Performance comparison of VxWorks, Linux, RTAI, and Xenomai in a hard real-time application. Barbalace, A., Luchetta, A., Manduchi, G., Moro, M., Soppelsa, A., & Taliercio, C. 55(1):435–439, IEEE.
bibtex   
@Article{barbalace08performance,
  author       = {Barbalace, Antonio and Luchetta, Adriano and Manduchi, Gabriele and Moro, Michele and Soppelsa, Anton and Taliercio, Cesare},
  date         = {2008},
  journaltitle = {IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science},
  title        = {Performance comparison of VxWorks, Linux, RTAI, and Xenomai in a hard real-time application},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {435--439},
  volume       = {55},
  comment      = {* motivation

  * ? can Linux be used for real-time applications

* work with Linux 2.6
* list limitations of Linux for real-time applications

  * *dynamic* priorities
  * paging
  * MMU remapping (→ jitter)
  * non-preemptive kernel (→ jitter)

* measured interrupt latencies

  * for Linux, VxWorks, RTAI and Xenomai
  * once with interrupt handling directly in ISR
  * once with interrupt handling in separate kernel task

* otherwise not really related to our work},
  file         = {:barbalace08performance - Performance comparison of VxWorks, Linux, RTAI, and Xenomai in a hard real-time application.pdf:PDF},
  groups       = {trippertos},
  publisher    = {IEEE},
  timestamp    = {2020-07-25},
}

Downloads: 0