@article{
 title = {An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation},
 type = {article},
 year = {2017},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 websites = {http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215},
 publisher = {Annual Reviews},
 day = {4},
 id = {fa63007f-8976-3a02-8872-fd05c9644f25},
 created = {2016-08-21T22:18:41.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},
 group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},
 last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 source_type = {JOUR},
 notes = {doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215; 01},
 folder_uuids = {464747a5-2dff-40de-99d3-45c33921bb9e},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.; Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Brown, C H and Curran, Geoffrey and Palinkas, Lawrence A and Aarons, Gregory A and Wells, Kenneth B and Jones, Loretta and Collins, Linda M and Duan, Naihua and Mittman, Brian S and Wallace, Andrea and Tabak, Rachel G and Ducharme, Lori and Chambers, David and Neta, Gila and Wiley, Tisha and Landsverk, John and Cheung, Ken and Cruden, Gracelyn},
 journal = {Annual Review of Public Health}
}

{"_id":"zzXxaPXRyd8twZXEk","bibbaseid":"brown-curran-palinkas-aarons-wells-jones-collins-duan-etal-anoverviewofresearchandevaluationdesignsfordisseminationandimplementation-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-23T19:05:20.714Z","title":"An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation","author_short":["Brown, C., H.","Curran, G.","Palinkas, L., A.","Aarons, G., A.","Wells, K., B.","Jones, L.","Collins, L., M.","Duan, N.","Mittman, B., S.","Wallace, A.","Tabak, R., G.","Ducharme, L.","Chambers, D.","Neta, G.","Wiley, T.","Landsverk, J.","Cheung, K.","Cruden, G."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation","type":"article","year":"2017","identifiers":"[object Object]","websites":"http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215","publisher":"Annual Reviews","day":"4","id":"fa63007f-8976-3a02-8872-fd05c9644f25","created":"2016-08-21T22:18:41.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597","group_id":"408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4","last_modified":"2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","notes":"doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215; 01","folder_uuids":"464747a5-2dff-40de-99d3-45c33921bb9e","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.; Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.","bibtype":"article","author":"Brown, C H and Curran, Geoffrey and Palinkas, Lawrence A and Aarons, Gregory A and Wells, Kenneth B and Jones, Loretta and Collins, Linda M and Duan, Naihua and Mittman, Brian S and Wallace, Andrea and Tabak, Rachel G and Ducharme, Lori and Chambers, David and Neta, Gila and Wiley, Tisha and Landsverk, John and Cheung, Ken and Cruden, Gracelyn","journal":"Annual Review of Public Health","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {An Overview of Research and Evaluation Designs for Dissemination and Implementation},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n websites = {http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215},\n publisher = {Annual Reviews},\n day = {4},\n id = {fa63007f-8976-3a02-8872-fd05c9644f25},\n created = {2016-08-21T22:18:41.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},\n group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},\n last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n notes = {doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215; 01},\n folder_uuids = {464747a5-2dff-40de-99d3-45c33921bb9e},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.; Background: The wide variety of dissemination and implementation designs now being used to evaluate and improve health systems and outcomes warrants review of the scope, features, and limitations of these designs. Methods: This paper is one product of a design workgroup formed in 2013 by the National Institutes of Health to address dissemination and implementation research, and whose members represented diverse methodologic backgrounds, content focus areas, and health sectors. These experts integrated their collective knowledge on dissemination and implementation designs with searches of published evaluations strategies. Results: This paper emphasizes randomized and non-randomized designs for the traditional translational research continuum or pipeline, which builds on existing efficacy and effectiveness trials to examine how one or more evidence-based clinical/prevention interventions are adopted, scaled up, and sustained in community or service delivery systems. We also mention other designs, including hybrid designs that combine effectiveness and implementation research, quality improvement designs for local knowledge, and designs that use simulation modeling. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Public Health Volume 38 is March 20, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/catalog/pubdates.aspx for revised estimates.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Brown, C H and Curran, Geoffrey and Palinkas, Lawrence A and Aarons, Gregory A and Wells, Kenneth B and Jones, Loretta and Collins, Linda M and Duan, Naihua and Mittman, Brian S and Wallace, Andrea and Tabak, Rachel G and Ducharme, Lori and Chambers, David and Neta, Gila and Wiley, Tisha and Landsverk, John and Cheung, Ken and Cruden, Gracelyn},\n journal = {Annual Review of Public Health}\n}","author_short":["Brown, C., H.","Curran, G.","Palinkas, L., A.","Aarons, G., A.","Wells, K., B.","Jones, L.","Collins, L., M.","Duan, N.","Mittman, B., S.","Wallace, A.","Tabak, R., G.","Ducharme, L.","Chambers, D.","Neta, G.","Wiley, T.","Landsverk, J.","Cheung, K.","Cruden, G."],"urls":{"Website":"http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044215"},"bibbaseid":"brown-curran-palinkas-aarons-wells-jones-collins-duan-etal-anoverviewofresearchandevaluationdesignsfordisseminationandimplementation-2017","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["overview","research","evaluation","designs","dissemination","implementation","brown","curran","palinkas","aarons","wells","jones","collins","duan","mittman","wallace","tabak","ducharme","chambers","neta","wiley","landsverk","cheung","cruden"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}