What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?. Belinkov, Y., Durrani, N., Dalvi, F., Sajjad, H., & Glass, J. In Barzilay, R. & Kan, M., editors, Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 861–872, Vancouver, Canada, July, 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics.
What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology? [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Neural machine translation (MT) models obtain state-of-the-art performance while maintaining a simple, end-to-end architecture. However, little is known about what these models learn about source and target languages during the training process. In this work, we analyze the representations learned by neural MT models at various levels of granularity and empirically evaluate the quality of the representations for learning morphology through extrinsic part-of-speech and morphological tagging tasks. We conduct a thorough investigation along several parameters: word-based vs. character-based representations, depth of the encoding layer, the identity of the target language, and encoder vs. decoder representations. Our data-driven, quantitative evaluation sheds light on important aspects in the neural MT system and its ability to capture word structure.
@inproceedings{belinkov_what_2017,
	address = {Vancouver, Canada},
	title = {What do {Neural} {Machine} {Translation} {Models} {Learn} about {Morphology}?},
	url = {https://aclanthology.org/P17-1080},
	doi = {10.18653/v1/P17-1080},
	abstract = {Neural machine translation (MT) models obtain state-of-the-art performance while maintaining a simple, end-to-end architecture. However, little is known about what these models learn about source and target languages during the training process. In this work, we analyze the representations learned by neural MT models at various levels of granularity and empirically evaluate the quality of the representations for learning morphology through extrinsic part-of-speech and morphological tagging tasks. We conduct a thorough investigation along several parameters: word-based vs. character-based representations, depth of the encoding layer, the identity of the target language, and encoder vs. decoder representations. Our data-driven, quantitative evaluation sheds light on important aspects in the neural MT system and its ability to capture word structure.},
	urldate = {2024-10-06},
	booktitle = {Proceedings of the 55th {Annual} {Meeting} of the {Association} for {Computational} {Linguistics} ({Volume} 1: {Long} {Papers})},
	publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
	author = {Belinkov, Yonatan and Durrani, Nadir and Dalvi, Fahim and Sajjad, Hassan and Glass, James},
	editor = {Barzilay, Regina and Kan, Min-Yen},
	month = jul,
	year = {2017},
	pages = {861--872},
}

Downloads: 0