Introduction: Conspiracy Theories. Coady, D. Episteme, 4(2):131–134, June, 2007. Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Paper doi abstract bibtex There has been a lively philosophical debate about the nature of conspiracy theories and their epistemic status going on for some years now. This debate has shed light, not only on conspiracy theories themselves, but also, in the process, on a variety of issues in social epistemology, political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion.
@article{coady_introduction_2007,
title = {Introduction: {Conspiracy} {Theories}},
volume = {4},
issn = {1750-0117, 1742-3600},
shorttitle = {Introduction},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/introduction-conspiracy-theories/93E001BD88B04FF51C43C41150D4BC94},
doi = {10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.131},
abstract = {There has been a lively philosophical debate about the nature of conspiracy theories and their epistemic status going on for some years now. This debate has shed light, not only on conspiracy theories themselves, but also, in the process, on a variety of issues in social epistemology, political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2020-11-18},
journal = {Episteme},
author = {Coady, David},
month = jun,
year = {2007},
note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},
pages = {131--134},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"gSXSNNFLhrNFjrwts","bibbaseid":"coady-introductionconspiracytheories-2007","author_short":["Coady, D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Introduction: Conspiracy Theories","volume":"4","issn":"1750-0117, 1742-3600","shorttitle":"Introduction","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/introduction-conspiracy-theories/93E001BD88B04FF51C43C41150D4BC94","doi":"10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.131","abstract":"There has been a lively philosophical debate about the nature of conspiracy theories and their epistemic status going on for some years now. This debate has shed light, not only on conspiracy theories themselves, but also, in the process, on a variety of issues in social epistemology, political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2020-11-18","journal":"Episteme","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Coady"],"firstnames":["David"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2007","note":"Publisher: Cambridge University Press","pages":"131–134","bibtex":"@article{coady_introduction_2007,\n\ttitle = {Introduction: {Conspiracy} {Theories}},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tissn = {1750-0117, 1742-3600},\n\tshorttitle = {Introduction},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/introduction-conspiracy-theories/93E001BD88B04FF51C43C41150D4BC94},\n\tdoi = {10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.131},\n\tabstract = {There has been a lively philosophical debate about the nature of conspiracy theories and their epistemic status going on for some years now. This debate has shed light, not only on conspiracy theories themselves, but also, in the process, on a variety of issues in social epistemology, political philosophy, and the philosophy of religion.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2020-11-18},\n\tjournal = {Episteme},\n\tauthor = {Coady, David},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},\n\tpages = {131--134},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Coady, D."],"key":"coady_introduction_2007","id":"coady_introduction_2007","bibbaseid":"coady-introductionconspiracytheories-2007","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/introduction-conspiracy-theories/93E001BD88B04FF51C43C41150D4BC94"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["introduction","conspiracy","theories","coady"],"title":"Introduction: Conspiracy Theories","year":2007}