Funding Relations between Nonprofits and Government: A Positive Example. Brown, L. K. & Troutt, E. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1):5–27, March, 2004. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc
Paper doi abstract bibtex This article examines the attributes of a successful contracting model for the financing and support of nonprofit organizations. It describes how, through government initiative, a program can be built in which transaction costs are minimized through a cooperative approach to contracting based on mutual trust. It shows how investment in a long-term, trust-based, cooperative relationship underlined by professional standards and a continuous focus on a common mission by all levels of actors within and without government can provide the impetus for a system in which high standards of service are maintained, accountability is organic, and organizations feel supported in their mission but not controlled. The example presented is a provincial government program for the prevention of family violence in Manitoba, Canada, but the features that make it successful can be applied widely.
@article{brown_funding_2004,
title = {Funding {Relations} between {Nonprofits} and {Government}: {A} {Positive} {Example}},
volume = {33},
issn = {0899-7640},
shorttitle = {Funding {Relations} between {Nonprofits} and {Government}},
url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764003260601},
doi = {10.1177/0899764003260601},
abstract = {This article examines the attributes of a successful contracting model for the financing and support of nonprofit organizations. It describes how, through government initiative, a program can be built in which transaction costs are minimized through a cooperative approach to contracting based on mutual trust. It shows how investment in a long-term, trust-based, cooperative relationship underlined by professional standards and a continuous focus on a common mission by all levels of actors within and without government can provide the impetus for a system in which high standards of service are maintained, accountability is organic, and organizations feel supported in their mission but not controlled. The example presented is a provincial government program for the prevention of family violence in Manitoba, Canada, but the features that make it successful can be applied widely.},
number = {1},
urldate = {2025-03-15},
journal = {Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly},
author = {Brown, Laura K. and Troutt, Elizabeth},
month = mar,
year = {2004},
note = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},
keywords = {collaboration, economic (indicator), interviews (method), non-profit, qualitative (method), trust-based, trust-based environments (indicator), trust-based funding (indicator)},
pages = {5--27},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"SKvDaZJjQdNQZMcSD","bibbaseid":"brown-troutt-fundingrelationsbetweennonprofitsandgovernmentapositiveexample-2004","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:30.093Z","title":"Funding Relations between Nonprofits and Government: A Positive Example","author_short":["Brown, L. K.","Troutt, E."],"year":2004,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/jermainewill16/3867701","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Funding Relations between Nonprofits and Government: A Positive Example","volume":"33","issn":"0899-7640","shorttitle":"Funding Relations between Nonprofits and Government","url":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764003260601","doi":"10.1177/0899764003260601","abstract":"This article examines the attributes of a successful contracting model for the financing and support of nonprofit organizations. It describes how, through government initiative, a program can be built in which transaction costs are minimized through a cooperative approach to contracting based on mutual trust. It shows how investment in a long-term, trust-based, cooperative relationship underlined by professional standards and a continuous focus on a common mission by all levels of actors within and without government can provide the impetus for a system in which high standards of service are maintained, accountability is organic, and organizations feel supported in their mission but not controlled. The example presented is a provincial government program for the prevention of family violence in Manitoba, Canada, but the features that make it successful can be applied widely.","number":"1","urldate":"2025-03-15","journal":"Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Brown"],"firstnames":["Laura","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Troutt"],"firstnames":["Elizabeth"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2004","note":"Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc","keywords":"collaboration, economic (indicator), interviews (method), non-profit, qualitative (method), trust-based, trust-based environments (indicator), trust-based funding (indicator)","pages":"5–27","bibtex":"@article{brown_funding_2004,\n\ttitle = {Funding {Relations} between {Nonprofits} and {Government}: {A} {Positive} {Example}},\n\tvolume = {33},\n\tissn = {0899-7640},\n\tshorttitle = {Funding {Relations} between {Nonprofits} and {Government}},\n\turl = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764003260601},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/0899764003260601},\n\tabstract = {This article examines the attributes of a successful contracting model for the financing and support of nonprofit organizations. It describes how, through government initiative, a program can be built in which transaction costs are minimized through a cooperative approach to contracting based on mutual trust. It shows how investment in a long-term, trust-based, cooperative relationship underlined by professional standards and a continuous focus on a common mission by all levels of actors within and without government can provide the impetus for a system in which high standards of service are maintained, accountability is organic, and organizations feel supported in their mission but not controlled. The example presented is a provincial government program for the prevention of family violence in Manitoba, Canada, but the features that make it successful can be applied widely.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-03-15},\n\tjournal = {Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly},\n\tauthor = {Brown, Laura K. and Troutt, Elizabeth},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2004},\n\tnote = {Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc},\n\tkeywords = {collaboration, economic (indicator), interviews (method), non-profit, qualitative (method), trust-based, trust-based environments (indicator), trust-based funding (indicator)},\n\tpages = {5--27},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Brown, L. K.","Troutt, E."],"key":"brown_funding_2004","id":"brown_funding_2004","bibbaseid":"brown-troutt-fundingrelationsbetweennonprofitsandgovernmentapositiveexample-2004","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0899764003260601"},"keyword":["collaboration","economic (indicator)","interviews (method)","non-profit","qualitative (method)","trust-based","trust-based environments (indicator)","trust-based funding (indicator)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["funding","relations","between","nonprofits","government","positive","example","brown","troutt"],"keywords":["collaboration","economic (indicator)","interviews (method)","non-profit","qualitative (method)","trust-based","trust-based environments (indicator)","trust-based funding (indicator)"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh","cLM7smcFgu9CBiEmk","74nCuPpR2RAH637gk"]}