Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity. Bernecker, S. In Moyal-Sharrock, D, Munz, V, & Coliva, A, editors, Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium, pages 445–464. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2015. abstract bibtex [first paragraph] It has long been known that memory need not be a literal reproduction of the past but may be a constructive process. To say that memory is a constructive process is to say that the encoded content may differ from the retrieved content. At the same time, memory is bound by the authenticity constraint which states that the memory content must be true to the subject's original perception of reality. This paper addresses the question of how the constructive nature of visual memory can be reconciled with the authenticity constraint. In what re- spect and to what extent may the content of a visual memory differ from the original perceptual state while still adequately reflecting the subject's original perception?
@incollection{Bernecker2015b,
abstract = {[first paragraph] It has long been known that memory need not be a literal reproduction of the past but may be a constructive process. To say that memory is a constructive process is to say that the encoded content may differ from the retrieved content. At the same time, memory is bound by the authenticity constraint which states that the memory content must be true to the subject's original perception of reality. This paper addresses the question of how the constructive nature of visual memory can be reconciled with the authenticity constraint. In what re- spect and to what extent may the content of a visual memory differ from the original perceptual state while still adequately reflecting the subject's original perception?},
address = {Berlin},
author = {Bernecker, Sven},
booktitle = {Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium},
editor = {Moyal-Sharrock, D and Munz, V and Coliva, A},
file = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bernecker - 2015 - Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity.pdf:pdf},
pages = {445--464},
publisher = {De Gruyter},
title = {{Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity}},
year = {2015}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"SfoefAdzBEZe8bAMS","bibbaseid":"bernecker-visualmemoryandtheboundsofauthenticity-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-05T09:36:46.800Z","title":"Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity","author_short":["Bernecker, S."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"http://phil-mem.org/phil-mem.bib/","bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","abstract":"[first paragraph] It has long been known that memory need not be a literal reproduction of the past but may be a constructive process. To say that memory is a constructive process is to say that the encoded content may differ from the retrieved content. At the same time, memory is bound by the authenticity constraint which states that the memory content must be true to the subject's original perception of reality. This paper addresses the question of how the constructive nature of visual memory can be reconciled with the authenticity constraint. In what re- spect and to what extent may the content of a visual memory differ from the original perceptual state while still adequately reflecting the subject's original perception?","address":"Berlin","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bernecker"],"firstnames":["Sven"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium","editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moyal-Sharrock"],"firstnames":["D"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Munz"],"firstnames":["V"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Coliva"],"firstnames":["A"],"suffixes":[]}],"file":":Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bernecker - 2015 - Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity.pdf:pdf","pages":"445–464","publisher":"De Gruyter","title":"Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity","year":"2015","bibtex":"@incollection{Bernecker2015b,\nabstract = {[first paragraph] It has long been known that memory need not be a literal reproduction of the past but may be a constructive process. To say that memory is a constructive process is to say that the encoded content may differ from the retrieved content. At the same time, memory is bound by the authenticity constraint which states that the memory content must be true to the subject's original perception of reality. This paper addresses the question of how the constructive nature of visual memory can be reconciled with the authenticity constraint. In what re- spect and to what extent may the content of a visual memory differ from the original perceptual state while still adequately reflecting the subject's original perception?},\naddress = {Berlin},\nauthor = {Bernecker, Sven},\nbooktitle = {Mind, Language and Action: Proceedings of the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium},\neditor = {Moyal-Sharrock, D and Munz, V and Coliva, A},\nfile = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Bernecker - 2015 - Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity.pdf:pdf},\npages = {445--464},\npublisher = {De Gruyter},\ntitle = {{Visual memory and the bounds of authenticity}},\nyear = {2015}\n}\n","author_short":["Bernecker, S."],"editor_short":["Moyal-Sharrock, D","Munz, V","Coliva, A"],"key":"Bernecker2015b","id":"Bernecker2015b","bibbaseid":"bernecker-visualmemoryandtheboundsofauthenticity-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["visual","memory","bounds","authenticity","bernecker"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["xpm4HPGis5kQeHY7z"]}