Accuracy of Mobile Phone Pedometer Technology. Boyce, G. & Padmasekara, G. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine, 2012.
Accuracy of Mobile Phone Pedometer Technology [link]Website  abstract   bibtex   
**Background**: Moderate to high intensity activity is an important component in weight loss. The ability to use free technology to monitor activity would provide a useful clinical tool. **Methods**: Three popular pedometer mobile applications ( ” iSteps Lite”, ” Pedometer Lite” and ” Lyr Free”) were compared to a conventional pedometer. Outcome measures included step recording, speed estimate, distance recorded over a fixed distance and steps recorded during car travel. **Results**: All devices show inaccuracy in step count and speed estimate at varying intensities of activity. For measurement of 100 steps at medium intensity activity, the range of recorded step counts detected at medium sensitivity was 69.3 to 101.3. Valid and reliable results for step count were seen with the control pedometer and with one program at moderate sensitivity settings for moderate and high intensity activity. The most accurate distance recorded and estimate of speed over a fixed distance was from a program with Global Positioning System (GPS) functionality. **Conclusion**: It is possible to determine a step count as accurate as a control pedometer with careful selection of program and calibration. When exercising over a distance, a program with GPS functionality leads to the most accurate determination of speed estimate and distance recorded.
@article{
 title = {Accuracy of Mobile Phone Pedometer Technology},
 type = {article},
 year = {2012},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {accelerometer,pedometer},
 volume = {1},
 websites = {http://www.journalmtm.com/2012/accuracy-of-mobile-phone-pedometer-technology},
 id = {4df14bd6-6795-37e5-8090-55b7b1dbb6c5},
 created = {2018-07-12T21:32:24.617Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {f954d000-ce94-3da6-bd26-b983145a920f},
 group_id = {b0b145a3-980e-3ad7-a16f-c93918c606ed},
 last_modified = {2018-07-12T21:32:24.617Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {boyce-accuracy12},
 source_type = {article},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {**Background**: Moderate to high intensity activity is an important component in weight loss. The ability to use free technology to monitor activity would provide a useful clinical tool.

**Methods**: Three popular pedometer mobile applications ( ” iSteps Lite”, ” Pedometer Lite” and ” Lyr Free”) were compared to a conventional pedometer. Outcome measures included step recording, speed estimate, distance recorded over a fixed distance and steps recorded during car travel.

**Results**: All devices show inaccuracy in step count and speed estimate at varying intensities of activity. For measurement of 100 steps at medium intensity activity, the range of recorded step counts detected at medium sensitivity was 69.3 to 101.3. Valid and reliable results for step count were seen with the control pedometer and with one program at moderate sensitivity settings for moderate and high intensity activity. The most accurate distance recorded and estimate of speed over a fixed distance was from a program with Global Positioning System (GPS) functionality.

**Conclusion**: It is possible to determine a step count as accurate as a control pedometer with careful selection of program and calibration. When exercising over a distance, a program with GPS functionality leads to the most accurate determination of speed estimate and distance recorded.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Boyce, G and Padmasekara, G},
 journal = {Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine},
 number = {2}
}

Downloads: 0