Studio teaching in the low-precedent context of instructional design. Boling, E., Gray, C. M, & Smith, K. M In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers, pages 1417–1431, Chicago, IL, 2015. School of the Art Institute of Chicago. abstract bibtex Instructional design (ID) has been a scientized field of design for half a century, which means that models and principles have been emphasized in ID education over other forms of design knowledge, including precedent. In the study of design broadly defined, precedent is well established as a form of knowledge essential to competent practice. It is plentiful and made available through multiple channels, by practitioners as well as educators. This 7-year study examines the challenges for students in learning to recognize, appreciate and use precedent in designing images to support learning. These include the need to develop analogical thinking related to the use of precedent in their own work, to recognize precedents they already use without explicit awareness, to attend to precedent and seek it independent of its immediate use. Methods used in the studio course under study are discussed, together with examples of students' design activities at each stage in the evolution of the course. Data for this study comprise detailed field notes from each class period, student work, and reflections assigned as part of the regular class assignments.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Boling2015-vg,
title = "Studio teaching in the low-precedent context of instructional
design",
author = "Boling, Elizabeth and Gray, Colin M and Smith, Kennon M",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design
Education Researchers",
publisher = "School of the Art Institute of Chicago",
address = "Chicago, IL",
pages = "1417--1431",
abstract = "Instructional design (ID) has been a scientized field of design
for half a century, which means that models and principles have
been emphasized in ID education over other forms of design
knowledge, including precedent. In the study of design broadly
defined, precedent is well established as a form of knowledge
essential to competent practice. It is plentiful and made
available through multiple channels, by practitioners as well as
educators. This 7-year study examines the challenges for students
in learning to recognize, appreciate and use precedent in
designing images to support learning. These include the need to
develop analogical thinking related to the use of precedent in
their own work, to recognize precedents they already use without
explicit awareness, to attend to precedent and seek it
independent of its immediate use. Methods used in the studio
course under study are discussed, together with examples of
students' design activities at each stage in the evolution of the
course. Data for this study comprise detailed field notes from
each class period, student work, and reflections assigned as part
of the regular class assignments.",
year = 2015
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"xoRvzkmxCYZw7AYMJ","bibbaseid":"boling-gray-smith-studioteachinginthelowprecedentcontextofinstructionaldesign-2015","author_short":["Boling, E.","Gray, C. M","Smith, K. M"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","title":"Studio teaching in the low-precedent context of instructional design","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Boling"],"firstnames":["Elizabeth"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gray"],"firstnames":["Colin","M"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Smith"],"firstnames":["Kennon","M"],"suffixes":[]}],"booktitle":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design Education Researchers","publisher":"School of the Art Institute of Chicago","address":"Chicago, IL","pages":"1417–1431","abstract":"Instructional design (ID) has been a scientized field of design for half a century, which means that models and principles have been emphasized in ID education over other forms of design knowledge, including precedent. In the study of design broadly defined, precedent is well established as a form of knowledge essential to competent practice. It is plentiful and made available through multiple channels, by practitioners as well as educators. This 7-year study examines the challenges for students in learning to recognize, appreciate and use precedent in designing images to support learning. These include the need to develop analogical thinking related to the use of precedent in their own work, to recognize precedents they already use without explicit awareness, to attend to precedent and seek it independent of its immediate use. Methods used in the studio course under study are discussed, together with examples of students' design activities at each stage in the evolution of the course. Data for this study comprise detailed field notes from each class period, student work, and reflections assigned as part of the regular class assignments.","year":"2015","bibtex":"@INPROCEEDINGS{Boling2015-vg,\n title = \"Studio teaching in the low-precedent context of instructional\n design\",\n author = \"Boling, Elizabeth and Gray, Colin M and Smith, Kennon M\",\n booktitle = \"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Design\n Education Researchers\",\n publisher = \"School of the Art Institute of Chicago\",\n address = \"Chicago, IL\",\n pages = \"1417--1431\",\n abstract = \"Instructional design (ID) has been a scientized field of design\n for half a century, which means that models and principles have\n been emphasized in ID education over other forms of design\n knowledge, including precedent. In the study of design broadly\n defined, precedent is well established as a form of knowledge\n essential to competent practice. It is plentiful and made\n available through multiple channels, by practitioners as well as\n educators. This 7-year study examines the challenges for students\n in learning to recognize, appreciate and use precedent in\n designing images to support learning. These include the need to\n develop analogical thinking related to the use of precedent in\n their own work, to recognize precedents they already use without\n explicit awareness, to attend to precedent and seek it\n independent of its immediate use. Methods used in the studio\n course under study are discussed, together with examples of\n students' design activities at each stage in the evolution of the\n course. Data for this study comprise detailed field notes from\n each class period, student work, and reflections assigned as part\n of the regular class assignments.\",\n year = 2015\n}\n\r\n","author_short":["Boling, E.","Gray, C. M","Smith, K. M"],"key":"Boling2015-vg","id":"Boling2015-vg","bibbaseid":"boling-gray-smith-studioteachinginthelowprecedentcontextofinstructionaldesign-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/yEDN4DodMtih9KdtS","dataSources":["EHXzeoGkDeGY7skkh"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["studio","teaching","low","precedent","context","instructional","design","boling","gray","smith"],"title":"Studio teaching in the low-precedent context of instructional design","year":2015}