Dead Wood in European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica) Forest Reserves. Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E. P., Ódor, P., Standovár, T., Rozenbergar, D., Diaci, J., Wijdeven, S., Meyer, P., Winter, S., & Vrska, T. 210(1-3):267–282.
Dead Wood in European Beech (Fagus Sylvatica) Forest Reserves [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Data were analysed on the volume of dead wood in 86 beech forest reserves, covering most of the range of European beech forests. The mean volume was 130~m3/ha and the variation among reserves was high, ranging from almost nil to 550~m3/ha. The volume depended significantly on forest type, age since reserve establishment and volume of living wood. More dead wood was found in montane (rather than lowland/submontane) reserves, longer-established reserves (time since designation) and reserves with higher volumes of living wood. On average, fallen dead wood contributed more to the total dead wood volume than standing dead wood. The percentage of dead wood that was standing was almost twice as high in montane than in lowland/submontane forest reserves (45\,% versus 25%). The volume of dead wood at selected sites changed considerably over time. The fluctuations were significantly higher in lowland/submontane than montane reserves, possibly connected with differences in the disturbance regimes and especially damage caused by windstorms. In NW Europe, the blow down of formerly managed, even-aged stands led to extraordinary high volumes of dead wood shortly after reserve establishment. The implications for forest management and biodiversity conservation are discussed. An increase in dead wood volumes must be carried out in accordance with the local/regional forest type and disturbance regime. Thus, in order to fulfil the requirements of as many wood-depending organisms as possible, it is important to preserve not only larger amounts of dead wood, but also dead wood of different types and dimensions as well as securing a long-term continuity of dead wood.
@article{christensenDeadWoodEuropean2005,
  title = {Dead Wood in {{European}} Beech ({{Fagus}} Sylvatica) Forest Reserves},
  author = {Christensen, Morten and Hahn, Katrine and Mountford, Edward P. and Ódor, Péter and Standovár, Tibor and Rozenbergar, Dusan and Diaci, Jurij and Wijdeven, Sander and Meyer, Peter and Winter, Susanne and Vrska, Tomas},
  date = {2005-05},
  journaltitle = {Forest Ecology and Management},
  volume = {210},
  pages = {267--282},
  issn = {0378-1127},
  doi = {10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032},
  abstract = {Data were analysed on the volume of dead wood in 86 beech forest reserves, covering most of the range of European beech forests. The mean volume was 130~m3/ha and the variation among reserves was high, ranging from almost nil to 550~m3/ha. The volume depended significantly on forest type, age since reserve establishment and volume of living wood. More dead wood was found in montane (rather than lowland/submontane) reserves, longer-established reserves (time since designation) and reserves with higher volumes of living wood. On average, fallen dead wood contributed more to the total dead wood volume than standing dead wood. The percentage of dead wood that was standing was almost twice as high in montane than in lowland/submontane forest reserves (45\,\% versus 25\%). The volume of dead wood at selected sites changed considerably over time. The fluctuations were significantly higher in lowland/submontane than montane reserves, possibly connected with differences in the disturbance regimes and especially damage caused by windstorms. In NW Europe, the blow down of formerly managed, even-aged stands led to extraordinary high volumes of dead wood shortly after reserve establishment. The implications for forest management and biodiversity conservation are discussed. An increase in dead wood volumes must be carried out in accordance with the local/regional forest type and disturbance regime. Thus, in order to fulfil the requirements of as many wood-depending organisms as possible, it is important to preserve not only larger amounts of dead wood, but also dead wood of different types and dimensions as well as securing a long-term continuity of dead wood.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-11379619,biodiversity,dead-wood,europe,fagus-sylvatica,forest-resources},
  number = {1-3}
}

Downloads: 0