@article{bowden_critique_2004,
	title = {A {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on "{Art} and {Agency}" [{Corrected} title: {A} {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on {Art} and {Agency}]},
	volume = {74},
	issn = {0029-8077},
	shorttitle = {A {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on "{Art} and {Agency}" [{Corrected} title},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/40332070},
	abstract = {This review article examines in detail the argument in Alfred Gell's posthumously published book Art and Agency: an anthropological theory. The review is divided into two parts. In the first I summarise the main argument of each chapter in turn and comment on some of the author's more questionable assumptions and conclusions. In the second I step back from the individual chapters and comment on three of the more general issues the book raises.},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2018-03-04},
	journal = {Oceania},
	author = {Bowden, Ross},
	editor = {Gell, Alfred},
	year = {2004},
	pages = {309--324},
}

{"_id":"psibAyBBbF2dcrwM7","bibbaseid":"bowden-acritiqueofalfredgellonartandagencycorrectedtitleacritiqueofalfredgellonartandagency-2004","author_short":["Bowden, R."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A Critique of Alfred Gell on \"Art and Agency\" [Corrected title: A Critique of Alfred Gell on Art and Agency]","volume":"74","issn":"0029-8077","shorttitle":"A Critique of Alfred Gell on \"Art and Agency\" [Corrected title","url":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/40332070","abstract":"This review article examines in detail the argument in Alfred Gell's posthumously published book Art and Agency: an anthropological theory. The review is divided into two parts. In the first I summarise the main argument of each chapter in turn and comment on some of the author's more questionable assumptions and conclusions. In the second I step back from the individual chapters and comment on three of the more general issues the book raises.","number":"4","urldate":"2018-03-04","journal":"Oceania","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bowden"],"firstnames":["Ross"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gell"],"firstnames":["Alfred"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2004","pages":"309–324","bibtex":"@article{bowden_critique_2004,\n\ttitle = {A {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on \"{Art} and {Agency}\" [{Corrected} title: {A} {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on {Art} and {Agency}]},\n\tvolume = {74},\n\tissn = {0029-8077},\n\tshorttitle = {A {Critique} of {Alfred} {Gell} on \"{Art} and {Agency}\" [{Corrected} title},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/40332070},\n\tabstract = {This review article examines in detail the argument in Alfred Gell's posthumously published book Art and Agency: an anthropological theory. The review is divided into two parts. In the first I summarise the main argument of each chapter in turn and comment on some of the author's more questionable assumptions and conclusions. In the second I step back from the individual chapters and comment on three of the more general issues the book raises.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2018-03-04},\n\tjournal = {Oceania},\n\tauthor = {Bowden, Ross},\n\teditor = {Gell, Alfred},\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tpages = {309--324},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Bowden, R."],"editor_short":["Gell, A."],"key":"bowden_critique_2004","id":"bowden_critique_2004","bibbaseid":"bowden-acritiqueofalfredgellonartandagencycorrectedtitleacritiqueofalfredgellonartandagency-2004","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/40332070"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/ChristinaFClarke","dataSources":["BL7jY4fWcAmJ6Mm4i"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["critique","alfred","gell","art","agency","corrected","title","critique","alfred","gell","art","agency","bowden"],"title":"A Critique of Alfred Gell on \"Art and Agency\" [Corrected title: A Critique of Alfred Gell on Art and Agency]","year":2004}