Hedging its Bets: The UK and the Politics of European Financial Services Regulation. Buller, J. & Lindstrom, N. New Political Economy. ![Hedging its Bets: The UK and the Politics of European Financial Services Regulation [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Some argue that European financial services regulation is witnessing a shift from a ‘market-making’ to a ‘market-shaping’ paradigm after the global financial crisis. This so-called ‘new’ political economy explanation stresses the role of ideas to understand this change. We consider this claim by providing an in-depth examination of recent European hedge fund legislation from the perspective of two key ‘market-making’ coalition members: the UK government and the hedge fund industry. We accept that the legislation represents a set-back for the ‘market-makers’ but question whether it represents a victory for the ‘market-shapers’. Moreover, we cast doubt on the causal role of ideas, calling for a domestic politics approach.
@article{buller_hedging_????,
title = {Hedging its {Bets}: {The} {UK} and the {Politics} of {European} {Financial} {Services} {Regulation}},
issn = {1356-3467},
shorttitle = {Hedging its {Bets}},
url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2012.700924},
doi = {10.1080/13563467.2012.700924},
abstract = {Some argue that European financial services regulation is witnessing a shift from a ‘market-making’ to a ‘market-shaping’ paradigm after the global financial crisis. This so-called ‘new’ political economy explanation stresses the role of ideas to understand this change. We consider this claim by providing an in-depth examination of recent European hedge fund legislation from the perspective of two key ‘market-making’ coalition members: the UK government and the hedge fund industry. We accept that the legislation represents a set-back for the ‘market-makers’ but question whether it represents a victory for the ‘market-shapers’. Moreover, we cast doubt on the causal role of ideas, calling for a domestic politics approach.},
urldate = {2012-07-25},
journal = {New Political Economy},
author = {Buller, Jim and Lindstrom, Nicole},
pages = {1--19},
file = {13563467.2012.700924.pdf:files/36837/13563467.2012.700924.pdf:application/pdf}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"YaT7CTLDHMrGg9KwQ","bibbaseid":"buller-lindstrom-hedgingitsbetstheukandthepoliticsofeuropeanfinancialservicesregulation","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:31.004Z","title":"Hedging its Bets: The UK and the Politics of European Financial Services Regulation","author_short":["Buller, J.","Lindstrom, N."],"year":null,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Hedging its Bets: The UK and the Politics of European Financial Services Regulation","issn":"1356-3467","shorttitle":"Hedging its Bets","url":"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2012.700924","doi":"10.1080/13563467.2012.700924","abstract":"Some argue that European financial services regulation is witnessing a shift from a ‘market-making’ to a ‘market-shaping’ paradigm after the global financial crisis. This so-called ‘new’ political economy explanation stresses the role of ideas to understand this change. We consider this claim by providing an in-depth examination of recent European hedge fund legislation from the perspective of two key ‘market-making’ coalition members: the UK government and the hedge fund industry. We accept that the legislation represents a set-back for the ‘market-makers’ but question whether it represents a victory for the ‘market-shapers’. Moreover, we cast doubt on the causal role of ideas, calling for a domestic politics approach.","urldate":"2012-07-25","journal":"New Political Economy","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Buller"],"firstnames":["Jim"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lindstrom"],"firstnames":["Nicole"],"suffixes":[]}],"pages":"1--19","file":"13563467.2012.700924.pdf:files/36837/13563467.2012.700924.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{buller_hedging_????,\n\ttitle = {Hedging its {Bets}: {The} {UK} and the {Politics} of {European} {Financial} {Services} {Regulation}},\n\tissn = {1356-3467},\n\tshorttitle = {Hedging its {Bets}},\n\turl = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2012.700924},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/13563467.2012.700924},\n\tabstract = {Some argue that European financial services regulation is witnessing a shift from a ‘market-making’ to a ‘market-shaping’ paradigm after the global financial crisis. This so-called ‘new’ political economy explanation stresses the role of ideas to understand this change. We consider this claim by providing an in-depth examination of recent European hedge fund legislation from the perspective of two key ‘market-making’ coalition members: the UK government and the hedge fund industry. We accept that the legislation represents a set-back for the ‘market-makers’ but question whether it represents a victory for the ‘market-shapers’. Moreover, we cast doubt on the causal role of ideas, calling for a domestic politics approach.},\n\turldate = {2012-07-25},\n\tjournal = {New Political Economy},\n\tauthor = {Buller, Jim and Lindstrom, Nicole},\n\tpages = {1--19},\n\tfile = {13563467.2012.700924.pdf:files/36837/13563467.2012.700924.pdf:application/pdf}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Buller, J.","Lindstrom, N."],"key":"buller_hedging_????","id":"buller_hedging_????","bibbaseid":"buller-lindstrom-hedgingitsbetstheukandthepoliticsofeuropeanfinancialservicesregulation","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2012.700924"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["hedging","bets","politics","european","financial","services","regulation","buller","lindstrom"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}