The Performance of Different Propensity-Score Methods for Estimating Relative Risks. Austin, P. C. J Clin Epi, 61:537-545, 2008.
bibtex   
@article{aus08per,
  title = {The Performance of Different Propensity-Score Methods for Estimating Relative Risks},
  volume = {61},
  journal = {J Clin Epi},
  author = {Austin, Peter C.},
  year = {2008},
  keywords = {review,propensity-score,comparison},
  pages = {537-545},
  citeulike-article-id = {13265663},
  posted-at = {2014-07-14 14:10:01},
  priority = {0},
  annote = {MSE and bias of relative risk;quintile stratification vs. matching;covariate adjustment;"propensity-score matching resulted in estimates with less bias than did stratification on the quintiles of the propensity score, but stratification on the quintiles of the propensity score resulted in estimates with greater precision."}
}

Downloads: 0