@article{88ca81af963648ed876694828c0a28df,
  title     = "Modelling Collective Decision Making in Groups and Crowds: Integrating Social Contagion and Interacting Emotions, Beliefs and Intentions",
  abstract  = "Collective decision making involves on the one hand individual mental states such as beliefs, emotions and intentions, and on the other hand interaction with others with possibly different mental states. Achieving a satisfactory common group decision on which all agree requires that such mental states are adapted to each other by social interaction. Recent developments in social neuroscience have revealed neural mechanisms by which such mutual adaptation can be realised. These mechanisms not only enable intentions to converge to an emerging common decision, but at the same time enable to achieve shared underlying individual beliefs and emotions. This paper presents a computational model for such processes. As an application of the model, an agent-based analysis was made of patterns in crowd behaviour, in particular to simulate a real-life incident that took place on May 4, 2010 in Amsterdam. From available video material and witness reports, useful empirical data were extracted. Similar patterns were achieved in simulations, whereby some of the parameters of the model were tuned to the case addressed, and most parameters were assigned default values. The results show the inclusion of contagion of belief, emotion, and intention states of agents results in better reproduction of the incident than non-inclusion. © 2012 The Author(s).",
  author    = "T. Bosse and M. Hoogendoorn and M.C.A. Klein and J. Treur and {van der Wal}, C.N. and {van Wissen}, A.",
  year      = "2013",
  doi       = "10.1007/s10458-012-9201-1",
  volume    = "27",
  pages     = "52--84",
  journal   = "Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems",
  issn      = "1387-2532",
  publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
  number    = "1",
}

{"_id":"3FsEcKK453pdPix3T","bibbaseid":"bosse-hoogendoorn-klein-treur-vanderwal-vanwissen-modellingcollectivedecisionmakingingroupsandcrowdsintegratingsocialcontagionandinteractingemotionsbeliefsandintentions-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-06-06T19:13:39.406Z","title":"Modelling Collective Decision Making in Groups and Crowds: Integrating Social Contagion and Interacting Emotions, Beliefs and Intentions","author_short":["Bosse, T.","Hoogendoorn, M.","Klein, M.","Treur, J.","van der Wal , C.","van Wissen , A."],"year":2013,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/KRRVU/website/master/publications/krr.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Modelling Collective Decision Making in Groups and Crowds: Integrating Social Contagion and Interacting Emotions, Beliefs and Intentions","abstract":"Collective decision making involves on the one hand individual mental states such as beliefs, emotions and intentions, and on the other hand interaction with others with possibly different mental states. Achieving a satisfactory common group decision on which all agree requires that such mental states are adapted to each other by social interaction. Recent developments in social neuroscience have revealed neural mechanisms by which such mutual adaptation can be realised. These mechanisms not only enable intentions to converge to an emerging common decision, but at the same time enable to achieve shared underlying individual beliefs and emotions. This paper presents a computational model for such processes. As an application of the model, an agent-based analysis was made of patterns in crowd behaviour, in particular to simulate a real-life incident that took place on May 4, 2010 in Amsterdam. From available video material and witness reports, useful empirical data were extracted. Similar patterns were achieved in simulations, whereby some of the parameters of the model were tuned to the case addressed, and most parameters were assigned default values. The results show the inclusion of contagion of belief, emotion, and intention states of agents results in better reproduction of the incident than non-inclusion. © 2012 The Author(s).","author":[{"firstnames":["T."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bosse"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["M."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hoogendoorn"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["M.C.A."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Klein"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["J."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Treur"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van der Wal"],"lastnames":[],"firstnames":["C.N."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["van Wissen"],"lastnames":[],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2013","doi":"10.1007/s10458-012-9201-1","volume":"27","pages":"52–84","journal":"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems","issn":"1387-2532","publisher":"Springer Netherlands","number":"1","bibtex":"@article{88ca81af963648ed876694828c0a28df,\n title = \"Modelling Collective Decision Making in Groups and Crowds: Integrating Social Contagion and Interacting Emotions, Beliefs and Intentions\",\n abstract = \"Collective decision making involves on the one hand individual mental states such as beliefs, emotions and intentions, and on the other hand interaction with others with possibly different mental states. Achieving a satisfactory common group decision on which all agree requires that such mental states are adapted to each other by social interaction. Recent developments in social neuroscience have revealed neural mechanisms by which such mutual adaptation can be realised. These mechanisms not only enable intentions to converge to an emerging common decision, but at the same time enable to achieve shared underlying individual beliefs and emotions. This paper presents a computational model for such processes. As an application of the model, an agent-based analysis was made of patterns in crowd behaviour, in particular to simulate a real-life incident that took place on May 4, 2010 in Amsterdam. From available video material and witness reports, useful empirical data were extracted. Similar patterns were achieved in simulations, whereby some of the parameters of the model were tuned to the case addressed, and most parameters were assigned default values. The results show the inclusion of contagion of belief, emotion, and intention states of agents results in better reproduction of the incident than non-inclusion. © 2012 The Author(s).\",\n author = \"T. Bosse and M. Hoogendoorn and M.C.A. Klein and J. Treur and {van der Wal}, C.N. and {van Wissen}, A.\",\n year = \"2013\",\n doi = \"10.1007/s10458-012-9201-1\",\n volume = \"27\",\n pages = \"52--84\",\n journal = \"Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems\",\n issn = \"1387-2532\",\n publisher = \"Springer Netherlands\",\n number = \"1\",\n}\n\n\n","author_short":["Bosse, T.","Hoogendoorn, M.","Klein, M.","Treur, J.","van der Wal , C.","van Wissen , A."],"key":"88ca81af963648ed876694828c0a28df","id":"88ca81af963648ed876694828c0a28df","bibbaseid":"bosse-hoogendoorn-klein-treur-vanderwal-vanwissen-modellingcollectivedecisionmakingingroupsandcrowdsintegratingsocialcontagionandinteractingemotionsbeliefsandintentions-2013","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["modelling","collective","decision","making","groups","crowds","integrating","social","contagion","interacting","emotions","beliefs","intentions","bosse","hoogendoorn","klein","treur","van der wal ","van wissen "],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["H6xuGqu5uQ6rXhdJ4","dJmTXpbSWWjnxatYT"]}