@article{buchanan_wicked_1992,
	title = {Wicked {Problems} in {Design} {Thinking}},
	volume = {2},
	issn = {1794-7111},
	abstract = {Only critical distancing let Godard value the premonitory potential of film, and at the same time, point out the incapacity to register the realness that it generated. The filmmaker has always believed that “film is prophetic, it predicts and announces things”, and that this condition corresponds to its essence as a record. Rancière in a lucid reading of Film History says that for Godard: “film is responsible for not filming fields in their time; great for filming them before their time and guilty for not knowing how to recognize them”. This article begins with these clear political propositions, as well as proposing some variations.},
	number = {8},
	journal = {Design Issues},
	author = {Buchanan, Richard},
	year = {1992},
	pages = {7--35},
}

{"_id":{"_str":"5342a6cf0e946d920a002cdb"},"__v":0,"authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Buchanan, R."],"bibbaseid":"buchanan-wickedproblemsindesignthinking-1992","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Wicked Problems in Design Thinking","volume":"2","issn":"1794-7111","abstract":"Only critical distancing let Godard value the premonitory potential of film, and at the same time, point out the incapacity to register the realness that it generated. The filmmaker has always believed that “film is prophetic, it predicts and announces things”, and that this condition corresponds to its essence as a record. Rancière in a lucid reading of Film History says that for Godard: “film is responsible for not filming fields in their time; great for filming them before their time and guilty for not knowing how to recognize them”. This article begins with these clear political propositions, as well as proposing some variations.","number":"8","journal":"Design Issues","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Buchanan"],"firstnames":["Richard"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1992","pages":"7–35","bibtex":"@article{buchanan_wicked_1992,\n\ttitle = {Wicked {Problems} in {Design} {Thinking}},\n\tvolume = {2},\n\tissn = {1794-7111},\n\tabstract = {Only critical distancing let Godard value the premonitory potential of film, and at the same time, point out the incapacity to register the realness that it generated. The filmmaker has always believed that “film is prophetic, it predicts and announces things”, and that this condition corresponds to its essence as a record. Rancière in a lucid reading of Film History says that for Godard: “film is responsible for not filming fields in their time; great for filming them before their time and guilty for not knowing how to recognize them”. This article begins with these clear political propositions, as well as proposing some variations.},\n\tnumber = {8},\n\tjournal = {Design Issues},\n\tauthor = {Buchanan, Richard},\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tpages = {7--35},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Buchanan, R."],"key":"buchanan_wicked_1992","id":"buchanan_wicked_1992","bibbaseid":"buchanan-wickedproblemsindesignthinking-1992","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/stanislavroudavski","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["wicked","problems","design","thinking","buchanan"],"title":"Wicked Problems in Design Thinking","year":1992,"dataSources":["PQ6Ej4g4DcoEcPKBY","df8amcRT5r387YYHM","n2DaqhGw6tmakfok5","xKHaKpiptpp4NzKsj"]}