Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females. Bhattarai, A. & Staat, M. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, 4(1):661-664, 9, 2018. ![Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website doi abstract bibtex Prosthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh® PRS soft, DynaMesh® PRP soft and DynaMesh® CESA from FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Germany are compared.
@article{
title = {Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females},
type = {article},
year = {2018},
pages = {661-664},
volume = {4},
websites = {http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cdbme.2018.4.issue-1/cdbme-2018-0159/cdbme-2018-0159.xml},
month = {9},
day = {1},
id = {15f6a0d3-fb56-3c7c-acbb-2cb9cbe319f6},
created = {2018-09-22T14:15:53.817Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6},
last_modified = {2018-12-11T22:02:04.233Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {true},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Bhattarai2018d},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Prosthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh® PRS soft, DynaMesh® PRP soft and DynaMesh® CESA from FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Germany are compared.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Bhattarai, Aroj and Staat, Manfred},
doi = {10.1515/cdbme-2018-0159},
journal = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},
number = {1}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"X9gHm4cNeQQehMfhx","bibbaseid":"bhattarai-staat-computationalcomparisonofdifferenttextileimplantstocorrectapicalprolapseinfemales-2018","authorIDs":["5dba9b3cdd3901df010000ff","5dbc2e733d8602de01000053","7jhRHDZJ6AgPa9GzF","jhiQiuMkuDQBRuuJ8"],"author_short":["Bhattarai, A.","Staat, M."],"bibdata":{"title":"Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females","type":"article","year":"2018","pages":"661-664","volume":"4","websites":"http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cdbme.2018.4.issue-1/cdbme-2018-0159/cdbme-2018-0159.xml","month":"9","day":"1","id":"15f6a0d3-fb56-3c7c-acbb-2cb9cbe319f6","created":"2018-09-22T14:15:53.817Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","last_modified":"2018-12-11T22:02:04.233Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Bhattarai2018d","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Prosthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh® PRS soft, DynaMesh® PRP soft and DynaMesh® CESA from FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Germany are compared.","bibtype":"article","author":"Bhattarai, Aroj and Staat, Manfred","doi":"10.1515/cdbme-2018-0159","journal":"Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering","number":"1","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n pages = {661-664},\n volume = {4},\n websites = {http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cdbme.2018.4.issue-1/cdbme-2018-0159/cdbme-2018-0159.xml},\n month = {9},\n day = {1},\n id = {15f6a0d3-fb56-3c7c-acbb-2cb9cbe319f6},\n created = {2018-09-22T14:15:53.817Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6},\n last_modified = {2018-12-11T22:02:04.233Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Bhattarai2018d},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Prosthetic textile implants of different shapes, sizes and polymers are used to correct the apical prolapse after hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The selection of the implant before or during minimally invasive surgery depends on the patient’s anatomical defect, intended function after reconstruction and most importantly the surgeon’s preference. Weakness or damage of the supporting tissues during childbirth, menopause or previous pelvic surgeries may put females in higher risk of prolapse. Numerical simulations of reconstructed pelvic floor with weakened tissues and organ supported by textile product models: DynaMesh® PRS soft, DynaMesh® PRP soft and DynaMesh® CESA from FEG Textiltechnik mbH, Germany are compared.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Bhattarai, Aroj and Staat, Manfred},\n doi = {10.1515/cdbme-2018-0159},\n journal = {Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering},\n number = {1}\n}","author_short":["Bhattarai, A.","Staat, M."],"urls":{"Website":"http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cdbme.2018.4.issue-1/cdbme-2018-0159/cdbme-2018-0159.xml"},"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","bibbaseid":"bhattarai-staat-computationalcomparisonofdifferenttextileimplantstocorrectapicalprolapseinfemales-2018","role":"author","metadata":{"authorlinks":{"staat, m":"https://bibbase.org/show?bib=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zotero.org%2Fusers%2F6114608%2Fcollections%2FTJTBXR6Y%2Fitems%3Fkey%3DqbBfhA5sX7Oco1IT48KAsV2v%26format%3Dbibtex%26limit%3D100&msg=embed","staat, m":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2019-10-31T08:28:44.305Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["computational","comparison","different","textile","implants","correct","apical","prolapse","females","bhattarai","staat"],"title":"Computational comparison of different textile implants to correct apical prolapse in females","year":2018,"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/93ec0d5b-403c-3f87-b702-40b6362f05e6","dataSources":["dAp5WYHoS5SWSKWoa","i5FJs3p7i69258A5p","6oZq3hyFvk3yWvfWa"]}