MSWEP: 3-Hourly 0.25° Global Gridded Precipitation (1979-2015) by Merging Gauge, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data. Beck, H. E., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., Levizzani, V., Schellekens, J., Miralles, D. G., Martens, B., & de Roo, A. Paper doi abstract bibtex Current global precipitation (P) datasets do not take full advantage of the complementary nature of satellite and reanalysis data. Here, we present Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP), a global P dataset for the period 1979-2015 with a 3-hourly temporal and 0.25° spatial resolution, specifically designed for hydrological modeling. The design philosophy of MSWEP was to optimally merge the highest quality P data sources available as a function of time scale and location. The long-term mean of MSWEP was based on the CHPclim dataset but replaced with more accurate regional datasets where available. A correction for gauge under-catch and orographic effects was introduced by inferring catchment-average P from streamflow (Q) observations at 13,762 stations across the globe. The temporal variability of MSWEP was determined by weighted averaging of P anomalies from seven datasets; two based solely on interpolation of gauge observations (CPC Unified and GPCC), three on satellite remote sensing (CMORPH, GSMaP-MVK, and TMPA 3B42RT), and two on atmospheric model reanalysis (ERA-Interim and JRA-55). For each grid cell, the weight assigned to the gauge-based estimates was calculated from the gauge network density, while the weights assigned to the satellite- and reanalysis-based estimates were calculated from their comparative performance at the surrounding gauges. The quality of MSWEP was compared against four state-of-the-art gauge-adjusted P datasets (WFDEI-CRU, GPCP-1DD, TMPA 3B42, and CPC Unified) using independent P data from 125 FLUXNET tower stations around the globe. MSWEP obtained the highest daily correlation coefficient (R) among the five P datasets for 60.0 % of the stations and a median R of 0.67 versus 0.44-0.59 for the other datasets. We further evaluated the performance of MSWEP using hydrological modeling for 9011 catchments ($<$ 50,000 km2) across the globe. Specifically, we calibrated the simple conceptual hydrological model HBV against daily Q observations with P from each of the different datasets. For the 1058 sparsely-gauged catchments, representative of 83.9 % of the global land surface (excluding Antarctica), MSWEP obtained a median calibration NSE of 0.52 versus 0.29-0.39 for the other P datasets. MSWEP is available via http://www.gloh2o.org.
@article{beckMSWEP3hourly252016,
title = {{{MSWEP}}: 3-Hourly 0.25° Global Gridded Precipitation (1979-2015) by Merging Gauge, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data},
author = {Beck, Hylke E. and van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. and Levizzani, Vincenzo and Schellekens, Jaap and Miralles, Diego G. and Martens, Brecht and de Roo, Ad},
date = {2016-05},
journaltitle = {Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions},
pages = {1--38},
issn = {1812-2116},
doi = {10.5194/hess-2016-236},
url = {http://mfkp.org/INRMM/article/14103191},
abstract = {Current global precipitation (P) datasets do not take full advantage of the complementary nature of satellite and reanalysis data. Here, we present Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP), a global P dataset for the period 1979-2015 with a 3-hourly temporal and 0.25° spatial resolution, specifically designed for hydrological modeling. The design philosophy of MSWEP was to optimally merge the highest quality P data sources available as a function of time scale and location. The long-term mean of MSWEP was based on the CHPclim dataset but replaced with more accurate regional datasets where available. A correction for gauge under-catch and orographic effects was introduced by inferring catchment-average P from streamflow (Q) observations at 13,762 stations across the globe. The temporal variability of MSWEP was determined by weighted averaging of P anomalies from seven datasets; two based solely on interpolation of gauge observations (CPC Unified and GPCC), three on satellite remote sensing (CMORPH, GSMaP-MVK, and TMPA 3B42RT), and two on atmospheric model reanalysis (ERA-Interim and JRA-55). For each grid cell, the weight assigned to the gauge-based estimates was calculated from the gauge network density, while the weights assigned to the satellite- and reanalysis-based estimates were calculated from their comparative performance at the surrounding gauges. The quality of MSWEP was compared against four state-of-the-art gauge-adjusted P datasets (WFDEI-CRU, GPCP-1DD, TMPA 3B42, and CPC Unified) using independent P data from 125 FLUXNET tower stations around the globe. MSWEP obtained the highest daily correlation coefficient (R) among the five P datasets for 60.0 \% of the stations and a median R of 0.67 versus 0.44-0.59 for the other datasets. We further evaluated the performance of MSWEP using hydrological modeling for 9011 catchments ({$<$} 50,000 km2) across the globe. Specifically, we calibrated the simple conceptual hydrological model HBV against daily Q observations with P from each of the different datasets. For the 1058 sparsely-gauged catchments, representative of 83.9 \% of the global land surface (excluding Antarctica), MSWEP obtained a median calibration NSE of 0.52 versus 0.29-0.39 for the other P datasets. MSWEP is available via http://www.gloh2o.org.},
keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-14103191,~to-add-doi-URL,bias-correction,environmental-modelling,featured-publication,global-scale,gridded-data,integration-techniques,open-data,precipitation,time-series},
options = {useprefix=true}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"A5WNjae4qnmHhsypu","bibbaseid":"beck-vandijk-levizzani-schellekens-miralles-martens-deroo-mswep3hourly025globalgriddedprecipitation19792015bymerginggaugesatelliteandreanalysisdata","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Beck, H. E.","van Dijk, A. I. J. M.","Levizzani, V.","Schellekens, J.","Miralles, D. G.","Martens, B.","de Roo, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"MSWEP: 3-Hourly 0.25° Global Gridded Precipitation (1979-2015) by Merging Gauge, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Beck"],"firstnames":["Hylke","E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van"],"lastnames":["Dijk"],"firstnames":["Albert","I.","J.","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Levizzani"],"firstnames":["Vincenzo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schellekens"],"firstnames":["Jaap"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Miralles"],"firstnames":["Diego","G."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Martens"],"firstnames":["Brecht"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["de"],"lastnames":["Roo"],"firstnames":["Ad"],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2016-05","journaltitle":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions","pages":"1–38","issn":"1812-2116","doi":"10.5194/hess-2016-236","url":"http://mfkp.org/INRMM/article/14103191","abstract":"Current global precipitation (P) datasets do not take full advantage of the complementary nature of satellite and reanalysis data. Here, we present Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP), a global P dataset for the period 1979-2015 with a 3-hourly temporal and 0.25° spatial resolution, specifically designed for hydrological modeling. The design philosophy of MSWEP was to optimally merge the highest quality P data sources available as a function of time scale and location. The long-term mean of MSWEP was based on the CHPclim dataset but replaced with more accurate regional datasets where available. A correction for gauge under-catch and orographic effects was introduced by inferring catchment-average P from streamflow (Q) observations at 13,762 stations across the globe. The temporal variability of MSWEP was determined by weighted averaging of P anomalies from seven datasets; two based solely on interpolation of gauge observations (CPC Unified and GPCC), three on satellite remote sensing (CMORPH, GSMaP-MVK, and TMPA 3B42RT), and two on atmospheric model reanalysis (ERA-Interim and JRA-55). For each grid cell, the weight assigned to the gauge-based estimates was calculated from the gauge network density, while the weights assigned to the satellite- and reanalysis-based estimates were calculated from their comparative performance at the surrounding gauges. The quality of MSWEP was compared against four state-of-the-art gauge-adjusted P datasets (WFDEI-CRU, GPCP-1DD, TMPA 3B42, and CPC Unified) using independent P data from 125 FLUXNET tower stations around the globe. MSWEP obtained the highest daily correlation coefficient (R) among the five P datasets for 60.0 % of the stations and a median R of 0.67 versus 0.44-0.59 for the other datasets. We further evaluated the performance of MSWEP using hydrological modeling for 9011 catchments ($<$ 50,000 km2) across the globe. Specifically, we calibrated the simple conceptual hydrological model HBV against daily Q observations with P from each of the different datasets. For the 1058 sparsely-gauged catchments, representative of 83.9 % of the global land surface (excluding Antarctica), MSWEP obtained a median calibration NSE of 0.52 versus 0.29-0.39 for the other P datasets. MSWEP is available via http://www.gloh2o.org.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-14103191,~to-add-doi-URL,bias-correction,environmental-modelling,featured-publication,global-scale,gridded-data,integration-techniques,open-data,precipitation,time-series","options":"useprefix=true","bibtex":"@article{beckMSWEP3hourly252016,\n title = {{{MSWEP}}: 3-Hourly 0.25° Global Gridded Precipitation (1979-2015) by Merging Gauge, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data},\n author = {Beck, Hylke E. and van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. and Levizzani, Vincenzo and Schellekens, Jaap and Miralles, Diego G. and Martens, Brecht and de Roo, Ad},\n date = {2016-05},\n journaltitle = {Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions},\n pages = {1--38},\n issn = {1812-2116},\n doi = {10.5194/hess-2016-236},\n url = {http://mfkp.org/INRMM/article/14103191},\n abstract = {Current global precipitation (P) datasets do not take full advantage of the complementary nature of satellite and reanalysis data. Here, we present Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP), a global P dataset for the period 1979-2015 with a 3-hourly temporal and 0.25° spatial resolution, specifically designed for hydrological modeling. The design philosophy of MSWEP was to optimally merge the highest quality P data sources available as a function of time scale and location. The long-term mean of MSWEP was based on the CHPclim dataset but replaced with more accurate regional datasets where available. A correction for gauge under-catch and orographic effects was introduced by inferring catchment-average P from streamflow (Q) observations at 13,762 stations across the globe. The temporal variability of MSWEP was determined by weighted averaging of P anomalies from seven datasets; two based solely on interpolation of gauge observations (CPC Unified and GPCC), three on satellite remote sensing (CMORPH, GSMaP-MVK, and TMPA 3B42RT), and two on atmospheric model reanalysis (ERA-Interim and JRA-55). For each grid cell, the weight assigned to the gauge-based estimates was calculated from the gauge network density, while the weights assigned to the satellite- and reanalysis-based estimates were calculated from their comparative performance at the surrounding gauges. The quality of MSWEP was compared against four state-of-the-art gauge-adjusted P datasets (WFDEI-CRU, GPCP-1DD, TMPA 3B42, and CPC Unified) using independent P data from 125 FLUXNET tower stations around the globe. MSWEP obtained the highest daily correlation coefficient (R) among the five P datasets for 60.0 \\% of the stations and a median R of 0.67 versus 0.44-0.59 for the other datasets. We further evaluated the performance of MSWEP using hydrological modeling for 9011 catchments ({$<$} 50,000 km2) across the globe. Specifically, we calibrated the simple conceptual hydrological model HBV against daily Q observations with P from each of the different datasets. For the 1058 sparsely-gauged catchments, representative of 83.9 \\% of the global land surface (excluding Antarctica), MSWEP obtained a median calibration NSE of 0.52 versus 0.29-0.39 for the other P datasets. MSWEP is available via http://www.gloh2o.org.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-14103191,~to-add-doi-URL,bias-correction,environmental-modelling,featured-publication,global-scale,gridded-data,integration-techniques,open-data,precipitation,time-series},\n options = {useprefix=true}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Beck, H. E.","van Dijk, A. I. J. M.","Levizzani, V.","Schellekens, J.","Miralles, D. G.","Martens, B.","de Roo, A."],"key":"beckMSWEP3hourly252016","id":"beckMSWEP3hourly252016","bibbaseid":"beck-vandijk-levizzani-schellekens-miralles-martens-deroo-mswep3hourly025globalgriddedprecipitation19792015bymerginggaugesatelliteandreanalysisdata","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://mfkp.org/INRMM/article/14103191"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-14103191","~to-add-doi-URL","bias-correction","environmental-modelling","featured-publication","global-scale","gridded-data","integration-techniques","open-data","precipitation","time-series"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:01.931Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-14103191","~to-add-doi-url","bias-correction","environmental-modelling","featured-publication","global-scale","gridded-data","integration-techniques","open-data","precipitation","time-series"],"search_terms":["mswep","hourly","global","gridded","precipitation","1979","2015","merging","gauge","satellite","reanalysis","data","beck","van dijk","levizzani","schellekens","miralles","martens","de roo"],"title":"MSWEP: 3-Hourly 0.25° Global Gridded Precipitation (1979-2015) by Merging Gauge, Satellite, and Reanalysis Data","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}