The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-Production: The Case of Urban Redesign in Vienna

The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-Production: The Case of Urban Redesign in Vienna. Bartenberger, M. & Sześciło, D. Public Administration, December, 2015.

Paper doi abstract bibtex

Building on the literature on co-production and the (pragmatist) literature on experimentalist policy-making we introduce and evaluate a novel form of co-production: experimental co-production. We propose a model of this specific form including a list of not only potential benefits but also possible risks and costs. We illustrate and examine this model of experimental co-production by drawing on the case study of a major urban planning initiative in Vienna, Austria that included an experimental co-testing phase. We find that while the expected benefits of experimental co-production were partly realized for the citizens involved, the city government faced major political costs.

@article{bartenberger_benefits_2015,
	title = {The {Benefits} and {Risks} of {Experimental} {Co}-{Production}: {The} {Case} of {Urban} {Redesign} in {Vienna}},
	copyright = {© 2015 John Wiley \& Sons Ltd},
	issn = {1467-9299},
	shorttitle = {The {Benefits} and {Risks} of {Experimental} {Co}-{Production}},
	url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12233/abstract},
	doi = {10.1111/padm.12233},
	abstract = {Building on the literature on co-production and the (pragmatist) literature on experimentalist policy-making we introduce and evaluate a novel form of co-production: experimental co-production. We propose a model of this specific form including a list of not only potential benefits but also possible risks and costs. We illustrate and examine this model of experimental co-production by drawing on the case study of a major urban planning initiative in Vienna, Austria that included an experimental co-testing phase. We find that while the expected benefits of experimental co-production were partly realized for the citizens involved, the city government faced major political costs.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2015-12-22},
	journal = {Public Administration},
	author = {Bartenberger, Martin and Sześciło, Dawid},
	month = dec,
	year = {2015},
	pages = {n/a--n/a},
	file = {Snapshot:files/53100/abstract.html:text/html}
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"CP3rxAAksPW3N8gnC","bibbaseid":"bartenberger-szecio-thebenefitsandrisksofexperimentalcoproductionthecaseofurbanredesigninvienna-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:35.185Z","title":"The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-Production: The Case of Urban Redesign in Vienna","author_short":["Bartenberger, M.","Sześciło, D."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-Production: The Case of Urban Redesign in Vienna","copyright":"© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd","issn":"1467-9299","shorttitle":"The Benefits and Risks of Experimental Co-Production","url":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12233/abstract","doi":"10.1111/padm.12233","abstract":"Building on the literature on co-production and the (pragmatist) literature on experimentalist policy-making we introduce and evaluate a novel form of co-production: experimental co-production. We propose a model of this specific form including a list of not only potential benefits but also possible risks and costs. We illustrate and examine this model of experimental co-production by drawing on the case study of a major urban planning initiative in Vienna, Austria that included an experimental co-testing phase. We find that while the expected benefits of experimental co-production were partly realized for the citizens involved, the city government faced major political costs.","language":"en","urldate":"2015-12-22","journal":"Public Administration","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bartenberger"],"firstnames":["Martin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sześciło"],"firstnames":["Dawid"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2015","pages":"n/a--n/a","file":"Snapshot:files/53100/abstract.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{bartenberger_benefits_2015,\n\ttitle = {The {Benefits} and {Risks} of {Experimental} {Co}-{Production}: {The} {Case} of {Urban} {Redesign} in {Vienna}},\n\tcopyright = {© 2015 John Wiley \\& Sons Ltd},\n\tissn = {1467-9299},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Benefits} and {Risks} of {Experimental} {Co}-{Production}},\n\turl = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12233/abstract},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/padm.12233},\n\tabstract = {Building on the literature on co-production and the (pragmatist) literature on experimentalist policy-making we introduce and evaluate a novel form of co-production: experimental co-production. We propose a model of this specific form including a list of not only potential benefits but also possible risks and costs. We illustrate and examine this model of experimental co-production by drawing on the case study of a major urban planning initiative in Vienna, Austria that included an experimental co-testing phase. We find that while the expected benefits of experimental co-production were partly realized for the citizens involved, the city government faced major political costs.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2015-12-22},\n\tjournal = {Public Administration},\n\tauthor = {Bartenberger, Martin and Sześciło, Dawid},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {n/a--n/a},\n\tfile = {Snapshot:files/53100/abstract.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bartenberger, M.","Sześciło, D."],"key":"bartenberger_benefits_2015","id":"bartenberger_benefits_2015","bibbaseid":"bartenberger-szecio-thebenefitsandrisksofexperimentalcoproductionthecaseofurbanredesigninvienna-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12233/abstract"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["benefits","risks","experimental","production","case","urban","redesign","vienna","bartenberger","sześciło"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}