SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Baethge, C., Goldbeck-Wood, S., & Mertens, S. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1):5, March, 2019.
SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Narrative reviews are the commonest type of articles in the medical literature. However, unlike systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCT) articles, for which formal instruments exist to evaluate quality, there is currently no instrument available to assess the quality of narrative reviews. In response to this gap, we developed SANRA, the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles.
@article{baethge_sanrascale_2019,
	title = {{SANRA}—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles},
	volume = {4},
	issn = {2058-8615},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8},
	doi = {10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8},
	abstract = {Narrative reviews are the commonest type of articles in the medical literature. However, unlike systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCT) articles, for which formal instruments exist to evaluate quality, there is currently no instrument available to assess the quality of narrative reviews. In response to this gap, we developed SANRA, the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2024-09-04},
	journal = {Research Integrity and Peer Review},
	author = {Baethge, Christopher and Goldbeck-Wood, Sandra and Mertens, Stephan},
	month = mar,
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {Agreement, Cronbach’s alpha, Internal consistency, Intra-class correlation coefficient, Item-total correlation, Narrative review articles, Non-systematic review articles, Periodicals as topic, Reliability, SANRA},
	pages = {5},
}

Downloads: 0