@article{barugahare_bioethical_2019,
	title = {Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools},
	volume = {20},
	issn = {1472-6939},
	shorttitle = {Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7},
	doi = {10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7},
	abstract = {Despite existing international, regional and national guidance on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research, valid consent remains both a practical and normative challenge. This challenge persists despite additional evidence-based guidance obtained through conceptual and empirical research in specific localities on the same subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide an account for why, despite this guidance, this challenge still persist and suggest conceptual resources that can help make sense of this problem and eventually mitigate it’.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2019-07-09},
	journal = {BMC Medical Ethics},
	author = {Barugahare, John},
	month = jul,
	year = {2019},
	keywords = {Berman},
	pages = {44}
}

{"_id":"5wEqi6gRBEpwCbA4N","bibbaseid":"barugahare-bioethicalreflexivityandrequirementsofvalidconsentconceptualtools-2019","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Barugahare, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools","volume":"20","issn":"1472-6939","shorttitle":"Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent","url":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7","doi":"10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7","abstract":"Despite existing international, regional and national guidance on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research, valid consent remains both a practical and normative challenge. This challenge persists despite additional evidence-based guidance obtained through conceptual and empirical research in specific localities on the same subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide an account for why, despite this guidance, this challenge still persist and suggest conceptual resources that can help make sense of this problem and eventually mitigate it’.","number":"1","urldate":"2019-07-09","journal":"BMC Medical Ethics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Barugahare"],"firstnames":["John"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2019","keywords":"Berman","pages":"44","bibtex":"@article{barugahare_bioethical_2019,\n\ttitle = {Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools},\n\tvolume = {20},\n\tissn = {1472-6939},\n\tshorttitle = {Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7},\n\tdoi = {10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7},\n\tabstract = {Despite existing international, regional and national guidance on how to obtain valid consent to health-related research, valid consent remains both a practical and normative challenge. This challenge persists despite additional evidence-based guidance obtained through conceptual and empirical research in specific localities on the same subject. The purpose of this paper is to provide an account for why, despite this guidance, this challenge still persist and suggest conceptual resources that can help make sense of this problem and eventually mitigate it’.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2019-07-09},\n\tjournal = {BMC Medical Ethics},\n\tauthor = {Barugahare, John},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tkeywords = {Berman},\n\tpages = {44}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Barugahare, J."],"key":"barugahare_bioethical_2019","id":"barugahare_bioethical_2019","bibbaseid":"barugahare-bioethicalreflexivityandrequirementsofvalidconsentconceptualtools-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0385-7"},"keyword":["Berman"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2341479/items?key=y7vbq1WZ3A9zGUEweGXQXUvX&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2019-07-18T15:38:25.654Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["berman"],"search_terms":["bioethical","reflexivity","requirements","valid","consent","conceptual","tools","barugahare"],"title":"Bioethical reflexivity and requirements of valid consent: conceptual tools","year":2019,"dataSources":["YKXE62fKQu4jz6T33"]}