLUEFIN TUNA; NORTH-SEA PLAICE; POPULATION-STRUCTURE; MIGRATORY
   BEHAVIOR; MARINE FISHERIES; STOCK ASSESSMENT; EL-NINO; SCIENCE; COD;
   OCEAN}},
Research-Areas = {{Fisheries}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Fisheries}},
Author-Email = {{panayiota.apostolaki@cefas.co.uk}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{92}},
Times-Cited = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{2}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{BTV92}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000288205300012}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}

Downloads: 0