Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity. Byars-Winston, A. & Rogers, J. G. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1):30–44, 2019. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Associationdoi abstract bibtex Using social–cognitive career theory, we identified the experiential sources of learning that contribute to research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity for culturally diverse undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (i.e., STEM) majors. We examined group differences by race/ethnicity and gender to investigate potential cultural variations in a model to explain students’ research career intentions. Using a sample of 688 undergraduate students, we ran a series of path models testing the relationships between the experiential sources, research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity to research career intentions. Findings were largely consistent with our hypotheses in that research self-efficacy and outcome expectancies were directly and positively associated with research career intentions and the associations of the experiential sources to intentions were mediated via self-efficacy. Science identity contributed significant though modest variance to research career intentions indirectly via its positive association with outcome expectations. Science identity also partially mediated the efficacy-outcome expectancies path. The experiential sources of learning were associated in expected directions to research self-efficacy with 3 of the sources emerging as significantly correlated with science identity. An unexpected direct relationship from vicarious learning to intentions was observed. In testing for group differences by race/ethnicity and gender in subsamples of Black/African American and Latino/a students, we found that the hypothesized model incorporating science identity was supported, and most paths did not vary significantly across four Race/Ethnicity × Gender groups, except for 3 paths. Research and practice implications of the findings for supporting research career intentions of culturally diverse undergraduate students are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
@article{byars-winston_testing_2019,
title = {Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity.},
volume = {66},
issn = {1939-2168(Electronic),0022-0167(Print)},
doi = {10.1037/cou0000309},
abstract = {Using social–cognitive career theory, we identified the experiential sources of learning that contribute to research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity for culturally diverse undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (i.e., STEM) majors. We examined group differences by race/ethnicity and gender to investigate potential cultural variations in a model to explain students’ research career intentions. Using a sample of 688 undergraduate students, we ran a series of path models testing the relationships between the experiential sources, research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity to research career intentions. Findings were largely consistent with our hypotheses in that research self-efficacy and outcome expectancies were directly and positively associated with research career intentions and the associations of the experiential sources to intentions were mediated via self-efficacy. Science identity contributed significant though modest variance to research career intentions indirectly via its positive association with outcome expectations. Science identity also partially mediated the efficacy-outcome expectancies path. The experiential sources of learning were associated in expected directions to research self-efficacy with 3 of the sources emerging as significantly correlated with science identity. An unexpected direct relationship from vicarious learning to intentions was observed. In testing for group differences by race/ethnicity and gender in subsamples of Black/African American and Latino/a students, we found that the hypothesized model incorporating science identity was supported, and most paths did not vary significantly across four Race/Ethnicity × Gender groups, except for 3 paths. Research and practice implications of the findings for supporting research career intentions of culturally diverse undergraduate students are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)},
number = {1},
journal = {Journal of Counseling Psychology},
author = {Byars-Winston, Angela and Rogers, Jenna Griebel},
year = {2019},
note = {Place: US
Publisher: American Psychological Association},
keywords = {*Human Sex Differences, *Occupational Aspirations, *Racial and Ethnic Differences, *Science Education, *Self-Efficacy, College Students, Intention, Intersectionality, STEM, Social Cognition, Student Attitudes, Test Construction, Undergraduate Education},
pages = {30--44},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"kwxRQnqDA634Ssp9n","bibbaseid":"byarswinston-rogers-testingintersectionalityofraceethnicitygenderinasocialcognitivecareertheorymodelwithscienceidentity-2019","author_short":["Byars-Winston, A.","Rogers, J. G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity.","volume":"66","issn":"1939-2168(Electronic),0022-0167(Print)","doi":"10.1037/cou0000309","abstract":"Using social–cognitive career theory, we identified the experiential sources of learning that contribute to research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity for culturally diverse undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (i.e., STEM) majors. We examined group differences by race/ethnicity and gender to investigate potential cultural variations in a model to explain students’ research career intentions. Using a sample of 688 undergraduate students, we ran a series of path models testing the relationships between the experiential sources, research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity to research career intentions. Findings were largely consistent with our hypotheses in that research self-efficacy and outcome expectancies were directly and positively associated with research career intentions and the associations of the experiential sources to intentions were mediated via self-efficacy. Science identity contributed significant though modest variance to research career intentions indirectly via its positive association with outcome expectations. Science identity also partially mediated the efficacy-outcome expectancies path. The experiential sources of learning were associated in expected directions to research self-efficacy with 3 of the sources emerging as significantly correlated with science identity. An unexpected direct relationship from vicarious learning to intentions was observed. In testing for group differences by race/ethnicity and gender in subsamples of Black/African American and Latino/a students, we found that the hypothesized model incorporating science identity was supported, and most paths did not vary significantly across four Race/Ethnicity × Gender groups, except for 3 paths. Research and practice implications of the findings for supporting research career intentions of culturally diverse undergraduate students are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)","number":"1","journal":"Journal of Counseling Psychology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Byars-Winston"],"firstnames":["Angela"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rogers"],"firstnames":["Jenna","Griebel"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2019","note":"Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association","keywords":"*Human Sex Differences, *Occupational Aspirations, *Racial and Ethnic Differences, *Science Education, *Self-Efficacy, College Students, Intention, Intersectionality, STEM, Social Cognition, Student Attitudes, Test Construction, Undergraduate Education","pages":"30–44","bibtex":"@article{byars-winston_testing_2019,\n\ttitle = {Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity.},\n\tvolume = {66},\n\tissn = {1939-2168(Electronic),0022-0167(Print)},\n\tdoi = {10.1037/cou0000309},\n\tabstract = {Using social–cognitive career theory, we identified the experiential sources of learning that contribute to research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity for culturally diverse undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and math (i.e., STEM) majors. We examined group differences by race/ethnicity and gender to investigate potential cultural variations in a model to explain students’ research career intentions. Using a sample of 688 undergraduate students, we ran a series of path models testing the relationships between the experiential sources, research self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and science identity to research career intentions. Findings were largely consistent with our hypotheses in that research self-efficacy and outcome expectancies were directly and positively associated with research career intentions and the associations of the experiential sources to intentions were mediated via self-efficacy. Science identity contributed significant though modest variance to research career intentions indirectly via its positive association with outcome expectations. Science identity also partially mediated the efficacy-outcome expectancies path. The experiential sources of learning were associated in expected directions to research self-efficacy with 3 of the sources emerging as significantly correlated with science identity. An unexpected direct relationship from vicarious learning to intentions was observed. In testing for group differences by race/ethnicity and gender in subsamples of Black/African American and Latino/a students, we found that the hypothesized model incorporating science identity was supported, and most paths did not vary significantly across four Race/Ethnicity × Gender groups, except for 3 paths. Research and practice implications of the findings for supporting research career intentions of culturally diverse undergraduate students are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Counseling Psychology},\n\tauthor = {Byars-Winston, Angela and Rogers, Jenna Griebel},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {Place: US\nPublisher: American Psychological Association},\n\tkeywords = {*Human Sex Differences, *Occupational Aspirations, *Racial and Ethnic Differences, *Science Education, *Self-Efficacy, College Students, Intention, Intersectionality, STEM, Social Cognition, Student Attitudes, Test Construction, Undergraduate Education},\n\tpages = {30--44},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Byars-Winston, A.","Rogers, J. G."],"key":"byars-winston_testing_2019-1","id":"byars-winston_testing_2019-1","bibbaseid":"byarswinston-rogers-testingintersectionalityofraceethnicitygenderinasocialcognitivecareertheorymodelwithscienceidentity-2019","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["*Human Sex Differences","*Occupational Aspirations","*Racial and Ethnic Differences","*Science Education","*Self-Efficacy","College Students","Intention","Intersectionality","STEM","Social Cognition","Student Attitudes","Test Construction","Undergraduate Education"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mentoring","dataSources":["Xs558R4fESZd8FQs6"],"keywords":["*human sex differences","*occupational aspirations","*racial and ethnic differences","*science education","*self-efficacy","college students","intention","intersectionality","stem","social cognition","student attitudes","test construction","undergraduate education"],"search_terms":["testing","intersectionality","race","ethnicity","gender","social","cognitive","career","theory","model","science","identity","byars-winston","rogers"],"title":"Testing intersectionality of race/ethnicity × gender in a social–cognitive career theory model with science identity.","year":2019}