@inProceedings{
 title = {Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously},
 type = {inProceedings},
 year = {2004},
 pages = {210-221},
 websites = {//www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/breuker/fois-2004-paper.pdf},
 publisher = {IOS-Press},
 id = {871a32f4-af6c-35cc-be53-576060f8febf},
 created = {2011-03-10T12:48:45.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {d8f38c89-3cfb-38c8-96b8-ce565eef7803},
 last_modified = {2011-03-10T12:51:22.000Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Breuker:04b},
 source_type = {inproceedings},
 abstract = {In this paper we present LRI-Core, 
a core ontology for covering domains of law. After a decade of developing many ontologies for legal domains and applications, 
the need for a unifying core ontology that covers the main concepts that are common to all legal domains became very apparent. It can be argued that not only these domains have a predominant common-sense character ? the law is still for the people ? but also that typical legal concepts such as norm, 
role responsibility, 
contract, 
etc. have still a grounding in abstract common-sense conceptualizations. This common sense grounding is lacking in various upper- or foundational ontologies developed thus far. The paper presents a number of design principles that follow from the common-sense stance in developing the LRI-Core: the most important being cognitive plausibility. From this perspective, 
knowledge about the physical world, 
with the central notions of object and process is taken as a basis for metaphorizing mental and abstract worlds. The intentional stance that differentiates the physical world from the mental world is also the basis for the creation of a behavioural world of roles. In summary, 
LRI-Core starts with four main categories: physical classes, 
mental classes, 
roles, 
and abstract classes. A fifth category consists of terms for occurrences, 
which are used to talk about instances (situations) in a generic way.},
 bibtype = {inProceedings},
 author = {Breuker, Joost and Hoekstra, Rinke},
 booktitle = {Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems FOIS-2004}
}

{"_id":"gRKptvdyyahyW3fMh","bibbaseid":"breuker-hoekstra-coreconceptsoflawtakingcommonsenseseriously-2004","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-09-28T14:33:02.006Z","title":"Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously","author_short":["Breuker, J.","Hoekstra, R."],"year":2004,"bibtype":"inProceedings","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously","type":"inProceedings","year":"2004","pages":"210-221","websites":"//www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/breuker/fois-2004-paper.pdf","publisher":"IOS-Press","id":"871a32f4-af6c-35cc-be53-576060f8febf","created":"2011-03-10T12:48:45.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"d8f38c89-3cfb-38c8-96b8-ce565eef7803","last_modified":"2011-03-10T12:51:22.000Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Breuker:04b","source_type":"inproceedings","abstract":"In this paper we present LRI-Core, \na core ontology for covering domains of law. After a decade of developing many ontologies for legal domains and applications, \nthe need for a unifying core ontology that covers the main concepts that are common to all legal domains became very apparent. It can be argued that not only these domains have a predominant common-sense character ? the law is still for the people ? but also that typical legal concepts such as norm, \nrole responsibility, \ncontract, \netc. have still a grounding in abstract common-sense conceptualizations. This common sense grounding is lacking in various upper- or foundational ontologies developed thus far. The paper presents a number of design principles that follow from the common-sense stance in developing the LRI-Core: the most important being cognitive plausibility. From this perspective, \nknowledge about the physical world, \nwith the central notions of object and process is taken as a basis for metaphorizing mental and abstract worlds. The intentional stance that differentiates the physical world from the mental world is also the basis for the creation of a behavioural world of roles. In summary, \nLRI-Core starts with four main categories: physical classes, \nmental classes, \nroles, \nand abstract classes. A fifth category consists of terms for occurrences, \nwhich are used to talk about instances (situations) in a generic way.","bibtype":"inProceedings","author":"Breuker, Joost and Hoekstra, Rinke","booktitle":"Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems FOIS-2004","bibtex":"@inProceedings{\n title = {Core concepts of law: taking common-sense seriously},\n type = {inProceedings},\n year = {2004},\n pages = {210-221},\n websites = {//www.leibnizcenter.org/docs/breuker/fois-2004-paper.pdf},\n publisher = {IOS-Press},\n id = {871a32f4-af6c-35cc-be53-576060f8febf},\n created = {2011-03-10T12:48:45.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {d8f38c89-3cfb-38c8-96b8-ce565eef7803},\n last_modified = {2011-03-10T12:51:22.000Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Breuker:04b},\n source_type = {inproceedings},\n abstract = {In this paper we present LRI-Core, \na core ontology for covering domains of law. After a decade of developing many ontologies for legal domains and applications, \nthe need for a unifying core ontology that covers the main concepts that are common to all legal domains became very apparent. It can be argued that not only these domains have a predominant common-sense character ? the law is still for the people ? but also that typical legal concepts such as norm, \nrole responsibility, \ncontract, \netc. have still a grounding in abstract common-sense conceptualizations. This common sense grounding is lacking in various upper- or foundational ontologies developed thus far. The paper presents a number of design principles that follow from the common-sense stance in developing the LRI-Core: the most important being cognitive plausibility. From this perspective, \nknowledge about the physical world, \nwith the central notions of object and process is taken as a basis for metaphorizing mental and abstract worlds. The intentional stance that differentiates the physical world from the mental world is also the basis for the creation of a behavioural world of roles. In summary, \nLRI-Core starts with four main categories: physical classes, \nmental classes, \nroles, \nand abstract classes. A fifth category consists of terms for occurrences, \nwhich are used to talk about instances (situations) in a generic way.},\n bibtype = {inProceedings},\n author = {Breuker, Joost and Hoekstra, Rinke},\n booktitle = {Proceedings of Formal Ontologies in Information Systems FOIS-2004}\n}","author_short":["Breuker, J.","Hoekstra, R."],"bibbaseid":"breuker-hoekstra-coreconceptsoflawtakingcommonsenseseriously-2004","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["core","concepts","law","taking","common","sense","seriously","breuker","hoekstra"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}