Differences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic in three countries. Chor, J. S., Pada, S. K., Stephenson, I., Goggins, W. B., Tambyah, P. A., Medina, M., Lee, N., Leung, T. F., Ngai, K. L., Law, S. K., Rainer, T. H., Griffiths, S., Chan, P. K., Chor, J. S. Y., Pada, S. K., Stephenson, I., Goggins, W. B., Tambyah, P. A., Medina, M., & Lee, N. Journal of Hospital Infection, 81(2):98–103, 2012.
Differences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic in three countries [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Background: In December 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued updated guidelines on the prevention of H1N1 influenza virus in healthcare settings. In 2010, the WHO pandemic influenza alert level was still at phase 6. Aim: To study the practice of infection control measures during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) in three countries. Methods: A standardized, self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted in 2010 among doctors, nurses and allied HCWs in 120 hospital-based clinical departments in Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK. Questions were asked on demographics; previous experience and perceived severity of influenza; infection control practices; uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination and H1N1 vaccination. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the independent association with different factors. Findings: A total of 2100 HCWs in the three countries participated. They reported high compliance (\textgreater80%) with infection control procedures regarded as standard for droplet-transmitted infections including wearing and changing gloves, and washing hands before and after patient contact. However, the reported use of masks with indirect or direct patient contact (surgical or N95 as required by their hospital) varied considerably (96.4% and 70.4% for Hong Kong; 82.3% and 87.7% for Singapore; 25.3% and 62.0% for the UK). Reported compliance was associated with job title, number of patient contacts and perceived severity of pandemics. There was no association between the uptake for seasonal or 2009 H1N1 vaccines and compliance. Conclusions: Compliance with infection control measures for pandemic influenza appears to vary widely depending on the setting.
@article{chor_differences_2012,
	title = {Differences in the compliance with hospital infection control practices during the 2009 influenza {H1N1} pandemic in three countries},
	volume = {81},
	issn = {0195-6701},
	url = {http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104454690&site=ehost-live},
	doi = {10.1016/j.jhin.2012.04.003},
	abstract = {Background: In December 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued updated guidelines on the prevention of H1N1 influenza virus in healthcare settings. In 2010, the WHO pandemic influenza alert level was still at phase 6. Aim: To study the practice of infection control measures during the 2009 influenza H1N1 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) in three countries. Methods: A standardized, self-administered anonymous questionnaire survey was conducted in 2010 among doctors, nurses and allied HCWs in 120 hospital-based clinical departments in Hong Kong, Singapore and the UK. Questions were asked on demographics; previous experience and perceived severity of influenza; infection control practices; uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination and H1N1 vaccination. Multiple logistic regression was used to test the independent association with different factors. Findings: A total of 2100 HCWs in the three countries participated. They reported high compliance ({\textgreater}80\%) with infection control procedures regarded as standard for droplet-transmitted infections including wearing and changing gloves, and washing hands before and after patient contact. However, the reported use of masks with indirect or direct patient contact (surgical or N95 as required by their hospital) varied considerably (96.4\% and 70.4\% for Hong Kong; 82.3\% and 87.7\% for Singapore; 25.3\% and 62.0\% for the UK). Reported compliance was associated with job title, number of patient contacts and perceived severity of pandemics. There was no association between the uptake for seasonal or 2009 H1N1 vaccines and compliance. Conclusions: Compliance with infection control measures for pandemic influenza appears to vary widely depending on the setting.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Journal of Hospital Infection},
	author = {Chor, J. S. and Pada, S. K. and Stephenson, I. and Goggins, W. B. and Tambyah, P. A. and Medina, M. and Lee, N. and Leung, T. F. and Ngai, K. L. and Law, S. K. and Rainer, T. H. and Griffiths, S. and Chan, P. K. and Chor, J. S. Y. and Pada, S. K. and Stephenson, I. and Goggins, W. B. and Tambyah, P. A. and Medina, M. and Lee, N.},
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Cross Infection -- Epidemiology, Cross Infection -- Prevention and Control, Cross Sectional Studies, Female, Great Britain, Guideline Adherence -- Statistics and Numerical Data, Hong Kong, Human, Infection Control -- Methods, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Influenza, Human, Influenza, Human -- Epidemiology, Influenza, Human -- Prevention and Control, Male, Middle Age, Questionnaires, Singapore},
	pages = {98--103},
}
Downloads: 0
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021