Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership. Boney, O., Bell, M., Bell, N., Conquest, A., Cumbers, M., Drake, S., Galsworthy, M., Gath, J., Grocott, M. P. W., Harris, E., Howell, S., Ingold, A., Nathanson, M. H., Pinkney, T., & Metcalf, L. BMJ open, 5(12):e010006, December, 2015. doi abstract bibtex OBJECTIVE: To identify research priorities for Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings guided by an independent adviser. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: 45 stakeholder organisations (25 professional, 20 patient/carer) affiliated as James Lind Alliance partners. OUTCOMES: First 'ideas-gathering' survey: Free text research ideas and suggestions. Second 'prioritisation' survey: Shortlist of 'summary' research questions (derived from the first survey) ranked by respondents in order of priority. Final 'top ten': Agreed by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. RESULTS: First survey: 1420 suggestions received from 623 respondents (49% patients/public) were refined into a shortlist of 92 'summary' questions. Second survey: 1718 respondents each nominated up to 10 questions as research priorities. Top ten: The 25 highest-ranked questions advanced to the final workshop, where 23 stakeholders (13 professional, 10 patient/carer) agreed the 10 most important questions: black triangle right What can we do to stop patients developing chronic pain after surgery? black triangle right How can patient care around the time of emergency surgery be improved? black triangle right What long-term harm may result from anaesthesia, particularly following repeated anaesthetics?black triangle right What outcomes should we use to measure the 'success' of anaesthesia and perioperative care? black triangle right How can we improve recovery from surgery for elderly patients? black triangle right For which patients does regional anaesthesia give better outcomes than general anaesthesia? black triangle right What are the effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain? black triangle right Do enhanced recovery programmes improve short and long-term outcomes? black triangle right How can preoperative exercise or fitness training, including physiotherapy, improve outcomes after surgery? black triangle right How can we improve communication between the teams looking after patients throughout their surgical journey? CONCLUSIONS: Almost 2000 stakeholders contributed their views regarding anaesthetic and perioperative research priorities. This is the largest example of patient and public involvement in shaping anaesthetic and perioperative research to date.
@article{boney_identifying_2015,
title = {Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint {National} {Institute} of {Academic} {Anaesthesia}/{James} {Lind} {Alliance} {Research} {Priority} {Setting} {Partnership}.},
volume = {5},
copyright = {Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/},
issn = {2044-6055 2044-6055},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To identify research priorities for Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings guided by an independent adviser. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: 45 stakeholder organisations (25 professional, 20 patient/carer) affiliated as James Lind Alliance partners. OUTCOMES: First 'ideas-gathering' survey: Free text research ideas and suggestions. Second 'prioritisation' survey: Shortlist of 'summary' research questions (derived from the first survey) ranked by respondents in order of priority. Final 'top ten': Agreed by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. RESULTS: First survey: 1420 suggestions received from 623 respondents (49\% patients/public) were refined into a shortlist of 92 'summary' questions. Second survey: 1718 respondents each nominated up to 10 questions as research priorities. Top ten: The 25 highest-ranked questions advanced to the final workshop, where 23 stakeholders (13 professional, 10 patient/carer) agreed the 10 most important questions: black triangle right What can we do to stop patients developing chronic pain after surgery? black triangle right How can patient care around the time of emergency surgery be improved? black triangle right What long-term harm may result from anaesthesia, particularly following repeated anaesthetics?black triangle right What outcomes should we use to measure the 'success' of anaesthesia and perioperative care? black triangle right How can we improve recovery from surgery for elderly patients? black triangle right For which patients does regional anaesthesia give better outcomes than general anaesthesia? black triangle right What are the effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain? black triangle right Do enhanced recovery programmes improve short and long-term outcomes? black triangle right How can preoperative exercise or fitness training, including physiotherapy, improve outcomes after surgery? black triangle right How can we improve communication between the teams looking after patients throughout their surgical journey? CONCLUSIONS: Almost 2000 stakeholders contributed their views regarding anaesthetic and perioperative research priorities. This is the largest example of patient and public involvement in shaping anaesthetic and perioperative research to date.},
language = {eng},
number = {12},
journal = {BMJ open},
author = {Boney, Oliver and Bell, Madeline and Bell, Natalie and Conquest, Ann and Cumbers, Marion and Drake, Sharon and Galsworthy, Mike and Gath, Jacqui and Grocott, Michael P. W. and Harris, Emma and Howell, Simon and Ingold, Anthony and Nathanson, Michael H. and Pinkney, Thomas and Metcalf, Leanne},
month = dec,
year = {2015},
pmid = {26674506},
pmcid = {PMC4691782},
keywords = {*Biomedical Research, ANAESTHETICS, Anesthesia/adverse effects/*methods, Humans, INTENSIVE \& CRITICAL CARE, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team/organization \& administration, Perioperative Care/adverse effects/*methods, Postoperative Complications/prevention \& control, SURGERY, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom},
pages = {e010006},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"hbLYj8QmcS8jt4EqS","bibbaseid":"boney-bell-bell-conquest-cumbers-drake-galsworthy-gath-etal-identifyingresearchprioritiesinanaesthesiaandperioperativecarefinalreportofthejointnationalinstituteofacademicanaesthesiajameslindallianceresearchprioritysettingpartnership-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-22T11:20:08.516Z","title":"Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.","author_short":["Boney, O.","Bell, M.","Bell, N.","Conquest, A.","Cumbers, M.","Drake, S.","Galsworthy, M.","Gath, J.","Grocott, M. P. W.","Harris, E.","Howell, S.","Ingold, A.","Nathanson, M. H.","Pinkney, T.","Metcalf, L."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2278468/items?key=VdI1Arfo5ouMqRbfhtn5L0oK&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.","volume":"5","copyright":"Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/","issn":"2044-6055 2044-6055","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006","abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To identify research priorities for Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings guided by an independent adviser. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: 45 stakeholder organisations (25 professional, 20 patient/carer) affiliated as James Lind Alliance partners. OUTCOMES: First 'ideas-gathering' survey: Free text research ideas and suggestions. Second 'prioritisation' survey: Shortlist of 'summary' research questions (derived from the first survey) ranked by respondents in order of priority. Final 'top ten': Agreed by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. RESULTS: First survey: 1420 suggestions received from 623 respondents (49% patients/public) were refined into a shortlist of 92 'summary' questions. Second survey: 1718 respondents each nominated up to 10 questions as research priorities. Top ten: The 25 highest-ranked questions advanced to the final workshop, where 23 stakeholders (13 professional, 10 patient/carer) agreed the 10 most important questions: black triangle right What can we do to stop patients developing chronic pain after surgery? black triangle right How can patient care around the time of emergency surgery be improved? black triangle right What long-term harm may result from anaesthesia, particularly following repeated anaesthetics?black triangle right What outcomes should we use to measure the 'success' of anaesthesia and perioperative care? black triangle right How can we improve recovery from surgery for elderly patients? black triangle right For which patients does regional anaesthesia give better outcomes than general anaesthesia? black triangle right What are the effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain? black triangle right Do enhanced recovery programmes improve short and long-term outcomes? black triangle right How can preoperative exercise or fitness training, including physiotherapy, improve outcomes after surgery? black triangle right How can we improve communication between the teams looking after patients throughout their surgical journey? CONCLUSIONS: Almost 2000 stakeholders contributed their views regarding anaesthetic and perioperative research priorities. This is the largest example of patient and public involvement in shaping anaesthetic and perioperative research to date.","language":"eng","number":"12","journal":"BMJ open","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Boney"],"firstnames":["Oliver"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bell"],"firstnames":["Madeline"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bell"],"firstnames":["Natalie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Conquest"],"firstnames":["Ann"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cumbers"],"firstnames":["Marion"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Drake"],"firstnames":["Sharon"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Galsworthy"],"firstnames":["Mike"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gath"],"firstnames":["Jacqui"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Grocott"],"firstnames":["Michael","P.","W."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Harris"],"firstnames":["Emma"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Howell"],"firstnames":["Simon"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ingold"],"firstnames":["Anthony"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nathanson"],"firstnames":["Michael","H."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pinkney"],"firstnames":["Thomas"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Metcalf"],"firstnames":["Leanne"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2015","pmid":"26674506","pmcid":"PMC4691782","keywords":"*Biomedical Research, ANAESTHETICS, Anesthesia/adverse effects/*methods, Humans, INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team/organization & administration, Perioperative Care/adverse effects/*methods, Postoperative Complications/prevention & control, SURGERY, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom","pages":"e010006","bibtex":"@article{boney_identifying_2015,\n\ttitle = {Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint {National} {Institute} of {Academic} {Anaesthesia}/{James} {Lind} {Alliance} {Research} {Priority} {Setting} {Partnership}.},\n\tvolume = {5},\n\tcopyright = {Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/},\n\tissn = {2044-6055 2044-6055},\n\tdoi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006},\n\tabstract = {OBJECTIVE: To identify research priorities for Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine. DESIGN: Prospective surveys and consensus meetings guided by an independent adviser. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: 45 stakeholder organisations (25 professional, 20 patient/carer) affiliated as James Lind Alliance partners. OUTCOMES: First 'ideas-gathering' survey: Free text research ideas and suggestions. Second 'prioritisation' survey: Shortlist of 'summary' research questions (derived from the first survey) ranked by respondents in order of priority. Final 'top ten': Agreed by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. RESULTS: First survey: 1420 suggestions received from 623 respondents (49\\% patients/public) were refined into a shortlist of 92 'summary' questions. Second survey: 1718 respondents each nominated up to 10 questions as research priorities. Top ten: The 25 highest-ranked questions advanced to the final workshop, where 23 stakeholders (13 professional, 10 patient/carer) agreed the 10 most important questions: black triangle right What can we do to stop patients developing chronic pain after surgery? black triangle right How can patient care around the time of emergency surgery be improved? black triangle right What long-term harm may result from anaesthesia, particularly following repeated anaesthetics?black triangle right What outcomes should we use to measure the 'success' of anaesthesia and perioperative care? black triangle right How can we improve recovery from surgery for elderly patients? black triangle right For which patients does regional anaesthesia give better outcomes than general anaesthesia? black triangle right What are the effects of anaesthesia on the developing brain? black triangle right Do enhanced recovery programmes improve short and long-term outcomes? black triangle right How can preoperative exercise or fitness training, including physiotherapy, improve outcomes after surgery? black triangle right How can we improve communication between the teams looking after patients throughout their surgical journey? CONCLUSIONS: Almost 2000 stakeholders contributed their views regarding anaesthetic and perioperative research priorities. This is the largest example of patient and public involvement in shaping anaesthetic and perioperative research to date.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {12},\n\tjournal = {BMJ open},\n\tauthor = {Boney, Oliver and Bell, Madeline and Bell, Natalie and Conquest, Ann and Cumbers, Marion and Drake, Sharon and Galsworthy, Mike and Gath, Jacqui and Grocott, Michael P. W. and Harris, Emma and Howell, Simon and Ingold, Anthony and Nathanson, Michael H. and Pinkney, Thomas and Metcalf, Leanne},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpmid = {26674506},\n\tpmcid = {PMC4691782},\n\tkeywords = {*Biomedical Research, ANAESTHETICS, Anesthesia/adverse effects/*methods, Humans, INTENSIVE \\& CRITICAL CARE, Interprofessional Relations, Patient Care Team/organization \\& administration, Perioperative Care/adverse effects/*methods, Postoperative Complications/prevention \\& control, SURGERY, Surveys and Questionnaires, United Kingdom},\n\tpages = {e010006},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Boney, O.","Bell, M.","Bell, N.","Conquest, A.","Cumbers, M.","Drake, S.","Galsworthy, M.","Gath, J.","Grocott, M. P. W.","Harris, E.","Howell, S.","Ingold, A.","Nathanson, M. H.","Pinkney, T.","Metcalf, L."],"key":"boney_identifying_2015","id":"boney_identifying_2015","bibbaseid":"boney-bell-bell-conquest-cumbers-drake-galsworthy-gath-etal-identifyingresearchprioritiesinanaesthesiaandperioperativecarefinalreportofthejointnationalinstituteofacademicanaesthesiajameslindallianceresearchprioritysettingpartnership-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["*Biomedical Research","ANAESTHETICS","Anesthesia/adverse effects/*methods","Humans","INTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE","Interprofessional Relations","Patient Care Team/organization & administration","Perioperative Care/adverse effects/*methods","Postoperative Complications/prevention & control","SURGERY","Surveys and Questionnaires","United Kingdom"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"search_terms":["identifying","research","priorities","anaesthesia","perioperative","care","final","report","joint","national","institute","academic","anaesthesia","james","lind","alliance","research","priority","setting","partnership","boney","bell","bell","conquest","cumbers","drake","galsworthy","gath","grocott","harris","howell","ingold","nathanson","pinkney","metcalf"],"keywords":["*biomedical research","anaesthetics","anesthesia/adverse effects/*methods","humans","intensive & critical care","interprofessional relations","patient care team/organization & administration","perioperative care/adverse effects/*methods","postoperative complications/prevention & control","surgery","surveys and questionnaires","united kingdom"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["ivGRqSmQG9yohsm35"]}