A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: Chinese perspective. Barra, M., Remák, E., Liu, D. D., Xie, L., Abraham, L., & Sadosky, A. B. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, 11:169–177, February, 2019. ![A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: Chinese perspective [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Purpose The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China. Methods A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P\textless0.0001]) compared with opioids alone for the 3-day postoperative period. This suggested a potential savings of 356 Chinese yuan (¥) per patient over the 3 days (total cost of ¥1,418 for parecoxib plus opioids vs ¥1,774 with opioid use alone). Conclusion Fewer CMEs with parecoxib plus opioids suggest a reduction in medical resource utilization and reduced costs compared to opioids alone when modeling analgesic use in non-cardiac surgery patients in China.
@article{barra_cost-consequence_2019-1,
title = {A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: {Chinese} perspective},
volume = {11},
issn = {1178-6981},
shorttitle = {A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390864/},
doi = {10.2147/CEOR.S183404},
abstract = {Purpose The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China. Methods A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P{\textbackslash}textless0.0001]) compared with opioids alone for the 3-day postoperative period. This suggested a potential savings of 356 Chinese yuan (¥) per patient over the 3 days (total cost of ¥1,418 for parecoxib plus opioids vs ¥1,774 with opioid use alone). Conclusion Fewer CMEs with parecoxib plus opioids suggest a reduction in medical resource utilization and reduced costs compared to opioids alone when modeling analgesic use in non-cardiac surgery patients in China.},
urldate = {2019-09-17},
journal = {ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR},
author = {Barra, M. and Remák, E. and Liu, D. D. and Xie, L. and Abraham, L. and Sadosky, A. B.},
month = feb,
year = {2019},
pmid = {30863130},
pmcid = {PMC6390864},
pages = {169--177},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"HD5TEK83Qkv9SNWca","bibbaseid":"barra-remk-liu-xie-abraham-sadosky-acostconsequenceanalysisofparecoxibandopioidsvsopioidsaloneforpostoperativepainchineseperspective-2019","author_short":["Barra, M.","Remák, E.","Liu, D. D.","Xie, L.","Abraham, L.","Sadosky, A. B."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: Chinese perspective","volume":"11","issn":"1178-6981","shorttitle":"A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain","url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390864/","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S183404","abstract":"Purpose The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China. Methods A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P\\textless0.0001]) compared with opioids alone for the 3-day postoperative period. This suggested a potential savings of 356 Chinese yuan (¥) per patient over the 3 days (total cost of ¥1,418 for parecoxib plus opioids vs ¥1,774 with opioid use alone). Conclusion Fewer CMEs with parecoxib plus opioids suggest a reduction in medical resource utilization and reduced costs compared to opioids alone when modeling analgesic use in non-cardiac surgery patients in China.","urldate":"2019-09-17","journal":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Barra"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Remák"],"firstnames":["E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Liu"],"firstnames":["D.","D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Xie"],"firstnames":["L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Abraham"],"firstnames":["L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sadosky"],"firstnames":["A.","B."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"February","year":"2019","pmid":"30863130","pmcid":"PMC6390864","pages":"169–177","bibtex":"@article{barra_cost-consequence_2019-1,\n\ttitle = {A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: {Chinese} perspective},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tissn = {1178-6981},\n\tshorttitle = {A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain},\n\turl = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390864/},\n\tdoi = {10.2147/CEOR.S183404},\n\tabstract = {Purpose The use of parecoxib plus opioids for postoperative analgesia in noncardiac surgical patients seems to be cost-saving in Europe due to a reduction in opioid use and opioid-related adverse events. Given the lack of information on postoperative analgesic use in Asia, this study assessed the economic consequences of the addition of parecoxib to opioids vs opioids alone to treat postsurgical pain in China. Methods A cost-consequence economic evaluation assessed direct medical costs related to opioid-related clinically meaningful events (CMEs) utilizing dosing information and reported frequency of events from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, global clinical trial (PARA-0505-069) of parecoxib plus opioids vs opioids alone for 3 days following major orthopedic, abdominal, gynecologic, or noncardiac thoracic surgery requiring general or regional anesthesia. The cost of CMEs was calculated using information on resource utilization and unit costs provided by a panel of clinical experts in China. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. Results Patients treated with parecoxib plus opioids reported fewer CMEs (mean 0.62 vs 1.04 events per patient [P{\\textbackslash}textless0.0001]) compared with opioids alone for the 3-day postoperative period. This suggested a potential savings of 356 Chinese yuan (¥) per patient over the 3 days (total cost of ¥1,418 for parecoxib plus opioids vs ¥1,774 with opioid use alone). Conclusion Fewer CMEs with parecoxib plus opioids suggest a reduction in medical resource utilization and reduced costs compared to opioids alone when modeling analgesic use in non-cardiac surgery patients in China.},\n\turldate = {2019-09-17},\n\tjournal = {ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR},\n\tauthor = {Barra, M. and Remák, E. and Liu, D. D. and Xie, L. and Abraham, L. and Sadosky, A. B.},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tpmid = {30863130},\n\tpmcid = {PMC6390864},\n\tpages = {169--177},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Barra, M.","Remák, E.","Liu, D. D.","Xie, L.","Abraham, L.","Sadosky, A. B."],"bibbaseid":"barra-remk-liu-xie-abraham-sadosky-acostconsequenceanalysisofparecoxibandopioidsvsopioidsaloneforpostoperativepainchineseperspective-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6390864/"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/FfNE7kWA6pCvwcJZF/myPubs.bib","dataSources":["ZaHtWavQhcwZqKLNF","iRRNaRs6FkffgErta","zeMwFvgpdRkYAkfoD","v8uQmZsBpiqycmskv"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["cost","consequence","analysis","parecoxib","opioids","opioids","alone","postoperative","pain","chinese","perspective","barra","remák","liu","xie","abraham","sadosky"],"title":"A cost-consequence analysis of parecoxib and opioids vs opioids alone for postoperative pain: Chinese perspective","year":2019}