Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in Tennessee Eastman process. Chadha, G. S. & Schwung, A. In 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), pages 1–8, September, 2017. ISSN: 1946-0759doi abstract bibtex Process monitoring and fault diagnosis methods are used to detect abnormal events in industrial processes. Process breakdowns hinder the overall productivity of the system which makes the early detection of faults very critical. Due to the highly non-linear nature of modern industrial processes, deep neural networks with several layers of non-linear complex representations fit aptly for contemporary fault diagnosis. Although deep neural networks have found wide array of application areas such as image recognition and speech recognition, their effectiveness in fault detection has not been tested substantially. In this study, a comparison between two deep neural network architectures, namely Deep Stacking Networks and Sparse Stacked Autoencoders for fault detection from process data is presented. The Tennessee Eastman benchmark process is considered to test the effectiveness of these deep architectures. A detailed comparison between the two architectures is illustrated with different hyperparameters. The experiment results show that the Sparse Stacked Autoencoders model has superior average fault detection capability and is also more stable as it has less variation in fault detection rate.
@inproceedings{chadha_comparison_2017,
title = {Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in {Tennessee} {Eastman} process},
doi = {10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247619},
abstract = {Process monitoring and fault diagnosis methods are used to detect abnormal events in industrial processes. Process breakdowns hinder the overall productivity of the system which makes the early detection of faults very critical. Due to the highly non-linear nature of modern industrial processes, deep neural networks with several layers of non-linear complex representations fit aptly for contemporary fault diagnosis. Although deep neural networks have found wide array of application areas such as image recognition and speech recognition, their effectiveness in fault detection has not been tested substantially. In this study, a comparison between two deep neural network architectures, namely Deep Stacking Networks and Sparse Stacked Autoencoders for fault detection from process data is presented. The Tennessee Eastman benchmark process is considered to test the effectiveness of these deep architectures. A detailed comparison between the two architectures is illustrated with different hyperparameters. The experiment results show that the Sparse Stacked Autoencoders model has superior average fault detection capability and is also more stable as it has less variation in fault detection rate.},
booktitle = {2017 22nd {IEEE} {International} {Conference} on {Emerging} {Technologies} and {Factory} {Automation} ({ETFA})},
author = {Chadha, Gavneet Singh and Schwung, Andreas},
month = sep,
year = {2017},
note = {ISSN: 1946-0759},
keywords = {Deep Neural Networks, Deep stacking network, Fault detection, Fault diagnosis, Mathematical model, Monitoring, Neural networks, Process monitoring, Stacked Autoencoders, Stacking, Tennessee Eastman Process, Training},
pages = {1--8},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"6Mfy2kvWRAxSYsa52","bibbaseid":"chadha-schwung-comparisonofdeepneuralnetworkarchitecturesforfaultdetectionintennesseeeastmanprocess-2017","author_short":["Chadha, G. S.","Schwung, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"inproceedings","type":"inproceedings","title":"Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in Tennessee Eastman process","doi":"10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247619","abstract":"Process monitoring and fault diagnosis methods are used to detect abnormal events in industrial processes. Process breakdowns hinder the overall productivity of the system which makes the early detection of faults very critical. Due to the highly non-linear nature of modern industrial processes, deep neural networks with several layers of non-linear complex representations fit aptly for contemporary fault diagnosis. Although deep neural networks have found wide array of application areas such as image recognition and speech recognition, their effectiveness in fault detection has not been tested substantially. In this study, a comparison between two deep neural network architectures, namely Deep Stacking Networks and Sparse Stacked Autoencoders for fault detection from process data is presented. The Tennessee Eastman benchmark process is considered to test the effectiveness of these deep architectures. A detailed comparison between the two architectures is illustrated with different hyperparameters. The experiment results show that the Sparse Stacked Autoencoders model has superior average fault detection capability and is also more stable as it has less variation in fault detection rate.","booktitle":"2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chadha"],"firstnames":["Gavneet","Singh"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schwung"],"firstnames":["Andreas"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"September","year":"2017","note":"ISSN: 1946-0759","keywords":"Deep Neural Networks, Deep stacking network, Fault detection, Fault diagnosis, Mathematical model, Monitoring, Neural networks, Process monitoring, Stacked Autoencoders, Stacking, Tennessee Eastman Process, Training","pages":"1–8","bibtex":"@inproceedings{chadha_comparison_2017,\n\ttitle = {Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in {Tennessee} {Eastman} process},\n\tdoi = {10.1109/ETFA.2017.8247619},\n\tabstract = {Process monitoring and fault diagnosis methods are used to detect abnormal events in industrial processes. Process breakdowns hinder the overall productivity of the system which makes the early detection of faults very critical. Due to the highly non-linear nature of modern industrial processes, deep neural networks with several layers of non-linear complex representations fit aptly for contemporary fault diagnosis. Although deep neural networks have found wide array of application areas such as image recognition and speech recognition, their effectiveness in fault detection has not been tested substantially. In this study, a comparison between two deep neural network architectures, namely Deep Stacking Networks and Sparse Stacked Autoencoders for fault detection from process data is presented. The Tennessee Eastman benchmark process is considered to test the effectiveness of these deep architectures. A detailed comparison between the two architectures is illustrated with different hyperparameters. The experiment results show that the Sparse Stacked Autoencoders model has superior average fault detection capability and is also more stable as it has less variation in fault detection rate.},\n\tbooktitle = {2017 22nd {IEEE} {International} {Conference} on {Emerging} {Technologies} and {Factory} {Automation} ({ETFA})},\n\tauthor = {Chadha, Gavneet Singh and Schwung, Andreas},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tnote = {ISSN: 1946-0759},\n\tkeywords = {Deep Neural Networks, Deep stacking network, Fault detection, Fault diagnosis, Mathematical model, Monitoring, Neural networks, Process monitoring, Stacked Autoencoders, Stacking, Tennessee Eastman Process, Training},\n\tpages = {1--8},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Chadha, G. S.","Schwung, A."],"key":"chadha_comparison_2017","id":"chadha_comparison_2017","bibbaseid":"chadha-schwung-comparisonofdeepneuralnetworkarchitecturesforfaultdetectionintennesseeeastmanprocess-2017","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Deep Neural Networks","Deep stacking network","Fault detection","Fault diagnosis","Mathematical model","Monitoring","Neural networks","Process monitoring","Stacked Autoencoders","Stacking","Tennessee Eastman Process","Training"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"inproceedings","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mh_lenguyen","dataSources":["iwKepCrWBps7ojhDx"],"keywords":["deep neural networks","deep stacking network","fault detection","fault diagnosis","mathematical model","monitoring","neural networks","process monitoring","stacked autoencoders","stacking","tennessee eastman process","training"],"search_terms":["comparison","deep","neural","network","architectures","fault","detection","tennessee","eastman","process","chadha","schwung"],"title":"Comparison of deep neural network architectures for fault detection in Tennessee Eastman process","year":2017}