@article{berry_personal_2013,
	title = {The {Personal} {Patient} {Profile}-{Prostate} decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial},
	volume = {31},
	issn = {1873-2496},
	shorttitle = {The {Personal} {Patient} {Profile}-{Prostate} decision support for men with localized prostate cancer},
	doi = {10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.004},
	abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to compare usual patient education plus the Internet-based Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, vs. usual education alone, on conflict associated with decision making, plus explore time-to-treatment, and treatment choice.
METHODS: A randomized, multi-center clinical trial was conducted with measures at baseline, 1-, and 6 months. Men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer (CaP) who sought consultation at urology, radiation oncology, or multi-disciplinary clinics in 4 geographically-distinct American cities were recruited. Intervention group participants used the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, a decision support system comprised of customized text and video coaching regarding potential outcomes, influential factors, and communication with care providers. The primary outcome, patient-reported decisional conflict, was evaluated over time using generalized estimating equations to fit generalized linear models. Additional outcomes, time-to-treatment, treatment choice, and program acceptability/usefulness, were explored.
RESULTS: A total of 494 eligible men were randomized (266 intervention; 228 control). The intervention reduced adjusted decisional conflict over time compared with the control group, for the uncertainty score (estimate -3.61; (confidence interval, -7.01, 0.22), and values clarity (estimate -3.57; confidence interval (-5.85,-1.30). Borderline effect was seen for the total decisional conflict score (estimate -1.75; confidence interval (-3.61,0.11). Time-to-treatment was comparable between groups, while undecided men in the intervention group chose brachytherapy more often than in the control group. Acceptability and usefulness were highly rated.
CONCLUSION: The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate is the first intervention to significantly reduce decisional conflict in a multi-center trial of American men with newly diagnosed localized CaP. Our findings support efficacy of P3P for addressing decision uncertainty and facilitating patient selection of a CaP treatment that is consistent with the patient values and preferences.},
	language = {eng},
	number = {7},
	journal = {Urologic Oncology},
	author = {Berry, Donna L. and Halpenny, Barbara and Hong, Fangxin and Wolpin, Seth and Lober, William B. and Russell, Kenneth J. and Ellis, William J. and Govindarajulu, Usha and Bosco, Jaclyn and Davison, B. Joyce and Bennett, Gerald and Terris, Martha K. and Barsevick, Andrea and Lin, Daniel W. and Yang, Claire C. and Swanson, Greg},
	month = oct,
	year = {2013},
	pmid = {22153756},
	pmcid = {PMC3349002},
	keywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Decision making, Decisional conflict, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Internet, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Randomized trial},
	pages = {1012--1021},
}

{"_id":"nd46kYnaNurFPCuMn","bibbaseid":"berry-halpenny-hong-wolpin-lober-russell-ellis-govindarajulu-etal-thepersonalpatientprofileprostatedecisionsupportformenwithlocalizedprostatecanceramulticenterrandomizedtrial-2013","authorIDs":["5ahvADmrSQM9hB6GR","5e4dad89e671efde010001ce","5e4db40be671efde0100022d","5e4eabb964b624de01000132","5e4edda92962cadf010000e2","5e4f175ee5389bde010000b2","5e545f4a88d190df010000e6","5e54633f88d190df01000124","5e549c01fd5b13df010000d6","5e5706247840dfde010004f9","d7LZpxC5icGW3ttya","iRWrzJeT8tq5xr3RE"],"author_short":["Berry, D. L.","Halpenny, B.","Hong, F.","Wolpin, S.","Lober, W. B.","Russell, K. J.","Ellis, W. J.","Govindarajulu, U.","Bosco, J.","Davison, B. J.","Bennett, G.","Terris, M. K.","Barsevick, A.","Lin, D. W.","Yang, C. C.","Swanson, G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial","volume":"31","issn":"1873-2496","shorttitle":"The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.004","abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to compare usual patient education plus the Internet-based Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, vs. usual education alone, on conflict associated with decision making, plus explore time-to-treatment, and treatment choice. METHODS: A randomized, multi-center clinical trial was conducted with measures at baseline, 1-, and 6 months. Men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer (CaP) who sought consultation at urology, radiation oncology, or multi-disciplinary clinics in 4 geographically-distinct American cities were recruited. Intervention group participants used the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, a decision support system comprised of customized text and video coaching regarding potential outcomes, influential factors, and communication with care providers. The primary outcome, patient-reported decisional conflict, was evaluated over time using generalized estimating equations to fit generalized linear models. Additional outcomes, time-to-treatment, treatment choice, and program acceptability/usefulness, were explored. RESULTS: A total of 494 eligible men were randomized (266 intervention; 228 control). The intervention reduced adjusted decisional conflict over time compared with the control group, for the uncertainty score (estimate -3.61; (confidence interval, -7.01, 0.22), and values clarity (estimate -3.57; confidence interval (-5.85,-1.30). Borderline effect was seen for the total decisional conflict score (estimate -1.75; confidence interval (-3.61,0.11). Time-to-treatment was comparable between groups, while undecided men in the intervention group chose brachytherapy more often than in the control group. Acceptability and usefulness were highly rated. CONCLUSION: The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate is the first intervention to significantly reduce decisional conflict in a multi-center trial of American men with newly diagnosed localized CaP. Our findings support efficacy of P3P for addressing decision uncertainty and facilitating patient selection of a CaP treatment that is consistent with the patient values and preferences.","language":"eng","number":"7","journal":"Urologic Oncology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Berry"],"firstnames":["Donna","L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Halpenny"],"firstnames":["Barbara"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hong"],"firstnames":["Fangxin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wolpin"],"firstnames":["Seth"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lober"],"firstnames":["William","B."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Russell"],"firstnames":["Kenneth","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ellis"],"firstnames":["William","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Govindarajulu"],"firstnames":["Usha"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bosco"],"firstnames":["Jaclyn"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Davison"],"firstnames":["B.","Joyce"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bennett"],"firstnames":["Gerald"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Terris"],"firstnames":["Martha","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Barsevick"],"firstnames":["Andrea"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lin"],"firstnames":["Daniel","W."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Yang"],"firstnames":["Claire","C."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Swanson"],"firstnames":["Greg"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2013","pmid":"22153756","pmcid":"PMC3349002","keywords":"Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Decision making, Decisional conflict, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Internet, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Randomized trial","pages":"1012–1021","bibtex":"@article{berry_personal_2013,\n\ttitle = {The {Personal} {Patient} {Profile}-{Prostate} decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial},\n\tvolume = {31},\n\tissn = {1873-2496},\n\tshorttitle = {The {Personal} {Patient} {Profile}-{Prostate} decision support for men with localized prostate cancer},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.10.004},\n\tabstract = {OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this trial was to compare usual patient education plus the Internet-based Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, vs. usual education alone, on conflict associated with decision making, plus explore time-to-treatment, and treatment choice.\nMETHODS: A randomized, multi-center clinical trial was conducted with measures at baseline, 1-, and 6 months. Men with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer (CaP) who sought consultation at urology, radiation oncology, or multi-disciplinary clinics in 4 geographically-distinct American cities were recruited. Intervention group participants used the Personal Patient Profile-Prostate, a decision support system comprised of customized text and video coaching regarding potential outcomes, influential factors, and communication with care providers. The primary outcome, patient-reported decisional conflict, was evaluated over time using generalized estimating equations to fit generalized linear models. Additional outcomes, time-to-treatment, treatment choice, and program acceptability/usefulness, were explored.\nRESULTS: A total of 494 eligible men were randomized (266 intervention; 228 control). The intervention reduced adjusted decisional conflict over time compared with the control group, for the uncertainty score (estimate -3.61; (confidence interval, -7.01, 0.22), and values clarity (estimate -3.57; confidence interval (-5.85,-1.30). Borderline effect was seen for the total decisional conflict score (estimate -1.75; confidence interval (-3.61,0.11). Time-to-treatment was comparable between groups, while undecided men in the intervention group chose brachytherapy more often than in the control group. Acceptability and usefulness were highly rated.\nCONCLUSION: The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate is the first intervention to significantly reduce decisional conflict in a multi-center trial of American men with newly diagnosed localized CaP. Our findings support efficacy of P3P for addressing decision uncertainty and facilitating patient selection of a CaP treatment that is consistent with the patient values and preferences.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {7},\n\tjournal = {Urologic Oncology},\n\tauthor = {Berry, Donna L. and Halpenny, Barbara and Hong, Fangxin and Wolpin, Seth and Lober, William B. and Russell, Kenneth J. and Ellis, William J. and Govindarajulu, Usha and Bosco, Jaclyn and Davison, B. Joyce and Bennett, Gerald and Terris, Martha K. and Barsevick, Andrea and Lin, Daniel W. and Yang, Claire C. and Swanson, Greg},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpmid = {22153756},\n\tpmcid = {PMC3349002},\n\tkeywords = {Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Choice Behavior, Decision Making, Decision making, Decisional conflict, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Internet, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies, Prostate cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms, Randomized trial},\n\tpages = {1012--1021},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Berry, D. L.","Halpenny, B.","Hong, F.","Wolpin, S.","Lober, W. B.","Russell, K. J.","Ellis, W. J.","Govindarajulu, U.","Bosco, J.","Davison, B. J.","Bennett, G.","Terris, M. K.","Barsevick, A.","Lin, D. W.","Yang, C. C.","Swanson, G."],"key":"berry_personal_2013","id":"berry_personal_2013","bibbaseid":"berry-halpenny-hong-wolpin-lober-russell-ellis-govindarajulu-etal-thepersonalpatientprofileprostatedecisionsupportformenwithlocalizedprostatecanceramulticenterrandomizedtrial-2013","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adult","Aged","Aged","80 and over","Choice Behavior","Decision Making","Decision making","Decisional conflict","Health Knowledge","Attitudes","Practice","Humans","Internet","Linear Models","Male","Middle Aged","Outcome Assessment","Health Care","Patient Education as Topic","Prospective Studies","Prostate cancer","Prostatic Neoplasms","Randomized trial"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"lober, w":"https://www.cirg.washington.edu/pubs/clinical-info-publications.html"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2451541/items?key=ETxlqY6gstXyHoIDbJCT8yVh&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2020-01-21T00:59:23.467Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["adult","aged","aged","80 and over","choice behavior","decision making","decision making","decisional conflict","health knowledge","attitudes","practice","humans","internet","linear models","male","middle aged","outcome assessment","health care","patient education as topic","prospective studies","prostate cancer","prostatic neoplasms","randomized trial"],"search_terms":["personal","patient","profile","prostate","decision","support","men","localized","prostate","cancer","multi","center","randomized","trial","berry","halpenny","hong","wolpin","lober","russell","ellis","govindarajulu","bosco","davison","bennett","terris","barsevick","lin","yang","swanson"],"title":"The Personal Patient Profile-Prostate decision support for men with localized prostate cancer: a multi-center randomized trial","year":2013,"dataSources":["K7F7TwXAn7H3rFsQm","oyZZRPQiHJgh2bdsq"]}