{"_id":"2rCT8qtwoKnzevWiq","bibbaseid":"bergez-kuiper-thrond-taverne-belhouchette-wery-evaluatingintegratedassessmenttoolsforpolicysupport","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Bergez, J.","Kuiper, M.","Thérond, O.","Taverne, M.","Belhouchette, H.","Wery, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"Evaluating Integrated Assessment Tools for Policy Support","booktitle":"Environmental and Agricultural Modelling","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bergez"],"firstnames":["Jacques-Eric"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kuiper"],"firstnames":["Marijke"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Thérond"],"firstnames":["Olivier"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Taverne"],"firstnames":["Marie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Belhouchette"],"firstnames":["Hatem"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wery"],"firstnames":["Jacques"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brouwer"],"firstnames":["Floor","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ittersum"],"firstnames":["Martin","K."],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2010","pages":"237–256","publisher":"Springer Netherlands","doi":"10.1007/978-90-481-3619-3\\_10","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3619-3_10","abstract":"Integrated Assessment Modelling tools are complex tools requiring specific evaluation methodologies. Based on the example of the SEAMLESS-Integrated framework, we show how the conceptual, technical and system evaluation steps of the different components (procedures, quantitative models, graphic user interfaces) were performed by a multidisciplinary team. To make the not-yet-available tool real, mock-up and test cases were mobilized throughout the development process in order to integrate final end-users in the evaluation process. The main lessons from the project are that the evaluation required: (i) the use of prototypes to advance properly in the design and testing (spiral methodology); (ii) the use of case studies to stick to the end-users requirements; (iii) a proper timing of development and delivery in order to keep on schedule and leave time to the evaluation process; (iv) a multidisciplinary team of evaluators as tools are of diverse types; and (v) that it is difficult to keep independence between testers, end-users and modellers in order to guaranty transparency in the development and evaluation process.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13384223,assessment,integrated-modelling,science-policy-interface","bibtex":"@incollection{bergezEvaluatingIntegratedAssessment2010,\n title = {Evaluating Integrated Assessment Tools for Policy Support},\n booktitle = {Environmental and {{Agricultural Modelling}}},\n author = {Bergez, Jacques-Eric and Kuiper, Marijke and Thérond, Olivier and Taverne, Marie and Belhouchette, Hatem and Wery, Jacques},\n editor = {Brouwer, Floor M. and Ittersum, Martin K.},\n date = {2010},\n pages = {237--256},\n publisher = {{Springer Netherlands}},\n doi = {10.1007/978-90-481-3619-3\\\\_10},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3619-3_10},\n abstract = {Integrated Assessment Modelling tools are complex tools requiring specific evaluation methodologies. Based on the example of the SEAMLESS-Integrated framework, we show how the conceptual, technical and system evaluation steps of the different components (procedures, quantitative models, graphic user interfaces) were performed by a multidisciplinary team. To make the not-yet-available tool real, mock-up and test cases were mobilized throughout the development process in order to integrate final end-users in the evaluation process. The main lessons from the project are that the evaluation required: (i) the use of prototypes to advance properly in the design and testing (spiral methodology); (ii) the use of case studies to stick to the end-users requirements; (iii) a proper timing of development and delivery in order to keep on schedule and leave time to the evaluation process; (iv) a multidisciplinary team of evaluators as tools are of diverse types; and (v) that it is difficult to keep independence between testers, end-users and modellers in order to guaranty transparency in the development and evaluation process.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-13384223,assessment,integrated-modelling,science-policy-interface}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bergez, J.","Kuiper, M.","Thérond, O.","Taverne, M.","Belhouchette, H.","Wery, J."],"editor_short":["Brouwer, F. M.","Ittersum, M. K."],"key":"bergezEvaluatingIntegratedAssessment2010","id":"bergezEvaluatingIntegratedAssessment2010","bibbaseid":"bergez-kuiper-thrond-taverne-belhouchette-wery-evaluatingintegratedassessmenttoolsforpolicysupport","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3619-3_10"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-13384223","assessment","integrated-modelling","science-policy-interface"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:02.069Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-13384223","assessment","integrated-modelling","science-policy-interface"],"search_terms":["evaluating","integrated","assessment","tools","policy","support","bergez","kuiper","thérond","taverne","belhouchette","wery"],"title":"Evaluating Integrated Assessment Tools for Policy Support","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}