Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?. Avis, M. Qualitative Health Research, 13(7):995–1004, 2003. bibtex*:Avisweneedmethodological2003doi abstract bibtex Positivism is frequently used to stand for the epistemological assumption that empirical science based on principles of verificationism, objectivity, and reproducibility is the foundation of all genuine knowledge. Qualitative researchers sometimes feel obliged to provide methodological alternatives to positivism that recognize their different ethical, ontological, and epistemological commitments and have provided three theories: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. The author argues that positivism was a doomed attempt to define empirical foundations for knowledge through a rigorous separation of theory and evidence; offers a pragmatic, coherent view of knowledge; and suggests that rigorous, rational empirical investigation does not need methodological theory. Therefore, qualitative methodological theory is unnecessary and counterproductive because it hinders critical reflection on the relation between methodological theory and empirical evidence.
@article{avis_we_2003,
title = {Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?},
volume = {13},
doi = {10.1177/1049732303253298},
abstract = {Positivism is frequently used to stand for the epistemological assumption that empirical science based on principles of verificationism, objectivity, and reproducibility is the foundation of all genuine knowledge. Qualitative researchers sometimes feel obliged to provide methodological alternatives to positivism that recognize their different ethical, ontological, and epistemological commitments and have provided three theories: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. The author argues that positivism was a doomed attempt to define empirical foundations for knowledge through a rigorous separation of theory and evidence; offers a pragmatic, coherent view of knowledge; and suggests that rigorous, rational empirical investigation does not need methodological theory. Therefore, qualitative methodological theory is unnecessary and counterproductive because it hinders critical reflection on the relation between methodological theory and empirical evidence.},
number = {7},
journal = {Qualitative Health Research},
author = {Avis, Mark},
year = {2003},
note = {bibtex*:Avisweneedmethodological2003},
keywords = {Epistemologia, metodologia, positivismo, validade},
pages = {995--1004},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"NiGBsqrScs5k3prjq","bibbaseid":"avis-doweneedmethodologicaltheorytodoqualitativeresearch-2003","author_short":["Avis, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?","volume":"13","doi":"10.1177/1049732303253298","abstract":"Positivism is frequently used to stand for the epistemological assumption that empirical science based on principles of verificationism, objectivity, and reproducibility is the foundation of all genuine knowledge. Qualitative researchers sometimes feel obliged to provide methodological alternatives to positivism that recognize their different ethical, ontological, and epistemological commitments and have provided three theories: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. The author argues that positivism was a doomed attempt to define empirical foundations for knowledge through a rigorous separation of theory and evidence; offers a pragmatic, coherent view of knowledge; and suggests that rigorous, rational empirical investigation does not need methodological theory. Therefore, qualitative methodological theory is unnecessary and counterproductive because it hinders critical reflection on the relation between methodological theory and empirical evidence.","number":"7","journal":"Qualitative Health Research","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Avis"],"firstnames":["Mark"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2003","note":"bibtex*:Avisweneedmethodological2003","keywords":"Epistemologia, metodologia, positivismo, validade","pages":"995–1004","bibtex":"@article{avis_we_2003,\n\ttitle = {Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?},\n\tvolume = {13},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/1049732303253298},\n\tabstract = {Positivism is frequently used to stand for the epistemological assumption that empirical science based on principles of verificationism, objectivity, and reproducibility is the foundation of all genuine knowledge. Qualitative researchers sometimes feel obliged to provide methodological alternatives to positivism that recognize their different ethical, ontological, and epistemological commitments and have provided three theories: phenomenology, grounded theory, and ethnography. The author argues that positivism was a doomed attempt to define empirical foundations for knowledge through a rigorous separation of theory and evidence; offers a pragmatic, coherent view of knowledge; and suggests that rigorous, rational empirical investigation does not need methodological theory. Therefore, qualitative methodological theory is unnecessary and counterproductive because it hinders critical reflection on the relation between methodological theory and empirical evidence.},\n\tnumber = {7},\n\tjournal = {Qualitative Health Research},\n\tauthor = {Avis, Mark},\n\tyear = {2003},\n\tnote = {bibtex*:Avisweneedmethodological2003},\n\tkeywords = {Epistemologia, metodologia, positivismo, validade},\n\tpages = {995--1004},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Avis, M."],"key":"avis_we_2003","id":"avis_we_2003","bibbaseid":"avis-doweneedmethodologicaltheorytodoqualitativeresearch-2003","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Epistemologia","metodologia","positivismo","validade"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/brunocpt","dataSources":["9N7FyBLqJ5Q2Suqzs"],"keywords":["epistemologia","metodologia","positivismo","validade"],"search_terms":["need","methodological","theory","qualitative","research","avis"],"title":"Do we need methodological theory to do qualitative research?","year":2003}