Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications. Bagley, M. N. & Mokhtarian, P. L. Transportation, 24(3):203–226, August, 1997. ![Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex This study examines three models of the individual's preference for home- and center-based telecommuting. Issues concerning the estimation of discrete models when the alternatives are non-exclusive are discussed. Two binary logit models are presented, one on the preference to telecommute from a center versus not telecommuting from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.24), and the other on the preference to telecommute from a center over telecommuting from home (adjusted ρ2 = 0.64). A nested logit model is also estimated on the following four alternatives: preferring not to telecommute, preferring either form of telecommuting, preferring to telecommute from home, and preferring to telecommute from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.35).The results of the models illustrated the importance of attitudinal measures in measuring an individual's preference to telecommute. Oblique factor scores representing workplace interaction, stress, workaholism, internal control, and commute stress were statistically significant in some or all of the models. Other explanatory variables which were found to be consistently significant were education, job suitability, and age. Most respondents preferred either to telecommute from home or were indifferent between either form of telecommuting, which raises the question as to whether there really is a sizeable market niche to be filled by telecommuting centers, and hence whether they may make a significant contribution to transportation demand reduction.
@article{bagley_analyzing_1997,
title = {Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: {Modeling} and policy implications},
volume = {24},
issn = {1572-9435},
shorttitle = {Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924601411},
doi = {10.1023/A:1004924601411},
abstract = {This study examines three models of the individual's preference for home- and center-based telecommuting. Issues concerning the estimation of discrete models when the alternatives are non-exclusive are discussed. Two binary logit models are presented, one on the preference to telecommute from a center versus not telecommuting from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.24), and the other on the preference to telecommute from a center over telecommuting from home (adjusted ρ2 = 0.64). A nested logit model is also estimated on the following four alternatives: preferring not to telecommute, preferring either form of telecommuting, preferring to telecommute from home, and preferring to telecommute from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.35).The results of the models illustrated the importance of attitudinal measures in measuring an individual's preference to telecommute. Oblique factor scores representing workplace interaction, stress, workaholism, internal control, and commute stress were statistically significant in some or all of the models. Other explanatory variables which were found to be consistently significant were education, job suitability, and age. Most respondents preferred either to telecommute from home or were indifferent between either form of telecommuting, which raises the question as to whether there really is a sizeable market niche to be filled by telecommuting centers, and hence whether they may make a significant contribution to transportation demand reduction.},
language = {en},
number = {3},
urldate = {2019-04-30},
journal = {Transportation},
author = {Bagley, Michael N. and Mokhtarian, Patricia L.},
month = aug,
year = {1997},
keywords = {home-based telecommuting, preference model, telecommuting center},
pages = {203--226}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"5QRwrFchdBxkHgv7X","bibbaseid":"bagley-mokhtarian-analyzingthepreferencefornonexclusiveformsoftelecommutingmodelingandpolicyimplications-1997","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Bagley, M. N.","Mokhtarian, P. L."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications","volume":"24","issn":"1572-9435","shorttitle":"Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting","url":"https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924601411","doi":"10.1023/A:1004924601411","abstract":"This study examines three models of the individual's preference for home- and center-based telecommuting. Issues concerning the estimation of discrete models when the alternatives are non-exclusive are discussed. Two binary logit models are presented, one on the preference to telecommute from a center versus not telecommuting from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.24), and the other on the preference to telecommute from a center over telecommuting from home (adjusted ρ2 = 0.64). A nested logit model is also estimated on the following four alternatives: preferring not to telecommute, preferring either form of telecommuting, preferring to telecommute from home, and preferring to telecommute from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.35).The results of the models illustrated the importance of attitudinal measures in measuring an individual's preference to telecommute. Oblique factor scores representing workplace interaction, stress, workaholism, internal control, and commute stress were statistically significant in some or all of the models. Other explanatory variables which were found to be consistently significant were education, job suitability, and age. Most respondents preferred either to telecommute from home or were indifferent between either form of telecommuting, which raises the question as to whether there really is a sizeable market niche to be filled by telecommuting centers, and hence whether they may make a significant contribution to transportation demand reduction.","language":"en","number":"3","urldate":"2019-04-30","journal":"Transportation","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bagley"],"firstnames":["Michael","N."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mokhtarian"],"firstnames":["Patricia","L."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"August","year":"1997","keywords":"home-based telecommuting, preference model, telecommuting center","pages":"203–226","bibtex":"@article{bagley_analyzing_1997,\n\ttitle = {Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: {Modeling} and policy implications},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\tissn = {1572-9435},\n\tshorttitle = {Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924601411},\n\tdoi = {10.1023/A:1004924601411},\n\tabstract = {This study examines three models of the individual's preference for home- and center-based telecommuting. Issues concerning the estimation of discrete models when the alternatives are non-exclusive are discussed. Two binary logit models are presented, one on the preference to telecommute from a center versus not telecommuting from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.24), and the other on the preference to telecommute from a center over telecommuting from home (adjusted ρ2 = 0.64). A nested logit model is also estimated on the following four alternatives: preferring not to telecommute, preferring either form of telecommuting, preferring to telecommute from home, and preferring to telecommute from a center (adjusted ρ2 = 0.35).The results of the models illustrated the importance of attitudinal measures in measuring an individual's preference to telecommute. Oblique factor scores representing workplace interaction, stress, workaholism, internal control, and commute stress were statistically significant in some or all of the models. Other explanatory variables which were found to be consistently significant were education, job suitability, and age. Most respondents preferred either to telecommute from home or were indifferent between either form of telecommuting, which raises the question as to whether there really is a sizeable market niche to be filled by telecommuting centers, and hence whether they may make a significant contribution to transportation demand reduction.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2019-04-30},\n\tjournal = {Transportation},\n\tauthor = {Bagley, Michael N. and Mokhtarian, Patricia L.},\n\tmonth = aug,\n\tyear = {1997},\n\tkeywords = {home-based telecommuting, preference model, telecommuting center},\n\tpages = {203--226}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bagley, M. N.","Mokhtarian, P. L."],"key":"bagley_analyzing_1997","id":"bagley_analyzing_1997","bibbaseid":"bagley-mokhtarian-analyzingthepreferencefornonexclusiveformsoftelecommutingmodelingandpolicyimplications-1997","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004924601411"},"keyword":["home-based telecommuting","preference model","telecommuting center"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/4548732/collections/LNXLWAV7/items?key=GSzhzZJMwfFi2xy72gVJaMBi&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2019-05-29T01:55:55.225Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["home-based telecommuting","preference model","telecommuting center"],"search_terms":["analyzing","preference","non","exclusive","forms","telecommuting","modeling","policy","implications","bagley","mokhtarian"],"title":"Analyzing the preference for non-exclusive forms of telecommuting: Modeling and policy implications","year":1997,"dataSources":["8zzaXyqNbmvuxCTS7"]}