The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 28(6):489–498, 2015. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jts.22059
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a widely used DSM-correspondent self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. The PCL was recently revised to reflect DSM-5 changes to the PTSD criteria. In this article, the authors describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of the PCL for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Psychometric properties of the PCL-5 were examined in 2 studies involving trauma-exposed college students. In Study 1 (N = 278), PCL-5 scores exhibited strong internal consistency (α = .94), test-retest reliability (r = .82), and convergent (rs = .74 to .85) and discriminant (rs = .31 to .60) validity. In addition, confirmatory factor analyses indicated adequate fit with the DSM-5 4-factor model, χ2(164) = 455.83, p \textless .001, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .07, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = .08, comparative fit index (CFI) = .86, and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .84, and superior fit with recently proposed 6-factor, χ2 (164) = 318.37, p \textless .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .92, and TLI = .90, and 7-factor, χ2 (164) = 291.32, p \textless .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .93, and TLI = .91, models. In Study 2 (N = 558), PCL-5 scores demonstrated similarly strong reliability and validity. Overall, results indicate that the PCL-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of PTSD symptoms. Implications for use of the PCL-5 in a variety of assessment contexts are discussed.
@article{blevins_posttraumatic_2015,
	title = {The {Posttraumatic} {Stress} {Disorder} {Checklist} for {DSM}-5 ({PCL}-5): {Development} and {Initial} {Psychometric} {Evaluation}},
	volume = {28},
	copyright = {Copyright © 2015 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies},
	issn = {1573-6598},
	shorttitle = {The {Posttraumatic} {Stress} {Disorder} {Checklist} for {DSM}-5 ({PCL}-5)},
	url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jts.22059},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22059},
	abstract = {The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a widely used DSM-correspondent self-report measure of PTSD symptoms. The PCL was recently revised to reflect DSM-5 changes to the PTSD criteria. In this article, the authors describe the development and initial psychometric evaluation of the PCL for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Psychometric properties of the PCL-5 were examined in 2 studies involving trauma-exposed college students. In Study 1 (N = 278), PCL-5 scores exhibited strong internal consistency (α = .94), test-retest reliability (r = .82), and convergent (rs = .74 to .85) and discriminant (rs = .31 to .60) validity. In addition, confirmatory factor analyses indicated adequate fit with the DSM-5 4-factor model, χ2(164) = 455.83, p {\textless} .001, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = .07, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = .08, comparative fit index (CFI) = .86, and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = .84, and superior fit with recently proposed 6-factor, χ2 (164) = 318.37, p {\textless} .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .92, and TLI = .90, and 7-factor, χ2 (164) = 291.32, p {\textless} .001, SRMR = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .93, and TLI = .91, models. In Study 2 (N = 558), PCL-5 scores demonstrated similarly strong reliability and validity. Overall, results indicate that the PCL-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of PTSD symptoms. Implications for use of the PCL-5 in a variety of assessment contexts are discussed.},
	language = {en},
	number = {6},
	urldate = {2021-02-19},
	journal = {Journal of Traumatic Stress},
	author = {Blevins, Christy A. and Weathers, Frank W. and Davis, Margaret T. and Witte, Tracy K. and Domino, Jessica L.},
	year = {2015},
	note = {\_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jts.22059},
	pages = {489--498},
}

Downloads: 0