Teaching for Intellectual Virtue in Logic and Critical Thinking Classes: Why and How. Byerly, T. R. Teaching Philosophy, 42(1):1–27, March, 2019. doi abstract bibtex Introductory-level undergraduate classes in Logic or Critical Thinking are a staple in the portfolio of many Philosophy programs. A standard approach to these classes is to include teaching and learning activities focused on formal deductive and inductive logic, sometimes accompanied by teaching and learning activities focused on informal fallacies or argument construction. In this article, I discuss a proposal to include an additional element within these classes—namely, teaching and learning activities focused on intellectual virtues. After clarifying the proposal, I identify three reasons in favor of implementing it and I discuss how to implement it, focusing on questions about pedagogical strategies and pedagogical resources.
@article{byerly_teaching_2019,
title = {Teaching for {Intellectual} {Virtue} in {Logic} and {Critical} {Thinking} {Classes}: {Why} and {How}},
volume = {42},
issn = {01455788},
shorttitle = {Teaching for {Intellectual} {Virtue} in {Logic} and {Critical} {Thinking} {Classes}},
doi = {10.5840/teachphil201911599},
abstract = {Introductory-level undergraduate classes in Logic or Critical Thinking are a staple in the portfolio of many Philosophy programs. A standard approach to these classes is to include teaching and learning activities focused on formal deductive and inductive logic, sometimes accompanied by teaching and learning activities focused on informal fallacies or argument construction. In this article, I discuss a proposal to include an additional element within these classes—namely, teaching and learning activities focused on intellectual virtues. After clarifying the proposal, I identify three reasons in favor of implementing it and I discuss how to implement it, focusing on questions about pedagogical strategies and pedagogical resources.},
number = {1},
journal = {Teaching Philosophy},
author = {Byerly, T. Ryan},
month = mar,
year = {2019},
keywords = {Critical thinking, Educational programs, Induction (Logic), Philosophy education, Undergraduates},
pages = {1--27},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"mGzqFXKJfCfHB72wf","bibbaseid":"byerly-teachingforintellectualvirtueinlogicandcriticalthinkingclasseswhyandhow-2019","author_short":["Byerly, T. R."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Teaching for Intellectual Virtue in Logic and Critical Thinking Classes: Why and How","volume":"42","issn":"01455788","shorttitle":"Teaching for Intellectual Virtue in Logic and Critical Thinking Classes","doi":"10.5840/teachphil201911599","abstract":"Introductory-level undergraduate classes in Logic or Critical Thinking are a staple in the portfolio of many Philosophy programs. A standard approach to these classes is to include teaching and learning activities focused on formal deductive and inductive logic, sometimes accompanied by teaching and learning activities focused on informal fallacies or argument construction. In this article, I discuss a proposal to include an additional element within these classes—namely, teaching and learning activities focused on intellectual virtues. After clarifying the proposal, I identify three reasons in favor of implementing it and I discuss how to implement it, focusing on questions about pedagogical strategies and pedagogical resources.","number":"1","journal":"Teaching Philosophy","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Byerly"],"firstnames":["T.","Ryan"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2019","keywords":"Critical thinking, Educational programs, Induction (Logic), Philosophy education, Undergraduates","pages":"1–27","bibtex":"@article{byerly_teaching_2019,\n\ttitle = {Teaching for {Intellectual} {Virtue} in {Logic} and {Critical} {Thinking} {Classes}: {Why} and {How}},\n\tvolume = {42},\n\tissn = {01455788},\n\tshorttitle = {Teaching for {Intellectual} {Virtue} in {Logic} and {Critical} {Thinking} {Classes}},\n\tdoi = {10.5840/teachphil201911599},\n\tabstract = {Introductory-level undergraduate classes in Logic or Critical Thinking are a staple in the portfolio of many Philosophy programs. A standard approach to these classes is to include teaching and learning activities focused on formal deductive and inductive logic, sometimes accompanied by teaching and learning activities focused on informal fallacies or argument construction. In this article, I discuss a proposal to include an additional element within these classes—namely, teaching and learning activities focused on intellectual virtues. After clarifying the proposal, I identify three reasons in favor of implementing it and I discuss how to implement it, focusing on questions about pedagogical strategies and pedagogical resources.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Teaching Philosophy},\n\tauthor = {Byerly, T. Ryan},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tkeywords = {Critical thinking, Educational programs, Induction (Logic), Philosophy education, Undergraduates},\n\tpages = {1--27},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Byerly, T. R."],"key":"byerly_teaching_2019","id":"byerly_teaching_2019","bibbaseid":"byerly-teachingforintellectualvirtueinlogicandcriticalthinkingclasseswhyandhow-2019","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Critical thinking","Educational programs","Induction (Logic)","Philosophy education","Undergraduates"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/michaelschwartzlib","dataSources":["8R4GsMCvNb3iikNz7"],"keywords":["critical thinking","educational programs","induction (logic)","philosophy education","undergraduates"],"search_terms":["teaching","intellectual","virtue","logic","critical","thinking","classes","byerly"],"title":"Teaching for Intellectual Virtue in Logic and Critical Thinking Classes: Why and How","year":2019}