Experiments in Public Management Research. Blom-Hansen, J., Morton, R., & Serritzlew, S. International Public Management Journal, 18(2):151–170, April, 2015.
Experiments in Public Management Research [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
This article argues that experimental methods are underused in public management research. This is lamentable, since this research field faces especially severe endogeneity problems. We introduce five different experimental designs together with a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses in public management research: lab, survey, field, natural, and quasi-experiments. We also discuss whether experiments are low on external validity. This objection is often raised, but we think it is false.
@article{blom-hansen_experiments_2015,
	title = {Experiments in {Public} {Management} {Research}},
	volume = {18},
	issn = {1096-7494, 1559-3169},
	url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10967494.2015.1024904},
	doi = {10.1080/10967494.2015.1024904},
	abstract = {This article argues that experimental methods are underused in public management research. This is lamentable, since this research field faces especially severe endogeneity problems. We introduce five different experimental designs together with a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses in public management research: lab, survey, field, natural, and quasi-experiments. We also discuss whether experiments are low on external validity. This objection is often raised, but we think it is false.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2018-06-12},
	journal = {International Public Management Journal},
	author = {Blom-Hansen, Jens and Morton, Rebecca and Serritzlew, Søren},
	month = apr,
	year = {2015},
	pages = {151--170}
}

Downloads: 0