@article{Chakraborty2021,
abstract = {A collective understanding that traces a debate between ‘what is science?' and ‘what is a science about?' has an extraction to the notion of scientific knowledge. The debate undertakes the pursuit of science that hardly extravagance the dogma of pseudo-science. Scientific conjectures invoke science as an intellectual activity poured by experiences and repetition of the objects that look independent of any idealist views (believes in the consensus of mind-dependence reality). The realistic machinery employs in an empiricist exposition of the objective phenomenon by synchronizing the general method to make observational predictions that cover all the phenomena of the particular entity without any exception. The formation of science encloses several epistemological purviews and a succession of conjectures cum refutation that a newer theorem could reinstate. My attempt is to advocate a holistic plea of scientific conjectures that outruns the restricted regulation of experience or testable hypothesis to render the validity of a chain of logical reasoning (deductive or inductive) of basic scientific statements. The milieu of scientific intensification integrates speculation that loads efficiency towards a new experimental dimension where the reality is not itself objective or observers relative; in fact the observed phenomenon divulges in the constructive progression of preferred methods of falsifiability and uncertainty.},
author = {Chakraborty, Sanjit},
doi = {10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z},
issn = {0970-7794},
journal = {Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research},
keywords = {Falsifiability,Hilary Putnam,Hypothetico-deductivism,Inductive probabilities,Karl Popper,Test and refutation},
month = {jan},
number = {1},
pages = {83--101},
title = {{Scientific Conjectures and the Growth of Knowledge}},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z},
volume = {38},
year = {2021}
}

{"_id":"hvYmmzmSY44rXPXnS","bibbaseid":"chakraborty-scientificconjecturesandthegrowthofknowledge-2021","author_short":["Chakraborty, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"A collective understanding that traces a debate between ‘what is science?' and ‘what is a science about?' has an extraction to the notion of scientific knowledge. The debate undertakes the pursuit of science that hardly extravagance the dogma of pseudo-science. Scientific conjectures invoke science as an intellectual activity poured by experiences and repetition of the objects that look independent of any idealist views (believes in the consensus of mind-dependence reality). The realistic machinery employs in an empiricist exposition of the objective phenomenon by synchronizing the general method to make observational predictions that cover all the phenomena of the particular entity without any exception. The formation of science encloses several epistemological purviews and a succession of conjectures cum refutation that a newer theorem could reinstate. My attempt is to advocate a holistic plea of scientific conjectures that outruns the restricted regulation of experience or testable hypothesis to render the validity of a chain of logical reasoning (deductive or inductive) of basic scientific statements. The milieu of scientific intensification integrates speculation that loads efficiency towards a new experimental dimension where the reality is not itself objective or observers relative; in fact the observed phenomenon divulges in the constructive progression of preferred methods of falsifiability and uncertainty.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chakraborty"],"firstnames":["Sanjit"],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z","issn":"0970-7794","journal":"Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research","keywords":"Falsifiability,Hilary Putnam,Hypothetico-deductivism,Inductive probabilities,Karl Popper,Test and refutation","month":"jan","number":"1","pages":"83–101","title":"Scientific Conjectures and the Growth of Knowledge","url":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z","volume":"38","year":"2021","bibtex":"@article{Chakraborty2021,\nabstract = {A collective understanding that traces a debate between ‘what is science?' and ‘what is a science about?' has an extraction to the notion of scientific knowledge. The debate undertakes the pursuit of science that hardly extravagance the dogma of pseudo-science. Scientific conjectures invoke science as an intellectual activity poured by experiences and repetition of the objects that look independent of any idealist views (believes in the consensus of mind-dependence reality). The realistic machinery employs in an empiricist exposition of the objective phenomenon by synchronizing the general method to make observational predictions that cover all the phenomena of the particular entity without any exception. The formation of science encloses several epistemological purviews and a succession of conjectures cum refutation that a newer theorem could reinstate. My attempt is to advocate a holistic plea of scientific conjectures that outruns the restricted regulation of experience or testable hypothesis to render the validity of a chain of logical reasoning (deductive or inductive) of basic scientific statements. The milieu of scientific intensification integrates speculation that loads efficiency towards a new experimental dimension where the reality is not itself objective or observers relative; in fact the observed phenomenon divulges in the constructive progression of preferred methods of falsifiability and uncertainty.},\nauthor = {Chakraborty, Sanjit},\ndoi = {10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z},\nissn = {0970-7794},\njournal = {Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research},\nkeywords = {Falsifiability,Hilary Putnam,Hypothetico-deductivism,Inductive probabilities,Karl Popper,Test and refutation},\nmonth = {jan},\nnumber = {1},\npages = {83--101},\ntitle = {{Scientific Conjectures and the Growth of Knowledge}},\nurl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z},\nvolume = {38},\nyear = {2021}\n}\n","author_short":["Chakraborty, S."],"key":"Chakraborty2021","id":"Chakraborty2021","bibbaseid":"chakraborty-scientificconjecturesandthegrowthofknowledge-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40961-021-00231-z"},"keyword":["Falsifiability","Hilary Putnam","Hypothetico-deductivism","Inductive probabilities","Karl Popper","Test and refutation"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/ChjuT9PC4NJ7R6xJc","dataSources":["gpCKn4jBfpcFxtxyi"],"keywords":["falsifiability","hilary putnam","hypothetico-deductivism","inductive probabilities","karl popper","test and refutation"],"search_terms":["scientific","conjectures","growth","knowledge","chakraborty"],"title":"Scientific Conjectures and the Growth of Knowledge","year":2021}