Re-Mediating Research Ethics

Re-Mediating Research Ethics. Chee, F. M., Taylor, N. T., & de Castell, S. 32(6):497–506.

This article is a theoretical and empirical exploration of the meaning that accompanies contractual agreements, such as the End-User License Agreements (EULAs) that participants of online communities are required to sign as a condition of participation. As our study indicates, clicking ” I agree” on the often lengthy conditions presented during the installation and updating process typically permits third parties (including researchers) to monitor the digitally-mediated actions of users. Through our small-scale study in which we asked participants which terms of EULAs they would find agreeable, the majority confirmed that they simply clicked through the terms presented to them without much knowledge about the terms to which they were agreeing. From a research ethics standpoint, we reflect upon whether or not informed consent is achieved in these cases and pose a challenge to the academic research community to attend to the socio-technical shift from informed consent to a more nebulous concept of contractual agreement, online and offline.

@article{cheeReMediatingResearchEthics2012,
  title = {Re-{{Mediating Research Ethics}}},
  author = {Chee, Florence M. and Taylor, Nicholas T. and de Castell, Suzanne},
  date = {2012-12},
  journaltitle = {Bulletin of Science, Technology \& Society},
  volume = {32},
  pages = {497--506},
  issn = {1552-4183},
  doi = {10.1177/0270467612469074},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612469074},
  abstract = {This article is a theoretical and empirical exploration of the meaning that accompanies contractual agreements, such as the End-User License Agreements (EULAs) that participants of online communities are required to sign as a condition of participation. As our study indicates, clicking ” I agree” on the often lengthy conditions presented during the installation and updating process typically permits third parties (including researchers) to monitor the digitally-mediated actions of users. Through our small-scale study in which we asked participants which terms of EULAs they would find agreeable, the majority confirmed that they simply clicked through the terms presented to them without much knowledge about the terms to which they were agreeing. From a research ethics standpoint, we reflect upon whether or not informed consent is achieved in these cases and pose a challenge to the academic research community to attend to the socio-technical shift from informed consent to a more nebulous concept of contractual agreement, online and offline.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12141113,freedom,information-systems,science-ethics,web-and-information-technologies},
  number = {6},
  options = {useprefix=true}
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"256fTXwehQTZjwjfG","bibbaseid":"chee-taylor-decastell-remediatingresearchethics","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Chee, F. M.","Taylor, N. T.","de Castell, S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Re-Mediating Research Ethics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chee"],"firstnames":["Florence","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Taylor"],"firstnames":["Nicholas","T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["de"],"lastnames":["Castell"],"firstnames":["Suzanne"],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2012-12","journaltitle":"Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society","volume":"32","pages":"497–506","issn":"1552-4183","doi":"10.1177/0270467612469074","url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612469074","abstract":"This article is a theoretical and empirical exploration of the meaning that accompanies contractual agreements, such as the End-User License Agreements (EULAs) that participants of online communities are required to sign as a condition of participation. As our study indicates, clicking ” I agree” on the often lengthy conditions presented during the installation and updating process typically permits third parties (including researchers) to monitor the digitally-mediated actions of users. Through our small-scale study in which we asked participants which terms of EULAs they would find agreeable, the majority confirmed that they simply clicked through the terms presented to them without much knowledge about the terms to which they were agreeing. From a research ethics standpoint, we reflect upon whether or not informed consent is achieved in these cases and pose a challenge to the academic research community to attend to the socio-technical shift from informed consent to a more nebulous concept of contractual agreement, online and offline.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12141113,freedom,information-systems,science-ethics,web-and-information-technologies","number":"6","options":"useprefix=true","bibtex":"@article{cheeReMediatingResearchEthics2012,\n title = {Re-{{Mediating Research Ethics}}},\n author = {Chee, Florence M. and Taylor, Nicholas T. and de Castell, Suzanne},\n date = {2012-12},\n journaltitle = {Bulletin of Science, Technology \\& Society},\n volume = {32},\n pages = {497--506},\n issn = {1552-4183},\n doi = {10.1177/0270467612469074},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612469074},\n abstract = {This article is a theoretical and empirical exploration of the meaning that accompanies contractual agreements, such as the End-User License Agreements (EULAs) that participants of online communities are required to sign as a condition of participation. As our study indicates, clicking ” I agree” on the often lengthy conditions presented during the installation and updating process typically permits third parties (including researchers) to monitor the digitally-mediated actions of users. Through our small-scale study in which we asked participants which terms of EULAs they would find agreeable, the majority confirmed that they simply clicked through the terms presented to them without much knowledge about the terms to which they were agreeing. From a research ethics standpoint, we reflect upon whether or not informed consent is achieved in these cases and pose a challenge to the academic research community to attend to the socio-technical shift from informed consent to a more nebulous concept of contractual agreement, online and offline.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12141113,freedom,information-systems,science-ethics,web-and-information-technologies},\n number = {6},\n options = {useprefix=true}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Chee, F. M.","Taylor, N. T.","de Castell, S."],"key":"cheeReMediatingResearchEthics2012","id":"cheeReMediatingResearchEthics2012","bibbaseid":"chee-taylor-decastell-remediatingresearchethics","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612469074"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-12141113","freedom","information-systems","science-ethics","web-and-information-technologies"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:04.167Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-12141113","freedom","information-systems","science-ethics","web-and-information-technologies"],"search_terms":["mediating","research","ethics","chee","taylor","de castell"],"title":"Re-Mediating Research Ethics","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}