@article{bjorkman_go_2016,
	title = {Go get, come see: {Motion} verbs, morphological restrictions, and syncretism},
	volume = {34},
	issn = {0167-806X},
	shorttitle = {Go get, come see},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/43698467},
	abstract = {This paper addresses the interaction between morphology and syntax in cases where the morphological realization of a structure appears to determine its grammaticality. The empirical focus of the discussion is the go get construction (Zwicky 1969; et seq.), a construction which in English is subject to a strict morphological restriction, only being possible with "bare" morphology. It is proposed that this kind of surface-oriented restriction can be accounted for within the morphological component on the assumption that the syntax can place multiple sets of features on a verb: these multiple feature sets will be interpretable within the morphology only when all sets of features converge on a single realization. The analysis developed for English is then generalized to analogues of the go get construction in languages that show morphological restrictions different from the one seen in English: Marsalese (Cardinaletti and Giusti 2001), Modern Greek, and Modern Hebrew, and an outline is given for its extension to other phenomena in which morphological syncretism is able to resolve cases of syntactic feature conflicts.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2020-07-13},
	journal = {Natural Language \& Linguistic Theory},
	author = {Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.},
	year = {2016},
	pages = {53--91},
}

{"_id":"u3exiuG8mGYMSxzzx","bibbaseid":"bjorkman-gogetcomeseemotionverbsmorphologicalrestrictionsandsyncretism-2016","author_short":["Bjorkman, B. M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Go get, come see: Motion verbs, morphological restrictions, and syncretism","volume":"34","issn":"0167-806X","shorttitle":"Go get, come see","url":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/43698467","abstract":"This paper addresses the interaction between morphology and syntax in cases where the morphological realization of a structure appears to determine its grammaticality. The empirical focus of the discussion is the go get construction (Zwicky 1969; et seq.), a construction which in English is subject to a strict morphological restriction, only being possible with \"bare\" morphology. It is proposed that this kind of surface-oriented restriction can be accounted for within the morphological component on the assumption that the syntax can place multiple sets of features on a verb: these multiple feature sets will be interpretable within the morphology only when all sets of features converge on a single realization. The analysis developed for English is then generalized to analogues of the go get construction in languages that show morphological restrictions different from the one seen in English: Marsalese (Cardinaletti and Giusti 2001), Modern Greek, and Modern Hebrew, and an outline is given for its extension to other phenomena in which morphological syncretism is able to resolve cases of syntactic feature conflicts.","number":"1","urldate":"2020-07-13","journal":"Natural Language & Linguistic Theory","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bjorkman"],"firstnames":["Bronwyn","M."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","pages":"53–91","bibtex":"@article{bjorkman_go_2016,\n\ttitle = {Go get, come see: {Motion} verbs, morphological restrictions, and syncretism},\n\tvolume = {34},\n\tissn = {0167-806X},\n\tshorttitle = {Go get, come see},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/43698467},\n\tabstract = {This paper addresses the interaction between morphology and syntax in cases where the morphological realization of a structure appears to determine its grammaticality. The empirical focus of the discussion is the go get construction (Zwicky 1969; et seq.), a construction which in English is subject to a strict morphological restriction, only being possible with \"bare\" morphology. It is proposed that this kind of surface-oriented restriction can be accounted for within the morphological component on the assumption that the syntax can place multiple sets of features on a verb: these multiple feature sets will be interpretable within the morphology only when all sets of features converge on a single realization. The analysis developed for English is then generalized to analogues of the go get construction in languages that show morphological restrictions different from the one seen in English: Marsalese (Cardinaletti and Giusti 2001), Modern Greek, and Modern Hebrew, and an outline is given for its extension to other phenomena in which morphological syncretism is able to resolve cases of syntactic feature conflicts.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-07-13},\n\tjournal = {Natural Language \\& Linguistic Theory},\n\tauthor = {Bjorkman, Bronwyn M.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {53--91},\n}\n","author_short":["Bjorkman, B. M."],"key":"bjorkman_go_2016","id":"bjorkman_go_2016","bibbaseid":"bjorkman-gogetcomeseemotionverbsmorphologicalrestrictionsandsyncretism-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/43698467"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":1},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/4976940/collections/D2ZXXPA4/items?format=bibtex","dataSources":["GggDuaKKHTncwJ2kK","mondossz9avfeh3P6"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["come","see","motion","verbs","morphological","restrictions","syncretism","bjorkman"],"title":"Go get, come see: Motion verbs, morphological restrictions, and syncretism","year":2016,"downloads":1}