Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach. Bartlett, L. & Vavrus, F. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), July, 2017. Number: 1![Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex What is a case study and what is it good for? In this article, we argue for a new approach—the comparative case study approach—that attends simultaneously to macro, meso, and micro dimensions of case-based research. The approach engages two logics of comparison: first, the more common compare and contrast; and second, a ‘tracing across’ sites or scales. As we explicate our approach, we also contrast it to traditional case study research. We contend that new approaches are necessitated by conceptual shifts in the social sciences, specifically in relation to culture, context, space, place, and comparison itself. We propose that comparative case studies should attend to three axes: horizontal, vertical, and transversal comparison. We conclude by arguing that this revision has the potential to strengthen and enhance case study research in Comparative and International Education, clarifying the unique contributions of qualitative research. 【摘要翻译】什么是案例研究，这有什么好处？在本文中，我们提出了一种新方法（比较案例研究方法），该方法同时参加了基于案例研究的宏，中索和微观维度。该方法与比较的两种逻辑有关：首先，更常见的比较和对比；其次，一个“跨越”站点或秤的“追踪”。当我们阐明方法时，我们也将其与传统案例研究进行对比。我们认为，社会科学的概念转变，特别是与文化，背景，空间，地点和比较本身有关的新方法。我们建议比较案例研究应参与三个轴：水平，垂直和横向比较。我们结论是，这项修订有可能加强和增强比较和国际教育中的案例研究，从而阐明定性研究的独特贡献。
@article{bartlett_comparative_2017,
title = {Comparative {Case} {Studies}: {An} {Innovative} {Approach}},
volume = {1},
copyright = {Copyright (c) 2017 Lesley Bartlett},
issn = {2535-4051},
shorttitle = {比较案例研究：一种创新的方法},
url = {https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/nordiccie/article/view/1929},
doi = {10.7577/njcie.1929},
abstract = {What is a case study and what is it good for? In this article, we argue for a new approach—the comparative case study approach—that attends simultaneously to macro, meso, and micro dimensions of case-based research. The approach engages two logics of comparison: first, the more common compare and contrast; and second, a ‘tracing across’ sites or scales. As we explicate our approach, we also contrast it to traditional case study research. We contend that new approaches are necessitated by conceptual shifts in the social sciences, specifically in relation to culture, context, space, place, and comparison itself. We propose that comparative case studies should attend to three axes: horizontal, vertical, and transversal comparison. We conclude by arguing that this revision has the potential to strengthen and enhance case study research in Comparative and International Education, clarifying the unique contributions of qualitative research.
【摘要翻译】什么是案例研究，这有什么好处？在本文中，我们提出了一种新方法（比较案例研究方法），该方法同时参加了基于案例研究的宏，中索和微观维度。该方法与比较的两种逻辑有关：首先，更常见的比较和对比；其次，一个“跨越”站点或秤的“追踪”。当我们阐明方法时，我们也将其与传统案例研究进行对比。我们认为，社会科学的概念转变，特别是与文化，背景，空间，地点和比较本身有关的新方法。我们建议比较案例研究应参与三个轴：水平，垂直和横向比较。我们结论是，这项修订有可能加强和增强比较和国际教育中的案例研究，从而阐明定性研究的独特贡献。},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2023-04-26},
journal = {Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)},
author = {Bartlett, Lesley and Vavrus, Frances},
month = jul,
year = {2017},
note = {Number: 1},
keywords = {/unread, case study, comparison, context, research methods},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"uiJKWRWFFFzrd8t5k","bibbaseid":"bartlett-vavrus-comparativecasestudiesaninnovativeapproach-2017","author_short":["Bartlett, L.","Vavrus, F."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach","volume":"1","copyright":"Copyright (c) 2017 Lesley Bartlett","issn":"2535-4051","shorttitle":"比较案例研究：一种创新的方法","url":"https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/nordiccie/article/view/1929","doi":"10.7577/njcie.1929","abstract":"What is a case study and what is it good for? In this article, we argue for a new approach—the comparative case study approach—that attends simultaneously to macro, meso, and micro dimensions of case-based research. The approach engages two logics of comparison: first, the more common compare and contrast; and second, a ‘tracing across’ sites or scales. As we explicate our approach, we also contrast it to traditional case study research. We contend that new approaches are necessitated by conceptual shifts in the social sciences, specifically in relation to culture, context, space, place, and comparison itself. We propose that comparative case studies should attend to three axes: horizontal, vertical, and transversal comparison. We conclude by arguing that this revision has the potential to strengthen and enhance case study research in Comparative and International Education, clarifying the unique contributions of qualitative research. 【摘要翻译】什么是案例研究，这有什么好处？在本文中，我们提出了一种新方法（比较案例研究方法），该方法同时参加了基于案例研究的宏，中索和微观维度。该方法与比较的两种逻辑有关：首先，更常见的比较和对比；其次，一个“跨越”站点或秤的“追踪”。当我们阐明方法时，我们也将其与传统案例研究进行对比。我们认为，社会科学的概念转变，特别是与文化，背景，空间，地点和比较本身有关的新方法。我们建议比较案例研究应参与三个轴：水平，垂直和横向比较。我们结论是，这项修订有可能加强和增强比较和国际教育中的案例研究，从而阐明定性研究的独特贡献。","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2023-04-26","journal":"Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bartlett"],"firstnames":["Lesley"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Vavrus"],"firstnames":["Frances"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2017","note":"Number: 1","keywords":"/unread, case study, comparison, context, research methods","bibtex":"@article{bartlett_comparative_2017,\n\ttitle = {Comparative {Case} {Studies}: {An} {Innovative} {Approach}},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright (c) 2017 Lesley Bartlett},\n\tissn = {2535-4051},\n\tshorttitle = {比较案例研究：一种创新的方法},\n\turl = {https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/nordiccie/article/view/1929},\n\tdoi = {10.7577/njcie.1929},\n\tabstract = {What is a case study and what is it good for? In this article, we argue for a new approach—the comparative case study approach—that attends simultaneously to macro, meso, and micro dimensions of case-based research. The approach engages two logics of comparison: first, the more common compare and contrast; and second, a ‘tracing across’ sites or scales. As we explicate our approach, we also contrast it to traditional case study research. We contend that new approaches are necessitated by conceptual shifts in the social sciences, specifically in relation to culture, context, space, place, and comparison itself. We propose that comparative case studies should attend to three axes: horizontal, vertical, and transversal comparison. We conclude by arguing that this revision has the potential to strengthen and enhance case study research in Comparative and International Education, clarifying the unique contributions of qualitative research.\n\n【摘要翻译】什么是案例研究，这有什么好处？在本文中，我们提出了一种新方法（比较案例研究方法），该方法同时参加了基于案例研究的宏，中索和微观维度。该方法与比较的两种逻辑有关：首先，更常见的比较和对比；其次，一个“跨越”站点或秤的“追踪”。当我们阐明方法时，我们也将其与传统案例研究进行对比。我们认为，社会科学的概念转变，特别是与文化，背景，空间，地点和比较本身有关的新方法。我们建议比较案例研究应参与三个轴：水平，垂直和横向比较。我们结论是，这项修订有可能加强和增强比较和国际教育中的案例研究，从而阐明定性研究的独特贡献。},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2023-04-26},\n\tjournal = {Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE)},\n\tauthor = {Bartlett, Lesley and Vavrus, Frances},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {Number: 1},\n\tkeywords = {/unread, case study, comparison, context, research methods},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bartlett, L.","Vavrus, F."],"key":"bartlett_comparative_2017","id":"bartlett_comparative_2017","bibbaseid":"bartlett-vavrus-comparativecasestudiesaninnovativeapproach-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/nordiccie/article/view/1929"},"keyword":["/unread","case study","comparison","context","research methods"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/_MingYAN_","dataSources":["7bvyz9GrWb3E3F8y3"],"keywords":["/unread","case study","comparison","context","research methods"],"search_terms":["comparative","case","studies","innovative","approach","bartlett","vavrus"],"title":"Comparative Case Studies: An Innovative Approach","year":2017}