Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’: Writing pesticides, poverty and political engagement in Latin America. Brisbois, B. W. Social Studies of Science, 44(4):600–624, 2014. 1doi abstract bibtex The growth of the field of global health has prompted renewed interest in discursive aspects of North–South biomedical encounters, but analysis of the role of disciplinary identities and writing conventions remains scarce. In this article, I examine ways of framing pesticide problems in 88 peer-reviewed epidemiology papers produced by Northerners and their collaborators studying pesticide-related health impacts in Latin America. I identify prominent geographic frames in which truncated and selective histories of Latin America are used to justify research projects in specific research sites, which nevertheless function rhetorically as generic ‘developing country’ settings. These frames legitimize health sector interventions as solutions to pesticide-related health problems, largely avoiding more politically charged possibilities. In contrast, some epidemiologists appear to be actively pushing the bounds of epidemiology’s traditional journal article genre by engaging with considerations of political power, especially that of the international pesticide industry. I therefore employ a finer-grained analysis to a subsample of 20 papers to explore how the writing conventions of epidemiology interact with portrayals of poverty and pesticides in Latin America. Through analysis of a minor scientific controversy, authorial presence in epidemiology articles, and variance of framing strategies across genres, I show how the tension between ‘objectivity’ and ‘advocacy’ observed in Northern epidemiology and public health is expressed in North–South interaction. I end by discussing implications for postcolonial and socially engaged approaches to science and technology studies, as well as their relevance to the actual practice of global health research. In particular, the complicated interaction of the conflicted traditions of Northern epidemiology with Latin American settings on paper hints at a far more complex interaction in the form of public health programming involving researchers and research participants who differ by nationality, ethnicity, gender, profession, and class. © The Author(s) 2014.
@article{brisbois_epidemiology_2014,
title = {Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’: {Writing} pesticides, poverty and political engagement in {Latin} {America}},
volume = {44},
shorttitle = {Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’},
doi = {10.1177/0306312714523514},
abstract = {The growth of the field of global health has prompted renewed interest in discursive aspects of North–South biomedical encounters, but analysis of the role of disciplinary identities and writing conventions remains scarce. In this article, I examine ways of framing pesticide problems in 88 peer-reviewed epidemiology papers produced by Northerners and their collaborators studying pesticide-related health impacts in Latin America. I identify prominent geographic frames in which truncated and selective histories of Latin America are used to justify research projects in specific research sites, which nevertheless function rhetorically as generic ‘developing country’ settings. These frames legitimize health sector interventions as solutions to pesticide-related health problems, largely avoiding more politically charged possibilities. In contrast, some epidemiologists appear to be actively pushing the bounds of epidemiology’s traditional journal article genre by engaging with considerations of political power, especially that of the international pesticide industry. I therefore employ a finer-grained analysis to a subsample of 20 papers to explore how the writing conventions of epidemiology interact with portrayals of poverty and pesticides in Latin America. Through analysis of a minor scientific controversy, authorial presence in epidemiology articles, and variance of framing strategies across genres, I show how the tension between ‘objectivity’ and ‘advocacy’ observed in Northern epidemiology and public health is expressed in North–South interaction. I end by discussing implications for postcolonial and socially engaged approaches to science and technology studies, as well as their relevance to the actual practice of global health research. In particular, the complicated interaction of the conflicted traditions of Northern epidemiology with Latin American settings on paper hints at a far more complex interaction in the form of public health programming involving researchers and research participants who differ by nationality, ethnicity, gender, profession, and class. © The Author(s) 2014.},
language = {en},
number = {4},
journal = {Social Studies of Science},
author = {Brisbois, Ben W.},
year = {2014},
note = {1},
keywords = {1 Learned ignorance, Discourse, Epidemiology, Global health, Ignorance savante, Latin America, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Pesticide, Postcolonial, Scale politics, Scientific writing},
pages = {600--624},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"z5ceWejnD8JvxNg4s","bibbaseid":"brisbois-epidemiologyanddevelopingcountrieswritingpesticidespovertyandpoliticalengagementinlatinamerica-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-09-05T12:55:56.080Z","title":"Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’: Writing pesticides, poverty and political engagement in Latin America","author_short":["Brisbois, B. W."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’: Writing pesticides, poverty and political engagement in Latin America","volume":"44","shorttitle":"Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’","doi":"10.1177/0306312714523514","abstract":"The growth of the field of global health has prompted renewed interest in discursive aspects of North–South biomedical encounters, but analysis of the role of disciplinary identities and writing conventions remains scarce. In this article, I examine ways of framing pesticide problems in 88 peer-reviewed epidemiology papers produced by Northerners and their collaborators studying pesticide-related health impacts in Latin America. I identify prominent geographic frames in which truncated and selective histories of Latin America are used to justify research projects in specific research sites, which nevertheless function rhetorically as generic ‘developing country’ settings. These frames legitimize health sector interventions as solutions to pesticide-related health problems, largely avoiding more politically charged possibilities. In contrast, some epidemiologists appear to be actively pushing the bounds of epidemiology’s traditional journal article genre by engaging with considerations of political power, especially that of the international pesticide industry. I therefore employ a finer-grained analysis to a subsample of 20 papers to explore how the writing conventions of epidemiology interact with portrayals of poverty and pesticides in Latin America. Through analysis of a minor scientific controversy, authorial presence in epidemiology articles, and variance of framing strategies across genres, I show how the tension between ‘objectivity’ and ‘advocacy’ observed in Northern epidemiology and public health is expressed in North–South interaction. I end by discussing implications for postcolonial and socially engaged approaches to science and technology studies, as well as their relevance to the actual practice of global health research. In particular, the complicated interaction of the conflicted traditions of Northern epidemiology with Latin American settings on paper hints at a far more complex interaction in the form of public health programming involving researchers and research participants who differ by nationality, ethnicity, gender, profession, and class. © The Author(s) 2014.","language":"en","number":"4","journal":"Social Studies of Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brisbois"],"firstnames":["Ben","W."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2014","note":"1","keywords":"1 Learned ignorance, Discourse, Epidemiology, Global health, Ignorance savante, Latin America, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Pesticide, Postcolonial, Scale politics, Scientific writing","pages":"600–624","bibtex":"@article{brisbois_epidemiology_2014,\n\ttitle = {Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’: {Writing} pesticides, poverty and political engagement in {Latin} {America}},\n\tvolume = {44},\n\tshorttitle = {Epidemiology and ‘developing countries’},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0306312714523514},\n\tabstract = {The growth of the field of global health has prompted renewed interest in discursive aspects of North–South biomedical encounters, but analysis of the role of disciplinary identities and writing conventions remains scarce. In this article, I examine ways of framing pesticide problems in 88 peer-reviewed epidemiology papers produced by Northerners and their collaborators studying pesticide-related health impacts in Latin America. I identify prominent geographic frames in which truncated and selective histories of Latin America are used to justify research projects in specific research sites, which nevertheless function rhetorically as generic ‘developing country’ settings. These frames legitimize health sector interventions as solutions to pesticide-related health problems, largely avoiding more politically charged possibilities. In contrast, some epidemiologists appear to be actively pushing the bounds of epidemiology’s traditional journal article genre by engaging with considerations of political power, especially that of the international pesticide industry. I therefore employ a finer-grained analysis to a subsample of 20 papers to explore how the writing conventions of epidemiology interact with portrayals of poverty and pesticides in Latin America. Through analysis of a minor scientific controversy, authorial presence in epidemiology articles, and variance of framing strategies across genres, I show how the tension between ‘objectivity’ and ‘advocacy’ observed in Northern epidemiology and public health is expressed in North–South interaction. I end by discussing implications for postcolonial and socially engaged approaches to science and technology studies, as well as their relevance to the actual practice of global health research. In particular, the complicated interaction of the conflicted traditions of Northern epidemiology with Latin American settings on paper hints at a far more complex interaction in the form of public health programming involving researchers and research participants who differ by nationality, ethnicity, gender, profession, and class. © The Author(s) 2014.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {Social Studies of Science},\n\tauthor = {Brisbois, Ben W.},\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tnote = {1},\n\tkeywords = {1 Learned ignorance, Discourse, Epidemiology, Global health, Ignorance savante, Latin America, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Pesticide, Postcolonial, Scale politics, Scientific writing},\n\tpages = {600--624},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Brisbois, B. W."],"key":"brisbois_epidemiology_2014","id":"brisbois_epidemiology_2014","bibbaseid":"brisbois-epidemiologyanddevelopingcountrieswritingpesticidespovertyandpoliticalengagementinlatinamerica-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["1 Learned ignorance","Discourse","Epidemiology","Global health","Ignorance savante","Latin America","PRINTED (Fonds papier)","Pesticide","Postcolonial","Scale politics","Scientific writing"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["epidemiology","developing","countries","writing","pesticides","poverty","political","engagement","latin","america","brisbois"],"keywords":["1 learned ignorance","discourse","epidemiology","global health","ignorance savante","latin america","printed (fonds papier)","pesticide","postcolonial","scale politics","scientific writing"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}