State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science. Biddle, J. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1):124–133, March, 2013. 1![State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex This paper examines the state of the field of “science and values”—particularly regarding the implications of the thesis of transient underdetermination for the ideal of value-free science, or what I call the “ideal of epistemic purity.” I do this by discussing some of the main arguments in the literature, both for and against the ideal. I examine a preliminary argument from transient underdetermination against the ideal of epistemic purity, and I discuss two different formulations of an objection to this argument—an objection that requires the strict separation of the epistemic from the practical. A secondary aim of the paper is to suggest some future directions for the field, one of which is to replace the vocabulary of values that is often employed in the literature with a more precise one.
@article{biddle_state_2013,
title = {State of the field: {Transient} underdetermination and values in science},
volume = {44},
issn = {0039-3681},
shorttitle = {State of the field},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936811200074X},
doi = {10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003},
abstract = {This paper examines the state of the field of “science and values”—particularly regarding the implications of the thesis of transient underdetermination for the ideal of value-free science, or what I call the “ideal of epistemic purity.” I do this by discussing some of the main arguments in the literature, both for and against the ideal. I examine a preliminary argument from transient underdetermination against the ideal of epistemic purity, and I discuss two different formulations of an objection to this argument—an objection that requires the strict separation of the epistemic from the practical. A secondary aim of the paper is to suggest some future directions for the field, one of which is to replace the vocabulary of values that is often employed in the literature with a more precise one.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2018-09-21},
journal = {Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A},
author = {Biddle, Justin},
month = mar,
year = {2013},
note = {1},
keywords = {Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Science and values, Transient underdetermination},
pages = {124--133},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"rqXsbpZCekMvCEGRd","bibbaseid":"biddle-stateofthefieldtransientunderdeterminationandvaluesinscience-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-11-20T11:42:57.003Z","title":"State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science","author_short":["Biddle, J."],"year":2013,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science","volume":"44","issn":"0039-3681","shorttitle":"State of the field","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936811200074X","doi":"10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003","abstract":"This paper examines the state of the field of “science and values”—particularly regarding the implications of the thesis of transient underdetermination for the ideal of value-free science, or what I call the “ideal of epistemic purity.” I do this by discussing some of the main arguments in the literature, both for and against the ideal. I examine a preliminary argument from transient underdetermination against the ideal of epistemic purity, and I discuss two different formulations of an objection to this argument—an objection that requires the strict separation of the epistemic from the practical. A secondary aim of the paper is to suggest some future directions for the field, one of which is to replace the vocabulary of values that is often employed in the literature with a more precise one.","number":"1","urldate":"2018-09-21","journal":"Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Biddle"],"firstnames":["Justin"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2013","note":"1","keywords":"Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Science and values, Transient underdetermination","pages":"124–133","bibtex":"@article{biddle_state_2013,\n\ttitle = {State of the field: {Transient} underdetermination and values in science},\n\tvolume = {44},\n\tissn = {0039-3681},\n\tshorttitle = {State of the field},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936811200074X},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003},\n\tabstract = {This paper examines the state of the field of “science and values”—particularly regarding the implications of the thesis of transient underdetermination for the ideal of value-free science, or what I call the “ideal of epistemic purity.” I do this by discussing some of the main arguments in the literature, both for and against the ideal. I examine a preliminary argument from transient underdetermination against the ideal of epistemic purity, and I discuss two different formulations of an objection to this argument—an objection that requires the strict separation of the epistemic from the practical. A secondary aim of the paper is to suggest some future directions for the field, one of which is to replace the vocabulary of values that is often employed in the literature with a more precise one.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2018-09-21},\n\tjournal = {Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A},\n\tauthor = {Biddle, Justin},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {1},\n\tkeywords = {Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Science and values, Transient underdetermination},\n\tpages = {124--133},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Biddle, J."],"key":"biddle_state_2013","id":"biddle_state_2013","bibbaseid":"biddle-stateofthefieldtransientunderdeterminationandvaluesinscience-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003936811200074X"},"keyword":["Ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information","PRINTED (Fonds papier)","Science and values","Transient underdetermination"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["state","field","transient","underdetermination","values","science","biddle"],"keywords":["ignorance in history and philosophy of science and technology - general information","printed (fonds papier)","science and values","transient underdetermination"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}