Underdetermination, realism, and truth approximation. Cevolani, G. & Tambolo, L. In Vidal, C. M., Falguera, J. L., Sagüillo, J. M., Verdejo, V., & Pereira-Fariña, M., editors, VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pages 374-381, Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 2012. USC Press.
Underdetermination, realism, and truth approximation [pdf]Paper  abstract   bibtex   6 downloads  
Held (2011) attacks scientific realism via a criticism of the No-Miracles Argument based on the underdetermination of theories. In this paper we argue that the No-Miracles Argument, when deployed in conjunction with non-naive versions of realism, based on the view that verisimilitude or truth approximation is the main cognitive aim of scientific inquiry, survives Held's criticism unscathed.

Downloads: 6