Decision-making under the condition of uncertainty and non-knowledge. Bogner, A. In Gross, M. & McGoey, L., editors, Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, pages 17–25. Routledge, May, 2015. abstract bibtex This chapter shows, with a view to prenatal diagnosis, that providing scientific information and science-based diagnostics not only results in more rational decisions and a better care, but results in clear-cut boundaries between sick and healthy become blurred, leading to new uncertainties. In order to reflexively deal with non-knowledge and uncertainty, the knowledge and the experiences of the women affected supplement expert knowledge. Decision-making turns out to be a deliberative process, where the voice and the values of patients tend to gain a constitutive role. With respect to the debate on non-knowledge, prenatal diagnosis has some implications to be further reflected upon. It shows that assigning a more active role to patients in decision-making may be a way of constructively dealing with uncertainty and non-knowledge. Many issues regarding innovation, technology and the environment are associated with uncertainty, non-knowledge and long-lasting disagreement.
@incollection{gross_decision-making_2015,
title = {Decision-making under the condition of uncertainty and non-knowledge},
isbn = {978-1-315-86776-2},
abstract = {This chapter shows, with a view to prenatal diagnosis, that providing scientific information and science-based diagnostics not only results in more rational decisions and a better care, but results in clear-cut boundaries between sick and healthy become blurred, leading to new uncertainties. In order to reflexively deal with non-knowledge and uncertainty, the knowledge and the experiences of the women affected supplement expert knowledge. Decision-making turns out to be a deliberative process, where the voice and the values of patients tend to gain a constitutive role. With respect to the debate on non-knowledge, prenatal diagnosis has some implications to be further reflected upon. It shows that assigning a more active role to patients in decision-making may be a way of constructively dealing with uncertainty and non-knowledge. Many issues regarding innovation, technology and the environment are associated with uncertainty, non-knowledge and long-lasting disagreement.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2021-03-04},
booktitle = {Routledge {International} {Handbook} of {Ignorance} {Studies}},
publisher = {Routledge},
author = {Bogner, Alexander},
editor = {Gross, Matthias and McGoey, Linsey},
month = may,
year = {2015},
keywords = {10 Ignorance, uncertainty and risk, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},
pages = {17--25},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"rzKw5F5TGRTrxSx7o","bibbaseid":"bogner-decisionmakingundertheconditionofuncertaintyandnonknowledge-2015","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Bogner, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"Decision-making under the condition of uncertainty and non-knowledge","isbn":"978-1-315-86776-2","abstract":"This chapter shows, with a view to prenatal diagnosis, that providing scientific information and science-based diagnostics not only results in more rational decisions and a better care, but results in clear-cut boundaries between sick and healthy become blurred, leading to new uncertainties. In order to reflexively deal with non-knowledge and uncertainty, the knowledge and the experiences of the women affected supplement expert knowledge. Decision-making turns out to be a deliberative process, where the voice and the values of patients tend to gain a constitutive role. With respect to the debate on non-knowledge, prenatal diagnosis has some implications to be further reflected upon. It shows that assigning a more active role to patients in decision-making may be a way of constructively dealing with uncertainty and non-knowledge. Many issues regarding innovation, technology and the environment are associated with uncertainty, non-knowledge and long-lasting disagreement.","language":"en","urldate":"2021-03-04","booktitle":"Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies","publisher":"Routledge","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bogner"],"firstnames":["Alexander"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gross"],"firstnames":["Matthias"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["McGoey"],"firstnames":["Linsey"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2015","keywords":"10 Ignorance, uncertainty and risk, PRINTED (Fonds papier)","pages":"17–25","bibtex":"@incollection{gross_decision-making_2015,\n\ttitle = {Decision-making under the condition of uncertainty and non-knowledge},\n\tisbn = {978-1-315-86776-2},\n\tabstract = {This chapter shows, with a view to prenatal diagnosis, that providing scientific information and science-based diagnostics not only results in more rational decisions and a better care, but results in clear-cut boundaries between sick and healthy become blurred, leading to new uncertainties. In order to reflexively deal with non-knowledge and uncertainty, the knowledge and the experiences of the women affected supplement expert knowledge. Decision-making turns out to be a deliberative process, where the voice and the values of patients tend to gain a constitutive role. With respect to the debate on non-knowledge, prenatal diagnosis has some implications to be further reflected upon. It shows that assigning a more active role to patients in decision-making may be a way of constructively dealing with uncertainty and non-knowledge. Many issues regarding innovation, technology and the environment are associated with uncertainty, non-knowledge and long-lasting disagreement.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-03-04},\n\tbooktitle = {Routledge {International} {Handbook} of {Ignorance} {Studies}},\n\tpublisher = {Routledge},\n\tauthor = {Bogner, Alexander},\n\teditor = {Gross, Matthias and McGoey, Linsey},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {10 Ignorance, uncertainty and risk, PRINTED (Fonds papier)},\n\tpages = {17--25},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bogner, A."],"editor_short":["Gross, M.","McGoey, L."],"key":"gross_decision-making_2015","id":"gross_decision-making_2015","bibbaseid":"bogner-decisionmakingundertheconditionofuncertaintyandnonknowledge-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["10 Ignorance","uncertainty and risk","PRINTED (Fonds papier)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","creationDate":"2021-03-06T20:01:49.634Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["10 ignorance","uncertainty and risk","printed (fonds papier)"],"search_terms":["decision","making","under","condition","uncertainty","non","knowledge","bogner"],"title":"Decision-making under the condition of uncertainty and non-knowledge","year":2015,"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}