@ARTICLE{Bock1989,
  author = {K Bock},
  title = {Closed-class immanence in sentence production.},
  journal = {Cognition},
  year = {1989},
  volume = {31},
  pages = {163-86},
  number = {2},
  abstract = {The closed-class hypothesis asserts that function words play a privileged
	role in syntactic processes. In language production, the claim is
	that such words are intrinsic to, identified with, or immanent in
	phrasal skeletons. Two experiments tested this hypothesis with a
	syntactic priming procedure. In both, subjects tended to produce
	utterances in the same syntactic forms as priming sentences, with
	the structures of the self-generated sentences varying as a function
	of differences in the structures of the primes. Changes in the closed-class
	elements of the priming sentences had no effect on this tendency
	over and above the impact of the structural changes. These results
	suggest that free-standing closed-class morphemes are not inherent
	components of the structural frames of English sentences.},
  keywords = {Cues, Human, Linguistics, Models, Psychological, Phonetics, Support,
	U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Vocabulary, 2721134}
}

{"_id":"Ayi6HzM5vcKpefMQK","bibbaseid":"bock-closedclassimmanenceinsentenceproduction-1989","author_short":["Bock, K"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["K"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bock"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Closed-class immanence in sentence production.","journal":"Cognition","year":"1989","volume":"31","pages":"163-86","number":"2","abstract":"The closed-class hypothesis asserts that function words play a privileged role in syntactic processes. In language production, the claim is that such words are intrinsic to, identified with, or immanent in phrasal skeletons. Two experiments tested this hypothesis with a syntactic priming procedure. In both, subjects tended to produce utterances in the same syntactic forms as priming sentences, with the structures of the self-generated sentences varying as a function of differences in the structures of the primes. Changes in the closed-class elements of the priming sentences had no effect on this tendency over and above the impact of the structural changes. These results suggest that free-standing closed-class morphemes are not inherent components of the structural frames of English sentences.","keywords":"Cues, Human, Linguistics, Models, Psychological, Phonetics, Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Vocabulary, 2721134","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Bock1989,\n author = {K Bock},\n title = {Closed-class immanence in sentence production.},\n journal = {Cognition},\n year = {1989},\n volume = {31},\n pages = {163-86},\n number = {2},\n abstract = {The closed-class hypothesis asserts that function words play a privileged\n\trole in syntactic processes. In language production, the claim is\n\tthat such words are intrinsic to, identified with, or immanent in\n\tphrasal skeletons. Two experiments tested this hypothesis with a\n\tsyntactic priming procedure. In both, subjects tended to produce\n\tutterances in the same syntactic forms as priming sentences, with\n\tthe structures of the self-generated sentences varying as a function\n\tof differences in the structures of the primes. Changes in the closed-class\n\telements of the priming sentences had no effect on this tendency\n\tover and above the impact of the structural changes. These results\n\tsuggest that free-standing closed-class morphemes are not inherent\n\tcomponents of the structural frames of English sentences.},\n keywords = {Cues, Human, Linguistics, Models, Psychological, Phonetics, Support,\n\tU.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Vocabulary, 2721134}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bock, K"],"key":"Bock1989","id":"Bock1989","bibbaseid":"bock-closedclassimmanenceinsentenceproduction-1989","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Cues","Human","Linguistics","Models","Psychological","Phonetics","Support","U.S. Gov't","Non-P.H.S.","Vocabulary","2721134"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["cues","human","linguistics","models","psychological","phonetics","support","u.s. gov't","non-p.h.s.","vocabulary","2721134"],"search_terms":["closed","class","immanence","sentence","production","bock"],"title":"Closed-class immanence in sentence production.","year":1989}