Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. Bach, E., Sant'Anna, F., H., dos Passos, J., F., M., Balsanelli, E., de Baura, V., A., Pedrosa, F., d., O., de Souza, E., M., & Passaglia, L., M., P. Pathogens and Disease, 8, 2017. ![Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website abstract bibtex The correct identification of bacteria from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is crucial for epidemiological studies and treatment of cystic fibrosis infections. However, genome-based identification tools are revealing many controversial Bcc species assignments. The aim of this work is to re-examine the taxonomic position of the soil bacterium B. cepacia 89 through polyphasic and genomic approaches. recA and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis positioned strain 89 inside the Bcc group. However, based on the divergence score of seven concatenated allele sequences, and values of average nucleotide identity, and digital DNA:DNA hybridization, our results suggest that strain 89 is different from other Bcc species formerly described. Thus, we propose to classify Burkholderia sp. 89 as the novel species Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. with strain 89T (=DSM 103188T = BR 10601T) as the type strain. Moreover, our results call the attention to some probable misidentifications of Bcc genomes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.
@article{
title = {Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov.},
type = {article},
year = {2017},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
keywords = {ANI,Burkholderia catarinensis,Burkholderia cepacia complex,Genome,MLSA,Misidentification},
volume = {75},
websites = {https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/femspd/ftx076},
month = {8},
id = {c013e710-b6b7-314e-b7a7-c0d63c6e0e17},
created = {2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {81a97cb0-31b8-3385-bd0e-efcfffedaada},
group_id = {b954b4a7-36ce-39f9-9501-2e3795a979e9},
last_modified = {2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Bach2017},
source_type = {article},
language = {en},
notes = {CAPES qualis 2013-2016 CB I: B1},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {The correct identification of bacteria from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is crucial for epidemiological studies and treatment of cystic fibrosis infections. However, genome-based identification tools are revealing many controversial Bcc species assignments. The aim of this work is to re-examine the taxonomic position of the soil bacterium B. cepacia 89 through polyphasic and genomic approaches. recA and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis positioned strain 89 inside the Bcc group. However, based on the divergence score of seven concatenated allele sequences, and values of average nucleotide identity, and digital DNA:DNA hybridization, our results suggest that strain 89 is different from other Bcc species formerly described. Thus, we propose to classify Burkholderia sp. 89 as the novel species Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. with strain 89T (=DSM 103188T = BR 10601T) as the type strain. Moreover, our results call the attention to some probable misidentifications of Bcc genomes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Bach, Evelise and Sant'Anna, Fernando Hayashi and dos Passos, João Frederico Magrich and Balsanelli, Eduardo and de Baura, Valter Antonio and Pedrosa, Fábio de Oliveira and de Souza, Emanuel Maltempi and Passaglia, Luciane Maria Pereira},
journal = {Pathogens and Disease},
number = {6}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"AMEfRhbaZXSi8DtgQ","bibbaseid":"bach-santanna-dospassos-balsanelli-debaura-pedrosa-desouza-passaglia-detectionofmisidentificationsofspeciesfromtheburkholderiacepaciacomplexanddescriptionofanewmemberthesoilbacteriumburkholderiacatarinensisspnov-2017","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Bach, E.","Sant'Anna, F., H.","dos Passos, J., F., M.","Balsanelli, E.","de Baura, V., A.","Pedrosa, F., d., O.","de Souza, E., M.","Passaglia, L., M., P."],"bibdata":{"title":"Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov.","type":"article","year":"2017","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"ANI,Burkholderia catarinensis,Burkholderia cepacia complex,Genome,MLSA,Misidentification","volume":"75","websites":"https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/femspd/ftx076","month":"8","id":"c013e710-b6b7-314e-b7a7-c0d63c6e0e17","created":"2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"81a97cb0-31b8-3385-bd0e-efcfffedaada","group_id":"b954b4a7-36ce-39f9-9501-2e3795a979e9","last_modified":"2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Bach2017","source_type":"article","language":"en","notes":"CAPES qualis 2013-2016 CB I: B1","private_publication":false,"abstract":"The correct identification of bacteria from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is crucial for epidemiological studies and treatment of cystic fibrosis infections. However, genome-based identification tools are revealing many controversial Bcc species assignments. The aim of this work is to re-examine the taxonomic position of the soil bacterium B. cepacia 89 through polyphasic and genomic approaches. recA and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis positioned strain 89 inside the Bcc group. However, based on the divergence score of seven concatenated allele sequences, and values of average nucleotide identity, and digital DNA:DNA hybridization, our results suggest that strain 89 is different from other Bcc species formerly described. Thus, we propose to classify Burkholderia sp. 89 as the novel species Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. with strain 89T (=DSM 103188T = BR 10601T) as the type strain. Moreover, our results call the attention to some probable misidentifications of Bcc genomes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.","bibtype":"article","author":"Bach, Evelise and Sant'Anna, Fernando Hayashi and dos Passos, João Frederico Magrich and Balsanelli, Eduardo and de Baura, Valter Antonio and Pedrosa, Fábio de Oliveira and de Souza, Emanuel Maltempi and Passaglia, Luciane Maria Pereira","journal":"Pathogens and Disease","number":"6","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov.},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {ANI,Burkholderia catarinensis,Burkholderia cepacia complex,Genome,MLSA,Misidentification},\n volume = {75},\n websites = {https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/femspd/ftx076},\n month = {8},\n id = {c013e710-b6b7-314e-b7a7-c0d63c6e0e17},\n created = {2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {81a97cb0-31b8-3385-bd0e-efcfffedaada},\n group_id = {b954b4a7-36ce-39f9-9501-2e3795a979e9},\n last_modified = {2019-02-04T15:29:29.918Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Bach2017},\n source_type = {article},\n language = {en},\n notes = {CAPES qualis 2013-2016 CB I: B1},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {The correct identification of bacteria from the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) is crucial for epidemiological studies and treatment of cystic fibrosis infections. However, genome-based identification tools are revealing many controversial Bcc species assignments. The aim of this work is to re-examine the taxonomic position of the soil bacterium B. cepacia 89 through polyphasic and genomic approaches. recA and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis positioned strain 89 inside the Bcc group. However, based on the divergence score of seven concatenated allele sequences, and values of average nucleotide identity, and digital DNA:DNA hybridization, our results suggest that strain 89 is different from other Bcc species formerly described. Thus, we propose to classify Burkholderia sp. 89 as the novel species Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. with strain 89T (=DSM 103188T = BR 10601T) as the type strain. Moreover, our results call the attention to some probable misidentifications of Bcc genomes at the National Center for Biotechnology Information database.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Bach, Evelise and Sant'Anna, Fernando Hayashi and dos Passos, João Frederico Magrich and Balsanelli, Eduardo and de Baura, Valter Antonio and Pedrosa, Fábio de Oliveira and de Souza, Emanuel Maltempi and Passaglia, Luciane Maria Pereira},\n journal = {Pathogens and Disease},\n number = {6}\n}","author_short":["Bach, E.","Sant'Anna, F., H.","dos Passos, J., F., M.","Balsanelli, E.","de Baura, V., A.","Pedrosa, F., d., O.","de Souza, E., M.","Passaglia, L., M., P."],"urls":{"Website":"https://academic.oup.com/femspd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/femspd/ftx076"},"bibbaseid":"bach-santanna-dospassos-balsanelli-debaura-pedrosa-desouza-passaglia-detectionofmisidentificationsofspeciesfromtheburkholderiacepaciacomplexanddescriptionofanewmemberthesoilbacteriumburkholderiacatarinensisspnov-2017","role":"author","keyword":["ANI","Burkholderia catarinensis","Burkholderia cepacia complex","Genome","MLSA","Misidentification"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2020-04-24T03:45:31.744Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["ani","burkholderia catarinensis","burkholderia cepacia complex","genome","mlsa","misidentification"],"search_terms":["detection","misidentifications","species","burkholderia","cepacia","complex","description","new","member","soil","bacterium","burkholderia","catarinensis","nov","bach","sant'anna","dos passos","balsanelli","de baura","pedrosa","de souza","passaglia"],"title":"Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov.","year":2017}