@article{askin_deduplication_2025,
	title = {Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews: practical insights to guide decision-making},
	volume = {25},
	issn = {1387-3741, 1572-9400},
	shorttitle = {Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews},
	url = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4},
	doi = {10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4},
	abstract = {When deciding on an appropriate software and/or methodology for deduplication of retrieved literature citations in systematic evidence synthesis, several factors ought to be considered, including the cost of a deduplication software, familiarity with its use, and the time necessary to conduct deduplication using a particular method. To guide researchers with and without knowledge of systematic evidence synthesis methods in making informed decisions, we sought to compare different commonly used deduplication software/methodologies—Covidence, Rayyan, the Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator, the Systematic Review Accelerator (SRA) Deduplicator, Deduklick, and the Bramer method in Endnote—from the perspectives of an experienced information specialist and a biomedical researcher. We summarized the cost, time, and effort required from each deduplication software/method and reported our findings descriptively. The findings suggest a properly balanced consideration between cost-effectiveness, ease of application of a method, context and researcher’s needs when deciding on deduplication method for systematic evidence synthesis.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2025-10-03},
	journal = {Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology},
	author = {Askin, Nicole and Okoli, George N.},
	month = jun,
	year = {2025},
	note = {0 citations (Crossref/DOI) [2024-09-11]},
	keywords = {\_annoté\_FF},
	pages = {214--221},
}

{"_id":"tytjJXtPLgjbdkNwk","bibbaseid":"askin-okoli-deduplicationmethodsforliteraturecitationsinsystematicevidencereviewspracticalinsightstoguidedecisionmaking-2025","author_short":["Askin, N.","Okoli, G. N."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews: practical insights to guide decision-making","volume":"25","issn":"1387-3741, 1572-9400","shorttitle":"Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews","url":"https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4","doi":"10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4","abstract":"When deciding on an appropriate software and/or methodology for deduplication of retrieved literature citations in systematic evidence synthesis, several factors ought to be considered, including the cost of a deduplication software, familiarity with its use, and the time necessary to conduct deduplication using a particular method. To guide researchers with and without knowledge of systematic evidence synthesis methods in making informed decisions, we sought to compare different commonly used deduplication software/methodologies—Covidence, Rayyan, the Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator, the Systematic Review Accelerator (SRA) Deduplicator, Deduklick, and the Bramer method in Endnote—from the perspectives of an experienced information specialist and a biomedical researcher. We summarized the cost, time, and effort required from each deduplication software/method and reported our findings descriptively. The findings suggest a properly balanced consideration between cost-effectiveness, ease of application of a method, context and researcher’s needs when deciding on deduplication method for systematic evidence synthesis.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2025-10-03","journal":"Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Askin"],"firstnames":["Nicole"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Okoli"],"firstnames":["George","N."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2025","note":"0 citations (Crossref/DOI) [2024-09-11]","keywords":"_annoté_FF","pages":"214–221","bibtex":"@article{askin_deduplication_2025,\n\ttitle = {Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews: practical insights to guide decision-making},\n\tvolume = {25},\n\tissn = {1387-3741, 1572-9400},\n\tshorttitle = {Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews},\n\turl = {https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4},\n\tabstract = {When deciding on an appropriate software and/or methodology for deduplication of retrieved literature citations in systematic evidence synthesis, several factors ought to be considered, including the cost of a deduplication software, familiarity with its use, and the time necessary to conduct deduplication using a particular method. To guide researchers with and without knowledge of systematic evidence synthesis methods in making informed decisions, we sought to compare different commonly used deduplication software/methodologies—Covidence, Rayyan, the Automated Systematic Search Deduplicator, the Systematic Review Accelerator (SRA) Deduplicator, Deduklick, and the Bramer method in Endnote—from the perspectives of an experienced information specialist and a biomedical researcher. We summarized the cost, time, and effort required from each deduplication software/method and reported our findings descriptively. The findings suggest a properly balanced consideration between cost-effectiveness, ease of application of a method, context and researcher’s needs when deciding on deduplication method for systematic evidence synthesis.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2025-10-03},\n\tjournal = {Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology},\n\tauthor = {Askin, Nicole and Okoli, George N.},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2025},\n\tnote = {0 citations (Crossref/DOI) [2024-09-11]},\n\tkeywords = {\\_annoté\\_FF},\n\tpages = {214--221},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Askin, N.","Okoli, G. N."],"key":"askin_deduplication_2025","id":"askin_deduplication_2025","bibbaseid":"askin-okoli-deduplicationmethodsforliteraturecitationsinsystematicevidencereviewspracticalinsightstoguidedecisionmaking-2025","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10742-024-00335-4"},"keyword":["_annoté_FF"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2233096/items?key=rCy7E0GkmFhOXB78i3c8F8Sm&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["hDfoTWMe7fEMeRgR9","zXnPFaELWSWS53n4g","dShEdNT7Rd3kFsqCx","Ncv7RbP24oZovD5Kd"],"keywords":["_annoté_ff"],"search_terms":["deduplication","methods","literature","citations","systematic","evidence","reviews","practical","insights","guide","decision","making","askin","okoli"],"title":"Deduplication methods for literature citations in systematic evidence reviews: practical insights to guide decision-making","year":2025}